These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

164 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1296496)

  • 1. Ioversol in intravenous excretory urography. Evaluation of radiographic quality, patient tolerance and safety in four clinical studies.
    Jahn H; Müller-Späth R
    Ann Radiol (Paris); 1992; 35(4 Pt 2):297-302. PubMed ID: 1296496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Evaluation of efficacy and tolerability of ioversol in intravenous urography. A comparative double-blind study versus iopamidol].
    Joffre F; Rousseau H; Aziza R
    Ann Radiol (Paris); 1992; 35(4 Pt 2):288-92. PubMed ID: 1296494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Evaluation of clinical tolerability and diagnostic efficacy of ioversol 350 in UIV. A randomized double-blind study of ioversol 350 versus iohexol 350].
    Voegeli E; Woessmer B
    Ann Radiol (Paris); 1992; 35(4 Pt 2):293-6. PubMed ID: 1296495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Efficacy and safety of iopromide for excretory urography.
    Newhouse JH; Landman J; Lang E; Amis ES; Goldman S; Khazan R; Leder R; Hedgcock M
    Invest Radiol; 1994 May; 29 Suppl 1():S68-73. PubMed ID: 8071049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A double-blind comparative study on the contrast quality, tolerance and safety of ioversol 300 versus iohexol 300 in central venous angiography (C.V. DSA).
    Rieser R; Beinborn W; Ney N
    Ann Radiol (Paris); 1992; 35(4 Pt 2):311-4. PubMed ID: 1296499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A double-blind clinical study comparing the safety, tolerance and efficacy of ioversol and iohexol in intravenous urography.
    Colthurst JR; Chan O; Creagh M; Gordon P; Guy R; Muncey F; Ayers AB
    Clin Radiol; 1990 Sep; 42(3):174-6. PubMed ID: 2208927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Evaluation of efficacy and tolerability of ioversol in intravenous urography].
    Lemaître L
    Ann Radiol (Paris); 1992; 35(4 Pt 2):303-6. PubMed ID: 1296497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Unequal doses of ioversol versus diatrizoate for urography.
    Baker MK; Kopecky KK; Bogan M; Wass JL
    Urol Radiol; 1990; 12(3):168-72. PubMed ID: 2281582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Ioversol for intravenous urography: a comparison study.
    Kaufman AJ; Concepcion R; Kirchner FK; McDougal WS; Winfield AC
    Urol Radiol; 1990; 12(1):56-60. PubMed ID: 2333674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A randomized, double-blind, parallel group trial of iomeprol, iohexol and iopamidol in intravenous urography.
    Harding JR; Bertazzoli M; Spinazzi A
    Br J Radiol; 1995 Jul; 68(811):712-5. PubMed ID: 7640924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A randomised, double-blind trial of iomeprol and iopromide in intravenous excretory urography.
    Harding JR; Bertazzoli M; Spinazzi A
    Eur J Radiol; 1994 May; 18 Suppl 1():S93-6. PubMed ID: 8020526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Clinical profile of ioversol. A metaanalysis of 57 randomized, double-blind clinical trials.
    Floriani I; Ciceri M; Torri V; Tinazzi A; Jahn H; Noseda A
    Invest Radiol; 1996 Aug; 31(8):479-91. PubMed ID: 8854194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of the nephrotoxicity between ioversol and iohexol.
    Hayami S; Ishigooka M; Suzuki Y; Hashimoto T; Nakada T; Mitobe K
    Int Urol Nephrol; 1996; 28(5):615-9. PubMed ID: 9061418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Acute and subacute toxicity studies of ioversol in experimental animals.
    Ralston WH; Robbins MS; Coveney J; Blair M
    Invest Radiol; 1989 Jun; 24 Suppl 1():S2-9. PubMed ID: 2592169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Ioversol 300: clinical study in pediatric intravenous urography].
    Montagne J; Adamsbaum C
    Ann Radiol (Paris); 1992; 35(4 Pt 2):307-10. PubMed ID: 1296498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Quality control in urography with iopamidol and iohexol. A parallel comparison].
    Stacul F; Bazzocchi M; Zanella F; Abbona M; Ukovich W
    Radiol Med; 1987 Mar; 73(3):196-8. PubMed ID: 3562919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effect of viscosity and iodine concentration of nonionic radiographic contrast media on coronary arteriography in patients.
    Kern MJ; Roth RA; Aguirre FV; Beauman G; Vogel R
    Am Heart J; 1992 Jan; 123(1):160-5. PubMed ID: 1729820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of iodixanol with iohexol in excretory urography.
    Siegle RL; Gavant ML
    Acad Radiol; 1996 Sep; 3 Suppl 3():S524-7. PubMed ID: 8883532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A double-blind study comparing the efficiency, tolerance and renal effects of iopromide and iopamidol.
    Kennedy C; Rickards D; Lee S; Sharp MB; Dawson P
    Br J Radiol; 1988 Apr; 61(724):288-93. PubMed ID: 3285943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Double-blind randomized study comparing ioversol 300 versus iopromide 300 abdominal computed tomography (CT scanner)].
    Hoogewoud HM; Neiss AC; Woessmer B
    Ann Radiol (Paris); 1992; 35(4 Pt 2):273-5. PubMed ID: 1296490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.