1391 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12965983)
1. Evaluation of abnormal mammography results and palpable breast abnormalities.
Kerlikowske K; Smith-Bindman R; Ljung BM; Grady D
Ann Intern Med; 2003 Aug; 139(4):274-84. PubMed ID: 12965983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Interventional breast procedures.
de Paredes ES; Langer TG; Cousins J
Curr Probl Diagn Radiol; 1998; 27(5):133-84. PubMed ID: 9794095
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Follow-up of palpable circumscribed noncalcified solid breast masses at mammography and US: can biopsy be averted?
Graf O; Helbich TH; Fuchsjaeger MH; Hopf G; Morgun M; Graf C; Mallek R; Sickles EA
Radiology; 2004 Dec; 233(3):850-6. PubMed ID: 15486217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Stereotactic and sonographic large-core biopsy of nonpalpable breast lesions: results of the Radiologic Diagnostic Oncology Group V study.
Fajardo LL; Pisano ED; Caudry DJ; Gatsonis CA; Berg WA; Connolly J; Schnitt S; Page DL; McNeil BJ;
Acad Radiol; 2004 Mar; 11(3):293-308. PubMed ID: 15035520
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The palpable breast lump: information and recommendations to assist decision-making when a breast lump is detected. The Steering Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Care and Treatment of Breast Cancer. Canadian Association of Radiation Oncologists.
CMAJ; 1998 Feb; 158 Suppl 3():S3-8. PubMed ID: 9484272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Fine-needle aspiration of clinically suspicious palpable breast masses with histopathologic correlation.
Ariga R; Bloom K; Reddy VB; Kluskens L; Francescatti D; Dowlat K; Siziopikou P; Gattuso P
Am J Surg; 2002 Nov; 184(5):410-3. PubMed ID: 12433603
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Solid nonpalpable breast lesions. Success and failure of guided fine-needle aspiration cytology in a consecutive series of 2444 cases.
Ciatto S; Rosselli Del Turco M; Ambrogetti D; Bravetti P; Catarzi S; Morrone D; Cariaggi MP
Acta Radiol; 1997 Sep; 38(5):815-20. PubMed ID: 9332236
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Breast fine needle aspiration cytology. Utility as a screening tool for clinically palpable lesions.
Costa MJ; Tadros T; Hilton G; Birdsong G
Acta Cytol; 1993; 37(4):461-71. PubMed ID: 8328240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Combined fine-needle aspiration, physical examination and mammography in the diagnosis of palpable breast masses: their relation to outcome for women with primary breast cancer.
Steinberg JL; Trudeau ME; Ryder DE; Fishell E; Chapman JA; McCready DR; Fish EB; Hiraki GY; Ross TM; Lickley LA
Can J Surg; 1996 Aug; 39(4):302-11. PubMed ID: 8697321
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A modified triple test for palpable breast masses: the value of ultrasound and core needle biopsy.
Wai CJ; Al-Mubarak G; Homer MJ; Goldkamp A; Samenfeld-Specht M; Lee Y; Logvinenko T; Rothschild JG; Graham RA
Ann Surg Oncol; 2013 Mar; 20(3):850-5. PubMed ID: 23104707
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Clinical management of nonpalpable or small breast masses by fine-needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB) under ultrasound guidance.
Okamoto H; Ogawara T; Inoue S; Kobayashi K; Sekikawa T; Matsumoto Y
J Surg Oncol; 1998 Apr; 67(4):246-50. PubMed ID: 9579372
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Accuracy of mammographic appearances after breast fine-needle aspiration.
Hindle WH; Chen EC
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1997 Jun; 176(6):1286-90; discussion 1290-2. PubMed ID: 9215186
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Palpable breast masses with probably benign morphology at sonography: can biopsy be deferred?
Park YM; Kim EK; Lee JH; Ryu JH; Han SS; Choi SJ; Lee SJ; Yoon HK
Acta Radiol; 2008 Dec; 49(10):1104-11. PubMed ID: 18855166
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Ultrasound follow-up of palpable solid, probably benign breast lesions (BI-RADS category III)].
Graf O; Helbich TH; Fuchsjäger MH; Hopf G; Morgun M; Graf C; Mallek R
Rofo; 2004 Sep; 176(9):1251-6. PubMed ID: 15346259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Use of fine needle aspiration for solid breast lesions is accurate and cost-effective.
Rubin M; Horiuchi K; Joy N; Haun W; Read R; Ratzer E; Fenoglio M
Am J Surg; 1997 Dec; 174(6):694-6; discussion 697-8. PubMed ID: 9409599
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Clinically palpable breast abnormalities with normal imaging: is clinically guided biopsy still required?
Gumus H; Gumus M; Mills P; Fish D; Devalia H; Jones SE; Jones PA; Sever AR
Clin Radiol; 2012 May; 67(5):437-40. PubMed ID: 22119297
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Palpable breast abnormalities in women under age 40.
Lee MV; Shaw HL; Chi T; Brazeal HA; Holley SO; Appleton CM
Breast J; 2018 Sep; 24(5):798-805. PubMed ID: 29687544
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Solid breast lesions: diagnosis with US-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy.
Gordon PB; Goldenberg SL; Chan NH
Radiology; 1993 Nov; 189(2):573-80. PubMed ID: 8210392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluation of palpable breast masses.
Klein S
Am Fam Physician; 2005 May; 71(9):1731-8. PubMed ID: 15887452
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. False-negative rate of combined mammography and ultrasound for women with palpable breast masses.
Chan CH; Coopey SB; Freer PE; Hughes KS
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2015 Oct; 153(3):699-702. PubMed ID: 26341750
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
