These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1296310)
1. [Interpretation of an epidemiolog survey. Survey types, concepts of bias, causality]. Landais P; Jais JP Rev Prat; 1992 Nov; 42(18):2377-82. PubMed ID: 1296310 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. [Interpretation of an epidemiological survey. Survey types, concepts of bias, causality]. Bastuji-Garin S Rev Prat; 1996 Apr; 46(8):997-1003. PubMed ID: 8762237 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. How statistics can be used to promote better health care. Sinclair J Nurs Times; 1999 Jun 23-29; 95(25):44-6. PubMed ID: 10497591 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Causality in epidemiological research. Zieliński A Przegl Epidemiol; 2009; 63(4):557-64. PubMed ID: 20120956 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Assessing response reliability of health interview surveys using reinterviews. Fabricant SJ; Harpham T Bull World Health Organ; 1993; 71(3-4):341-8. PubMed ID: 8324853 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Adjustments for non-telephone bias in random-digit-dialling surveys. Frankel MR; Srinath KP; Hoaglin DC; Battaglia MP; Smith PJ; Wright RA; Khare M Stat Med; 2003 May; 22(9):1611-26. PubMed ID: 12704619 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Causality in epidemiology: populations, individuals, and alternative explanations]. Botti C; Comba P; Pirastu R; Vineis P Epidemiol Prev; 1999; 23(4):260-7. PubMed ID: 10730466 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Interpretation of epidemiologic studies. Type of study, elements of bias, causality]. Touzet S; Colin C Rev Prat; 1999 Oct; 49(16):1797-804. PubMed ID: 10578612 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Minimizing error in the field: quality control in dietary surveys. Haraldsdóttir J Eur J Clin Nutr; 1993 Oct; 47 Suppl 2():S19-24. PubMed ID: 8262013 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Interpretation of low to moderate relative risks in environmental epidemiologic studies. Acquavella JF; Friedlander BR; Ireland BK Annu Rev Public Health; 1994; 15():179-201. PubMed ID: 8054080 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Causal inference and the relevance of social epidemiology. Oakes JM Soc Sci Med; 2004 May; 58(10):1969-71. PubMed ID: 15020012 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Nonresponse error in injury-risk surveys. Johnson TP; Holbrook AL; Ik Cho Y; Bossarte RM Am J Prev Med; 2006 Nov; 31(5):427-36. PubMed ID: 17046415 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Chapter IV. The effects of respondent rules on health survey reports. Mathiowetz NA; Groves RM Vital Health Stat 2; 1987 Aug; (106):26-32. PubMed ID: 15791753 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Possible aggregation biases in road safety research and a mechanism approach to accident modeling. Davis GA Accid Anal Prev; 2004 Nov; 36(6):1119-27. PubMed ID: 15350890 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Commentary: Why are we biased against bias? Kaufman JS Int J Epidemiol; 2008 Jun; 37(3):624-6. PubMed ID: 18316349 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. The relevance of multilevel statistical methods for identifying causal neighborhood effects. Subramanian SV Soc Sci Med; 2004 May; 58(10):1961-7. PubMed ID: 15020011 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. But is it significant? Cook RR Ann Plast Surg; 1993 Jul; 31(1):94-5. PubMed ID: 8357228 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]