1394 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12965983)
61. Diagnostic tests in breast cancer. Clinical strategies based on diagnostic probabilities.
Mushlin AI
Ann Intern Med; 1985 Jul; 103(1):79-85. PubMed ID: 3890659
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
62. Risk Stratification of Breast Fine-Needle Aspiration Biopsy Specimens Performed without Radiologic Guidance by Application of the International Academy of Cytology Yokohama System for Reporting Breast Fine-Needle Aspiration Cytopathology.
Sarangi S; Rao M; Elhence PA; Nalwa A; Bharti JN; Khera S; Vedant D; Vishwajeet V; Vishnoi JR; Sharma N; Pareek P
Acta Cytol; 2021; 65(6):483-493. PubMed ID: 34535580
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
63. The predictive value of three diagnostic procedures in the evaluation of palpable breast tumours.
Crone P; Hertz J; Nilsson T; Junge J; Høier-Madsen K; Kennedy M; Bojsen-Møller J; Diepeveen P; Hahn-Pedersen A; Jørgensen SJ
Ann Chir Gynaecol; 1984; 73(5):273-6. PubMed ID: 6524859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
64. Nonpalpable breast lesions: evaluation by means of fine-needle aspiration cytology.
Hann L; Ducatman BS; Wang HH; Fein V; McIntire JM
Radiology; 1989 May; 171(2):373-6. PubMed ID: 2539608
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
65. Usefulness of the triple test score for palpable breast masses; discussion 1012-3.
Morris KT; Pommier RF; Morris A; Schmidt WA; Beagle G; Alexander PW; Toth-Fejel S; Schmidt J; Vetto JT
Arch Surg; 2001 Sep; 136(9):1008-12. PubMed ID: 11529822
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
66. Clinical decision-making in atypical and suspicious categories in fine-needle aspiration cytology of the breast.
Gipponi M; Fregatti P; Garlaschi A; Calabrese M; Baccini P; Gallo M; Murelli F; Margarino C; Bobbio C; Friedman D
Anticancer Res; 2015 Apr; 35(4):2369-74. PubMed ID: 25862902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
67. [Non palpable lesions of the breast: the Mammotome-biopsy in the preoperative management of breast cancer].
Ceccarelli G; Casciola L; Battistini I; Stefanoni M; Spaziani A; Conti D; Di Zitti L; Valeri R; Bartoli A; Bellochi R; Rambotti M; Pisanelli MC
G Chir; 2005 May; 26(5):187-93. PubMed ID: 16184700
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
68. [Diagnostic framework of nonpalpable lesions of the breast].
Ciatto S; Rosselli Del Turco M
Chir Ital; 1995; 47(4):5-8. PubMed ID: 9005133
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
69. The role and histological classification of needle core biopsy in comparison with fine needle aspiration cytology in the preoperative assessment of impalpable breast lesions.
Ibrahim AE; Bateman AC; Theaker JM; Low JL; Addis B; Tidbury P; Rubin C; Briley M; Royle GT
J Clin Pathol; 2001 Feb; 54(2):121-5. PubMed ID: 11215280
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
70. Short-term follow-up results in 795 nonpalpable probably benign lesions detected at screening mammography.
Vizcaíno I; Gadea L; Andreo L; Salas D; Ruiz-Perales F; Cuevas D; Herranz C; Bueno F;
Radiology; 2001 May; 219(2):475-83. PubMed ID: 11323475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
71. Mammographic characteristics and vacuum-assisted breast biopsy (VABB) of non-palpable breast lesions.
Ventrella V; Tufaro A; Zito FA; Addante M; Stea B; Dentamaro R; D'Amico C; Paradiso A
Acta Radiol; 2011 Jul; 52(6):602-7. PubMed ID: 21565889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
72. Image guided versus palpation guided core needle biopsy of palpable breast masses: a prospective study.
Hari S; Kumari S; Srivastava A; Thulkar S; Mathur S; Veedu PT
Indian J Med Res; 2016 May; 143(5):597-604. PubMed ID: 27488003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
73. [Results of stereotactic breast biopsy in mammographically suspicious lesions].
Jäger HJ; Schatz TH; Mehring UM; Kubasch M; Hennigs S; Gissler HM; Spörl HD; Mathias KD
Rofo; 2000 Apr; 172(4):346-53. PubMed ID: 10961219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
74. Accurate evaluation of palpable breast masses by the triple test score.
Morris A; Pommier RF; Schmidt WA; Shih RL; Alexander PW; Vetto JT
Arch Surg; 1998 Sep; 133(9):930-4. PubMed ID: 9749842
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
75. [Fine needle aspiration biopsy of breast lesions: institutional experience].
Medina-Franco H; Abarca-Pérez L; Cortés-González R; Soto-Germes S; Ulloa JA; Uribe N
Rev Invest Clin; 2005; 57(3):394-8. PubMed ID: 16187698
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
76. A comparative analysis of core needle biopsy and fine-needle aspiration cytology in the evaluation of palpable and mammographically detected suspicious breast lesions.
Garg S; Mohan H; Bal A; Attri AK; Kochhar S
Diagn Cytopathol; 2007 Nov; 35(11):681-9. PubMed ID: 17924407
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
77. Clinical utility of bilateral whole-breast US in the evaluation of women with dense breast tissue.
Kaplan SS
Radiology; 2001 Dec; 221(3):641-9. PubMed ID: 11719658
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
78. Triple assessment of breast lump.
Ahmed I; Nazir R; Chaudhary MY; Kundi S
J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2007 Sep; 17(9):535-8. PubMed ID: 17903400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
79. Wire-guided biopsies of nonpalpable breast lesions.
Ahovuo J; Kinnunen J; von Smitten K; Edgren J
Ann Chir Gynaecol; 1990; 79(2):82-4. PubMed ID: 2386362
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
80. Clinical Value of Mammography in the Evaluation of Palpable Breast Lumps in Women 30 Years Old and Older.
Brown AL; Phillips J; Slanetz PJ; Fein-Zachary V; Venkataraman S; Dialani V; Mehta TS
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2017 Oct; 209(4):935-942. PubMed ID: 28777649
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
