230 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12964347)
1. Removal of perforated adhesive tape: dry versus solvent-assisted.
Sylaidis P; Clibbon J; Eagling V; King C
J Wound Care; 2001 Jul; 10(7):273-5. PubMed ID: 12964347
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Fact or myth? Pain reduction in solvent-assisted removal of adhesive tape.
Schaik Rv; Rövekamp MH
J Wound Care; 2011 Aug; 20(8):380-3. PubMed ID: 21841714
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Lipid uptake and skin occlusion following topical application of oils on adult and infant skin.
Stamatas GN; de Sterke J; Hauser M; von Stetten O; van der Pol A
J Dermatol Sci; 2008 May; 50(2):135-42. PubMed ID: 18164596
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effect of solvent type on microtensile bond strength of a total-etch one-bottle adhesive system to moist or dry dentin.
Cardoso Pde C; Lopes GC; Vieira LC; Baratieri LN
Oper Dent; 2005; 30(3):376-81. PubMed ID: 15986959
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effect of adhesive retention on maxillofacial prostheses. Part I: skin dressings and solvent removers.
Kiat-amnuay S; Gettleman L; Khan Z; Goldsmith LJ
J Prosthet Dent; 2000 Sep; 84(3):335-40. PubMed ID: 11005907
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effect of a water-based no-sting, protective barrier formulation and a solvent-containing similar formulation on skin protection from medical adhesive trauma.
Shannon RJ; Chakravarthy D
Int Wound J; 2009 Feb; 6(1):82-8. PubMed ID: 19291121
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A randomized and controlled comparison of gentleness of 2 medical adhesive tapes in healthy human subjects.
Grove GL; Zerweck CR; Houser TP; Smith GE; Koski NI
J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs; 2013; 40(1):51-9. PubMed ID: 23202590
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of Medical Tape Performance Using Skin Response Quantitative Measurements on Healthy Volunteers.
Turnbull MJ; Grigsby I; Unertl K; Sokol K; Nordby T; Liu C; Bailey A; Spiewak B; Smith G; McNulty AK
Cureus; 2024 Mar; 16(3):e56548. PubMed ID: 38646282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A temperature-sensitive, high-adhesion medical tape: a comparative, single-blind clinical trial.
Swanson S; Luu V; Smith R; Gross A; Tudor J; MacKenzie D; Taroc AM; Gow KW; Nelson LY; Seibel EJ
J Wound Care; 2023 Oct; 32(10):665-675. PubMed ID: 37830828
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Stratum corneum adhesive tape stripping: influence of anatomical site, application pressure, duration and removal.
Löffler H; Dreher F; Maibach HI
Br J Dermatol; 2004 Oct; 151(4):746-52. PubMed ID: 15491413
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparative efficacy of soap water, spirit, acetone and ether in removing the adherent material formed during and after removal of micropore tape.
Sekar SC; Srinivas CR
Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol; 2008; 74(4):391-2. PubMed ID: 18797070
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Effect of topical solvents on ultraviolet B erythema.
Langtry JJ; Schauberger G; Diffey BL
Photodermatol Photoimmunol Photomed; 1990 Aug; 7(4):143-5. PubMed ID: 2076369
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Use of nitrogen cryogun for separating duct tape and recovery of latent fingerprints with a powder suspension method.
Bailey JA; Crane JS
Forensic Sci Int; 2011 Jul; 210(1-3):170-3. PubMed ID: 21501936
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Dressing spray enhances the adhesive strength of surgical dressing tapes.
Sarifakioglu E; Sarifakioglu N
Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol; 2006; 72(5):353-6. PubMed ID: 17050929
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A confocal microscopic evaluation of resin-dentin interface using adhesive systems with three different solvents bonded to dry and moist dentinan in vitro study.
Mohan B; Kandaswamy D
Quintessence Int; 2005; 36(7-8):511-21. PubMed ID: 15997932
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Quick-release medical tape.
Laulicht B; Langer R; Karp JM
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2012 Nov; 109(46):18803-8. PubMed ID: 23112196
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Prototype Development of a Temperature-Sensitive High-Adhesion Medical Tape to Reduce Medical-Adhesive-Related Skin Injury and Improve Quality of Care.
Swanson S; Bashmail R; Fellin CR; Luu V; Shires N; Cox PA; Nelson A; MacKenzie D; Taroc AM; Nelson LY; Seibel EJ
Int J Mol Sci; 2022 Jun; 23(13):. PubMed ID: 35806167
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Conformability and irritancy of adhesive tapes on the skin.
Tokumura F; Ohyama K; Fujisawa H; Matsuda T; Kitazaki Y
Contact Dermatitis; 1997 Oct; 37(4):173-8. PubMed ID: 9385512
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Study of the adhesiveness of medical tapes when wet, dry or following application of Friars' balsam.
Beringer RM
Paediatr Anaesth; 2008 Jun; 18(6):520-4. PubMed ID: 18331555
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Acute barrier disruption by adhesive tapes is influenced by pressure, time and anatomical location: integrity and cohesion assessed by sequential tape stripping. A randomized, controlled study.
Breternitz M; Flach M; Prässler J; Elsner P; Fluhr JW
Br J Dermatol; 2007 Feb; 156(2):231-40. PubMed ID: 17223861
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
