466 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12964681)
1. Comparison of the replicability of routinely used centric relation registration techniques.
Keshvad A; Winstanley RB
J Prosthodont; 2003 Jun; 12(2):90-101. PubMed ID: 12964681
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A technique for evaluation of centric relation tooth contacts. Part I: During normal temporomandibular joint function.
Capp NJ; Clayton JA
J Prosthet Dent; 1985 Oct; 54(4):569-74. PubMed ID: 3862815
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Three-dimensional analysis of models articulated in the seated condylar position from a deprogrammed asymptomatic population: a prospective study. Part 1.
Cordray FE
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 May; 129(5):619-30. PubMed ID: 16679202
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Reproducibility of the centric relation bite registration technique.
Wood DP; Elliott RW
Angle Orthod; 1994; 64(3):211-20. PubMed ID: 8060017
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Guided and unguided mandibular reference positions in asymptomatic individuals.
Celar A; Freudenthaler J; Crismani A; Graf A
Orthod Craniofac Res; 2013 Feb; 16(1):28-35. PubMed ID: 23311657
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Estimated and true hinge axis: a comparison of condylar displacements.
Wood DP; Korne PH
Angle Orthod; 1992; 62(3):167-75; discussion 176. PubMed ID: 1416235
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A comparative study to evaluate the discrepancy in condylar guidance values between two commercially available arcon and non-arcon articulators: a clinical study.
Goyal MK; Goyal S
Indian J Dent Res; 2011; 22(6):880. PubMed ID: 22484898
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparing maximum intercuspal contacts of virtual dental patients and mounted dental casts.
Delong R; Ko CC; Anderson GC; Hodges JS; Douglas WH
J Prosthet Dent; 2002 Dec; 88(6):622-30. PubMed ID: 12488856
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Determining the accuracy of articulator interchangeability and hinge axis reproducibility.
Hatzi P; Millstein P; Maya A
J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Mar; 85(3):236-45. PubMed ID: 11264930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparing condylar positions achieved through bimanual manipulation to condylar positions achieved through masticatory muscle contraction against an anterior deprogrammer: a pilot study.
McKee JR
J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Oct; 94(4):389-93. PubMed ID: 16198178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The use of a deprogramming appliance to obtain centric relation records.
Karl PJ; Foley TF
Angle Orthod; 1999 Apr; 69(2):117-24; discussion 124-5. PubMed ID: 10227551
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Movement between centric relation contact position and the intercuspal position.
Wise MD
Int J Prosthodont; 1992; 5(4):333-44. PubMed ID: 1520455
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparative study of intermaxillary relationships of manual and swallowing methods.
Alvarez MC; Turbino ML; Barros Cd; Pagnano VO; Bezzon OL
Braz Dent J; 2009; 20(1):78-83. PubMed ID: 19466237
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of condylar guidance setting obtained from a wax record versus an extraoral tracing: a pilot study.
dos Santos J; Nelson S; Nowlin T
J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Jan; 89(1):54-9. PubMed ID: 12589287
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Is there a benefit of using an arbitrary facebow for the fabrication of a stabilization appliance?
Shodadai SP; Türp JC; Gerds T; Strub JR
Int J Prosthodont; 2001; 14(6):517-22. PubMed ID: 12066697
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Is There "A Best" Centric Relation Record? Centric Relation Records, Condyle Positions, and Their Practical Significance.
Utz KH; Lückerath W; Schwarting P; Noethlichs W; Büttner R; Grüner M; Fuß E; Stark H
Int J Prosthodont; 2023; 36(3):262–272. PubMed ID: 36484682
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The reproducibility of condylar hinge axis positions in patients, by different operators, using the electronic mandibular position indicator.
Tuppy F; Celar RM; Celar AG; Piehslinger E; Jäger W
J Orofac Pain; 1994; 8(3):315-20. PubMed ID: 7812230
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Comparative analysis of edentulous patients treated traditionally and with the use of a face-bow and Quick Master articulator].
Kubrak J
Ann Acad Med Stetin; 1998; 44():237-49. PubMed ID: 9857542
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Analysis of mandibular position of patients with angles Class I and Class II, division 1 malocclusion].
He H; Fu M
Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2001 Sep; 36(5):367-70. PubMed ID: 11769653
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Mandibular condyle position: comparison of articulator mountings and magnetic resonance imaging.
Alexander SR; Moore RN; DuBois LM
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1993 Sep; 104(3):230-9. PubMed ID: 8362784
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
