388 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12962102)
1. Research on humans: what have we learned?
King NM
Forum Appl Res Public Policy; 1997; 12(3):132-6. PubMed ID: 12962102
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. FDA revises informed consent regulations for emergency research.
Menasché A; Levine RJ
IRB; 1995; 17(5-6):19-22. PubMed ID: 11653359
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Children as research subjects: a proposal to revise the current federal regulations using a moral framework.
Ross LF
Stanford Law Pol Rev; 1997; 8(1):159-76. PubMed ID: 16528858
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Emergency trials 'by popular consent.
Kiernan V
New Sci; 1995 Nov; 148(2002):6. PubMed ID: 11656475
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Advertising for clinical research.
Miller FG; Schorr AF
IRB; 1999; 21(5):1-4. PubMed ID: 12625347
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Considering experimentation and elusive truth: informed consent made difficult.
Brodeur D
Issues (St Louis Mo); 1992; 7(2):1-8. PubMed ID: 11659444
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Proposal on waiver of informed consent poses major issues for research ethics.
Maloney DM
Hum Res Rep; 1997 Sep; 12(9):1-3. PubMed ID: 11660533
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Informed consent for research in schizophrenia.: an alternative for special studies.
Posever TA; Chelmow T
IRB; 2001; 23(1):10-5. PubMed ID: 12530451
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Research involving children: regulations, review boards and reform.
Gandhi R
J Health Care Law Policy; 2005; 8(2):264-330. PubMed ID: 16471026
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Regulation of research on the decisionally impaired: history and gaps in the current regulatory system.
Moreno JD
J Health Care Law Policy; 1998; 1(1):1-21. PubMed ID: 15573427
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. In harm's way: research subjects who are decisionally impaired.
Sundram CJ
J Health Care Law Policy; 1998; 1(1):36-65. PubMed ID: 15573429
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. The National Bioethics Advisory Commission: bridging the gaps in human subjects research protection.
Childress JF
J Health Care Law Policy; 1998; 1(1):105-22. PubMed ID: 15573433
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Bioethical malpractice: risk and responsibilities in human research.
Noah BA
J Health Care Law Policy; 2004; 7(2):175-241. PubMed ID: 15573441
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Ethical considerations in human experimentation.
Bernstein JE
J Clin Pharmacol New Drugs; 1975; 15(8-9):579-90. PubMed ID: 11661224
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. United States regulatory requirements for research involving human subjects.
J Biolaw Bus; 1998; 1(2):39-53. PubMed ID: 12739542
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Introduction to research ethics.
Wang JJ
Health Law News; 2000 Jun; 13(3):3, 14. PubMed ID: 12542033
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Achieving proper balance in research with decisionally-incapacitated subjects: NAMI's perspectives on the working group's proposal.
Flynn LM; Honberg RS
J Health Care Law Policy; 1998; 1(1):174-92. PubMed ID: 15573436
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Ethical and regulatory challenges associated with the exception from informed consent requirements for emergency research: from experimental design to institutional review board approval.
Vaslef SN; Cairns CB; Falletta JM
Arch Surg; 2006 Oct; 141(10):1019-23; discussion 1024. PubMed ID: 17043281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Innovative therapy. The responsibility of hospitals.
Cowan DH; Bertsch E
J Leg Med; 1984 Jun; 5(2):219-51. PubMed ID: 6611383
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. A taxonomy of value in clinical research.
Casarett DJ; Karlawish JH; Moreno JD
IRB; 2002; 24(6):1-6. PubMed ID: 12683394
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
