These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12964800)

  • 1. Subperiosteal implant technology: report from Rumania.
    Sirbu I
    J Oral Implantol; 2003; 29(4):189-94. PubMed ID: 12964800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Ramus hinges for excessive movements of the condyles: a new dimension in mandibular tripodal subperiosteal implants.
    Linkow LI; Ghalili R
    J Oral Implantol; 1999; 25(1):11-7. PubMed ID: 10483422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Analysis of HA-coated subperiosteal implants.
    Minichetti JC
    J Oral Implantol; 2003; 29(3):111-6; discussion 117-9. PubMed ID: 12837050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Fixed prosthesis with a milled bar for correcting misangled implants: a clinical report.
    Lee JH; Frias V; Woo C; Maiberg R
    J Prosthet Dent; 2007 Mar; 97(3):129-32. PubMed ID: 17394909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A seven-year clinical evaluation of soft-tissue effects of hydroxylapatite-coated vs. uncoated subperiosteal implants.
    Fettig RH; Kay JF
    J Oral Implantol; 1994; 20(1):42-8. PubMed ID: 7932855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Critical design errors in maxillary subperiosteal implants.
    Linkow LI; Ghalili R
    J Oral Implantol; 1998; 24(4):198-205. PubMed ID: 10321207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Immediate loading of dental implants placed in revascularized fibula free flaps: a clinical report on 2 consecutive patients.
    Chiapasco M; Gatti C
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2004; 19(6):906-12. PubMed ID: 15623070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The use of laser technology (Er;Cr:YSGG) and stereolithography to aid in the placement of a subperiosteal implant: case study.
    Kusek ER
    J Oral Implantol; 2009; 35(1):5-11. PubMed ID: 19288882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Subperiosteal implants provide another option for dentistry: one practitioner's experience.
    O'Roark WL
    MSDA J; 1996; 39(1):37-40. PubMed ID: 9569874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Reconstruction of advanced mandibular resorption with both subperiosteal and root-form implants.
    Perry RT
    Implant Dent; 1998; 7(2):94-102. PubMed ID: 9743638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A pilot study of complete edentulous rehabilitation with immediate function using a new implant design: case series.
    Maló P; Nobre Mde A; Petersson U; Wigren S
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2006; 8(4):223-32. PubMed ID: 17100748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Subperiosteal implants.
    Stvrtecky RO; Borgetti ZA; Manzano M
    J Oral Implantol; 1993; 19(1):48-53. PubMed ID: 8246294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A 5-year prospective multicenter study on 1-stage smooth-surface Brånemark System implants with early loading in edentulous mandibles.
    Friberg B; Raghoebar GM; Grunert I; Hobkirk JA; Tepper G
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008; 23(3):481-6. PubMed ID: 18700372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Immediate occlusal loading for fixed prostheses in implant dentistry.
    Misch CE; Wang HL
    Dent Today; 2003 Aug; 22(8):50-6. PubMed ID: 14515575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A 41-year history of a mandibular subperiosteal implant.
    Schou S; Pallesen L; Hjørting-Hansen E; Pedersen CS; Fibaek B
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2000 Apr; 11(2):171-8. PubMed ID: 11168208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Tilting of posterior mandibular and maxillary implants for improved prosthesis support.
    Krekmanov L; Kahn M; Rangert B; Lindström H
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2000; 15(3):405-14. PubMed ID: 10874806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The subperiosteal implant as a viable long-term treatment modality in the severely atrophied mandible: a patient's 40-year case history.
    Kurtzman GM; Schwartz K
    J Oral Implantol; 1995; 21(1):35-9. PubMed ID: 7473869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Rehabilitation of edentulous mandibles by means of five TiUnite implants after one-stage surgery: a 1-year retrospective study of 90 patients.
    Friberg B; Jemt T
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2008 Mar; 10(1):47-54. PubMed ID: 18254740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Immediate function of cortically anchored disk-design implants without bone augmentation in moderately to severely resorbed completely edentulous maxillae.
    Scortecci G
    J Oral Implantol; 1999; 25(2):70-9. PubMed ID: 10551141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The longitudinal clinical effectiveness of osseointegrated dental implants in posterior partially edentulous patients.
    Zarb GA; Schmitt A
    Int J Prosthodont; 1993; 6(2):189-96. PubMed ID: 8329097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.