These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
172 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12965247)
1. A reviewer's lot is not a happy one. Raine CS J Neuroimmunol; 2003 Aug; 141(1-2):1-2. PubMed ID: 12965247 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Landmark, landmine, or landfill? The role of peer review in assessing manuscripts. Balistreri WF J Pediatr; 2007 Aug; 151(2):107-8. PubMed ID: 17643754 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. New Year's Resolutions-New Year Reviewers-New Year of Review. Woodruff TK Endocrinology; 2019 Jan; 160(1):36-37. PubMed ID: 30551172 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Welcome Message from the New Editor-in-Chief. Zemel MB J Med Food; 2019 Mar; 22(3):229. PubMed ID: 30844320 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Getting to yes: the fate of neuroradiology manuscripts rejected by radiology over a 2-year period. Khosla A; McDonald RJ; Bornmann L; Kallmes DF Radiology; 2011 Jul; 260(1):3-5. PubMed ID: 21697305 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. [Der Orthopäde and the impact factor]. Kohn D; Ewerbeck V Orthopade; 2015 Oct; 44(10):741. PubMed ID: 26376985 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Editorial introspection: problems of a successful peer reviewed journal. Rossdale PD Equine Vet J; 1998 Jan; 30(1):4-5. PubMed ID: 9480209 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Peer review: what is it all about? Parish LC Skinmed; 2008; 7(1):6-7. PubMed ID: 18174794 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Peer review: a castle built on sand or the bedrock of scientific publishing? Berger E Ann Emerg Med; 2006 Feb; 47(2):157-9. PubMed ID: 16435419 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Would you buy a used car from this editor? Nazarian LN J Ultrasound Med; 2013 Jul; 32(7):1107-8. PubMed ID: 23804332 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. A reader and author respond to "The end of peer review and traditional publishing as we know it". Jones V Medscape J Med; 2009; 11(1):17; author reply 17. PubMed ID: 19295938 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. How does peer review work? Aaron L Radiol Technol; 2008; 79(6):553-4. PubMed ID: 18650531 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. What do journal editors want? … and everything you wanted to know about the peer review process for journal publication. Muir-Cochrane E Nurs Health Sci; 2013 Sep; 15(3):263-4. PubMed ID: 24021114 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Science and scholarship: ten volumes of the Journal Hospital Medicine. Auerbach A J Hosp Med; 2015 Jan; 10(1):64-6. PubMed ID: 25470813 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. A new Editorial Board of Monaldi archives for chest disease. Spanevello A; Balbi B Monaldi Arch Chest Dis; 2004; 61(1):2-3. PubMed ID: 15366328 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Peer Review of a Manuscript Submission: A How-To Guide for Effective and Efficient Commentary. Allen LA; Ho PM Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes; 2017 Dec; 10(12):. PubMed ID: 29237748 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. No crisis in supply of peer reviewers. Vines T; Rieseberg L; Smith H Nature; 2010 Dec; 468(7327):1041. PubMed ID: 21179154 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Training and experience of peer reviewers: an additional variable to consider. Kulstad E PLoS Med; 2007 Mar; 4(3):e143; author reply e145. PubMed ID: 17388681 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]