These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12964659)

  • 1. Image quality in digital radiographic systems.
    de Almeida SM; de Oliveira AE; Ferreira RI; Bóscolo FN
    Braz Dent J; 2003; 14(2):136-41. PubMed ID: 12964659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A comparative study of image quality and radiation exposure for dental radiographs produced using a charge-coupled device and a phosphor plate system.
    Farrier SL; Drage NA; Newcombe RG; Hayes SJ; Dummer PM
    Int Endod J; 2009 Oct; 42(10):900-7. PubMed ID: 19548931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effect of bit depth and kVp of digital radiography for detection of subtle differences.
    Heo MS; Choi DH; Benavides E; Huh KH; Yi WJ; Lee SS; Choi SC
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2009 Aug; 108(2):278-83. PubMed ID: 19272812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Subjective image quality of solid-state and photostimulable phosphor systems for digital intra-oral radiography.
    Borg E; Attaelmanan A; Gröndahl HG
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2000 Mar; 29(2):70-5. PubMed ID: 10808218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of complementary metal oxide semiconductor and charge-coupled device intraoral X-ray detectors using subjective image quality.
    Kitagawa H; Scheetz JP; Farman AG
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2003 Nov; 32(6):408-11. PubMed ID: 15070845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effect of beam energy and filtration on the signal-to-noise ratio of the Dexis intraoral X-ray detector.
    Kitagawa H; Farman AG
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2004 Jan; 33(1):21-4. PubMed ID: 15140818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Clinical study of the sensitivity and dynamic range of three digital systems, E-speed film and digitized film.
    Bóscolo FN; Oliveira AE; Almeida SM; Haiter CF; Haiter Neto F
    Braz Dent J; 2001; 12(3):191-5. PubMed ID: 11696917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Some characteristics of solid-state and photo-stimulable phosphor detectors for intra-oral radiography.
    Borg E
    Swed Dent J Suppl; 1999; 139():i-viii, 1-67. PubMed ID: 10635104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A laboratory comparison of three imaging systems for image quality and radiation exposure characteristics.
    Bhaskaran V; Qualtrough AJ; Rushton VE; Worthington HV; Horner K
    Int Endod J; 2005 Sep; 38(9):645-52. PubMed ID: 16104978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparative study of two digital radiographic storage phosphor systems.
    Oliveira AE; de Almeida SM; Paganini GA; Haiter Neto F; Bóscolo FN
    Braz Dent J; 2000; 11(2):111-6. PubMed ID: 11210259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Assessing the image quality of a CCD-based digital intraoral radiography system: application of perceptibility curve test.
    Hayakawa Y; Kitagawa H; Wakoh M; Kuroyanagi K; Welander U
    Bull Tokyo Dent Coll; 2000 Feb; 41(1):9-14. PubMed ID: 11212381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. On the dynamic range of different X-ray photon detectors in intra-oral radiography. A comparison of image quality in film, charge-coupled device and storage phosphor systems.
    Borg E; Gröndahl HG
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1996 Apr; 25(2):82-8. PubMed ID: 9446978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A comprehensive in vitro study of image accuracy and quality for periodontal diagnosis. Part 1: the influence of X-ray generator on periodontal measurements using conventional and digital receptors.
    Vandenberghe B; Corpas L; Bosmans H; Yang J; Jacobs R
    Clin Oral Investig; 2011 Aug; 15(4):537-49. PubMed ID: 20443035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Image quality of two solid-state and three photostimulable phosphor plate digital panoramic systems, and treatment planning of mandibular third molar removal.
    Benediktsdottir IS; Hintze H; Petersen JK; Wenzel A
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2003 Jan; 32(1):39-44. PubMed ID: 12820852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Intraoral radiology in general dental practices - a comparison of digital and film-based X-ray systems with regard to radiation protection and dose reduction.
    Anissi HD; Geibel MA
    Rofo; 2014 Aug; 186(8):762-7. PubMed ID: 24648236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The dynamic range of digital radiographic systems: dose reduction or risk of overexposure?
    Berkhout WE; Beuger DA; Sanderink GC; van der Stelt PF
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2004 Jan; 33(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 15140814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Digital imaging for dental caries.
    Wenzel A
    Dent Clin North Am; 2000 Apr; 44(2):319-38, vi. PubMed ID: 10740771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Forensic oral imaging quality of hand-held dental X-ray devices: comparison of two image receptors and two devices.
    Pittayapat P; Thevissen P; Fieuws S; Jacobs R; Willems G
    Forensic Sci Int; 2010 Jan; 194(1-3):20-7. PubMed ID: 19913377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Performance evaluation and testing of digital intra-oral radiographic systems.
    Doyle P; Finney L
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 117(1-3):313-7. PubMed ID: 16461488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Charge-coupled device panoramic radiography: effect of beam energy on radiation exposure.
    Farman TT; Farman AG; Kelly MS; Firriolo FJ; Yancey JM; Stewart AV
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1998 Jan; 27(1):36-40. PubMed ID: 9482021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.