376 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12963662)
1. Minilaparoscopic and laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a comparative study.
Huang MT; Wang W; Wei PL; Chen RJ; Lee WJ
Arch Surg; 2003 Sep; 138(9):1017-23. PubMed ID: 12963662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Randomized clinical trial of laparoscopic cholecystectomy performed with mini-instruments.
Sarli L; Iusco D; Gobbi S; Porrini C; Ferro M; Roncoroni L
Br J Surg; 2003 Nov; 90(11):1345-8. PubMed ID: 14598412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Advantages of mini-laparoscopic vs conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy: results of a prospective randomized trial.
Novitsky YW; Kercher KW; Czerniach DR; Kaban GK; Khera S; Gallagher-Dorval KA; Callery MP; Litwin DE; Kelly JJ
Arch Surg; 2005 Dec; 140(12):1178-83. PubMed ID: 16365239
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Mini-laparoscopic cholecystectomy vs laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
Sarli L; Costi R; Sansebastiano G
Surg Endosc; 2001 Jun; 15(6):614-8. PubMed ID: 11591952
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Randomized clinical trial of single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus minilaparoscopic cholecystectomy.
Lee PC; Lo C; Lai PS; Chang JJ; Huang SJ; Lin MT; Lee PH
Br J Surg; 2010 Jul; 97(7):1007-12. PubMed ID: 20632264
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Minilaparoscopic versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a randomised controlled trial.
Gupta A; Shrivastava UK; Kumar P; Burman D
Trop Gastroenterol; 2005; 26(3):149-51. PubMed ID: 16512468
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Prospective randomized comparative study of single incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus conventional four-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
Lai EC; Yang GP; Tang CN; Yih PC; Chan OC; Li MK
Am J Surg; 2011 Sep; 202(3):254-8. PubMed ID: 21871979
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Outpatient versus inpatient laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a single center clinical analysis.
Ji W; Ding K; Li LT; Wang D; Li N; Li JS
Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int; 2010 Feb; 9(1):60-4. PubMed ID: 20133231
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Laparoendoscopic single site (LESS) versus classic video-laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a randomized prospective study.
Aprea G; Coppola Bottazzi E; Guida F; Masone S; Persico G
J Surg Res; 2011 Apr; 166(2):e109-12. PubMed ID: 21227454
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Early laparoscopic cholecystectomy is the preferred management of acute cholecystitis.
Casillas RA; Yegiyants S; Collins JC
Arch Surg; 2008 Jun; 143(6):533-7. PubMed ID: 18559744
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Ambulatory laparoscopic cholecystectomy is as effective as hospitalization and from a social perspective less expensive: a randomized study].
Dirksen CD; Schmitz RF; Hans KM; Nieman FH; Hoogenboom LJ; Go PM
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2001 Dec; 145(50):2434-9. PubMed ID: 11776671
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Randomized clinical trial of small-incision and laparoscopic cholecystectomy in patients with symptomatic cholecystolithiasis: primary and clinical outcomes.
Keus F; Werner JE; Gooszen HG; Oostvogel HJ; van Laarhoven CJ
Arch Surg; 2008 Apr; 143(4):371-7; discussion 377-8. PubMed ID: 18427025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Single-step treatment of gall bladder and bile duct stones: a combined endoscopic-laparoscopic technique.
Ghazal AH; Sorour MA; El-Riwini M; El-Bahrawy H
Int J Surg; 2009 Aug; 7(4):338-46. PubMed ID: 19481184
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A randomized, prospective, blinded comparison of postoperative pain, metabolic response, and perceived health after laparoscopic and small incision cholecystectomy.
Squirrell DM; Majeed AW; Troy G; Peacock JE; Nicholl JP; Johnson AG
Surgery; 1998 May; 123(5):485-95. PubMed ID: 9591000
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis].
Kondras M; Wojtczak M; Janiak A; Mandryka Y; Szewczyk T; Modzelewski B
Pol Merkur Lekarski; 2007 Aug; 23(134):92-4. PubMed ID: 18044335
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Laparoscopic vs. open cholecystectomy in patients aged 65 and older.
Lujan JA; Sanchez-Bueno F; Parrilla P; Robles R; Torralba JA; Gonzalez-Costea R
Surg Laparosc Endosc; 1998 Jun; 8(3):208-10. PubMed ID: 9649045
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Microlaparoscopic vs conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a prospective randomized double-blind trial.
Bisgaard T; Klarskov B; Trap R; Kehlet H; Rosenberg J
Surg Endosc; 2002 Mar; 16(3):458-64. PubMed ID: 11928028
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. An evaluation of laparoscopic versus open cholecystectomy.
Hardy KJ; Miller H; Fletcher DR; Jones RM; Shulkes A; McNeil JJ
Med J Aust; 1994 Jan; 160(2):58-62. PubMed ID: 8309369
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Laparoscopic versus open cholecystectomy: a matched study.
Sanabria JR; Clavien PA; Cywes R; Strasberg SM
Can J Surg; 1993 Aug; 36(4):330-6. PubMed ID: 8103704
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Laparoscopic or open cholecystectomy: a prospective randomised trial to compare postoperative pain, pulmonary function, and stress response.
Hendolin HI; Pääkönen ME; Alhava EM; Tarvainen R; Kemppinen T; Lahtinen P
Eur J Surg; 2000 May; 166(5):394-9. PubMed ID: 10881952
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
