636 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12964283)
1. Understanding research: 3. Critiquing findings and conclusions.
Baxter H
J Wound Care; 2001 Oct; 10(9):376-9. PubMed ID: 12964283
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Reliability and validity in research.
Roberts P; Priest H
Nurs Stand; 2006 Jul 12-18; 20(44):41-5. PubMed ID: 16872117
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Case study: design? Method? Or comprehensive strategy?
Jones C; Lyons C
Nurse Res; 2004; 11(3):70-6. PubMed ID: 15065485
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Missing data: an introductory conceptual overview for the novice researcher.
El-Masri MM; Fox-Wasylyshyn SM
Can J Nurs Res; 2005 Dec; 37(4):156-71. PubMed ID: 16541824
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Critiquing research for use in practice.
Dale JC
J Pediatr Health Care; 2005; 19(3):183-6. PubMed ID: 15867836
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Understanding and critiquing qualitative research papers.
Lee P
Nurs Times; 2006 Jul 18-24; 102(29):30-2. PubMed ID: 16895246
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Triangulation.
Ramprogus V
Nurse Res; 2005; 12(4):4-6. PubMed ID: 16045042
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Secondary analysis of data.
Coyer SM; Gallo AM
J Pediatr Health Care; 2005; 19(1):60-3. PubMed ID: 15662366
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Understanding research: 2. Ensuring reliability and validity.
Baxter H
J Wound Care; 2001 Sep; 10(8):329-31. PubMed ID: 12964336
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Triangulation as a method for contemporary nursing research.
Halcomb E; Andrew S
Nurse Res; 2005; 13(2):71-82. PubMed ID: 16416981
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Quantitative vs qualitative research.
Brink H
Nurs RSA; 1991 Jan; 6(1):14-8. PubMed ID: 2011171
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Reliability and validity in practice: assessment tools.
Alison T; Shields L
Paediatr Nurs; 2005 Nov; 17(9):43. PubMed ID: 16315818
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluating qualitative research studies.
Pickler RH
J Pediatr Health Care; 2007; 21(3):195-7. PubMed ID: 17478311
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. [Pertinence of qualitative research: comparative approach in qualitative and quantitative research].
Corbalan JA
Rech Soins Infirm; 2000 Jun; (61):13-22. PubMed ID: 12037858
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Understanding research: 1. Methodologies used to answer research questions.
Baxter H
J Wound Care; 2001 Jul; 10(7):269-72. PubMed ID: 12964346
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Validity and reliability: what do these terms mean?
Maughan ED
NASN Sch Nurse; 2009 May; 24(3):119-20. PubMed ID: 20437676
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Thinking both inside and outside the box on measurement articles.
Froman RD; Schmitt MH
Res Nurs Health; 2003 Oct; 26(5):335-6. PubMed ID: 14579254
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Part II. rigour in qualitative research: complexities and solutions.
Tuckett AG
Nurse Res; 2005; 13(1):29-42. PubMed ID: 16220839
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Research guidelines for the Delphi survey technique.
Hasson F; Keeney S; McKenna H
J Adv Nurs; 2000 Oct; 32(4):1008-15. PubMed ID: 11095242
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Understanding the error of our ways: mapping the concepts of validity and reliability.
Higgins PA; Straub AJ
Nurs Outlook; 2006; 54(1):23-9. PubMed ID: 16487776
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
