These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12962988)
1. Differential binocular input and local stereopsis. Hess RF; Liu CH; Wang YZ Vision Res; 2003 Oct; 43(22):2303-13. PubMed ID: 12962988 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Interocular differences in contrast and spatial frequency: effects on stereopsis and fusion. Schor C; Heckmann T Vision Res; 1989; 29(7):837-47. PubMed ID: 2623826 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A unified model for binocular fusion and depth perception. Ding J; Levi DM Vision Res; 2021 Mar; 180():11-36. PubMed ID: 33359897 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Luminance spatial scale and local stereo-sensitivity. Hess RF; Liu CH; Wang YZ Vision Res; 2002 Feb; 42(3):331-42. PubMed ID: 11809485 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Stereo channels with different temporal frequency tunings. Lee S; Shioiri S; Yaguchi H Vision Res; 2007 Feb; 47(3):289-97. PubMed ID: 17184805 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Interactions of spatial frequency and unequal monocular contrasts in stereopsis. Cormack LK; Stevenson SB; Landers DD Perception; 1997; 26(9):1121-36. PubMed ID: 9509147 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Impact of intraocular scatter on stereopsis. Zhao JL; Xiao F; Zhao HX; Dai Y; Zhang YD Vision Res; 2018 Dec; 153():124-128. PubMed ID: 30118720 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The binocular computation of visual direction. Mansfield JS; Legge GE Vision Res; 1996 Jan; 36(1):27-41. PubMed ID: 8746240 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effects of temporal frequency on binocular deficits in amblyopia. Kosovicheva A; Ferreira A; Vera-Diaz FA; Bex PJ Vision Res; 2019 Oct; 163():52-62. PubMed ID: 31404553 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Spatial-frequency and contrast tuning of the transient-stereopsis system. Schor CM; Edwards M; Pope DR Vision Res; 1998 Oct; 38(20):3057-68. PubMed ID: 9893815 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Coexistence of binocular integration and suppression determined by surface border information. Su Y; He ZJ; Ooi TL Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2009 Sep; 106(37):15990-5. PubMed ID: 19805239 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Adaptive optics binocular visual simulator to study stereopsis in the presence of aberrations. Fernández EJ; Prieto PM; Artal P J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis; 2010 Nov; 27(11):A48-55. PubMed ID: 21045890 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Interocular correlation sensitivity and its relationship with stereopsis. Reynaud A; Hess RF J Vis; 2018 Jan; 18(1):11. PubMed ID: 29362804 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Interocular differences in higher-order aberrations on binocular visual performance. Jiménez JR; Castro JJ; Jiménez R; Hita E Optom Vis Sci; 2008 Mar; 85(3):174-9. PubMed ID: 18317332 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Envelope size tuning for stereo-depth perception of small and large disparities. Schor CM; Edwards M; Sato M Vision Res; 2001 Sep; 41(20):2555-67. PubMed ID: 11520503 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effects of cue context on the perception of depth from combined disparity and perspective cues. Harwerth RS; Moeller MC; Wensveen JM Optom Vis Sci; 1998 Jun; 75(6):433-44. PubMed ID: 9661212 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]