These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12966290)

  • 1. Explicit finite element simulation of eccentric loading in total knee replacement.
    Taylor M; Barrett DS
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2003 Sep; (414):162-71. PubMed ID: 12966290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. In vivo contact stresses during activities of daily living after knee arthroplasty.
    D'Lima DD; Steklov N; Fregly BJ; Banks SA; Colwell CW
    J Orthop Res; 2008 Dec; 26(12):1549-55. PubMed ID: 18524001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effect of varus/valgus malalignment on bone strains in the proximal tibia after TKR: an explicit finite element study.
    Perillo-Marcone A; Taylor M
    J Biomech Eng; 2007 Feb; 129(1):1-11. PubMed ID: 17227092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Explicit finite element modeling of total knee replacement mechanics.
    Halloran JP; Petrella AJ; Rullkoetter PJ
    J Biomech; 2005 Feb; 38(2):323-31. PubMed ID: 15598460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effects of knee simulator loading and alignment variability on predicted implant mechanics: a probabilistic study.
    Laz PJ; Pal S; Fields A; Petrella AJ; Rullkoetter PJ
    J Orthop Res; 2006 Dec; 24(12):2212-21. PubMed ID: 17004268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of long-term numerical and experimental total knee replacement wear during simulated gait loading.
    Knight LA; Pal S; Coleman JC; Bronson F; Haider H; Levine DL; Taylor M; Rullkoetter PJ
    J Biomech; 2007; 40(7):1550-8. PubMed ID: 17084405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. In vivo medial and lateral tibial loads during dynamic and high flexion activities.
    Zhao D; Banks SA; D'Lima DD; Colwell CW; Fregly BJ
    J Orthop Res; 2007 May; 25(5):593-602. PubMed ID: 17290383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Finite element analysis of a total ankle replacement during the stance phase of gait.
    Reggiani B; Leardini A; Corazza F; Taylor M
    J Biomech; 2006; 39(8):1435-43. PubMed ID: 15950979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Kinematics of mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty.
    Dennis DA; Komistek RD
    Instr Course Lect; 2005; 54():207-20. PubMed ID: 15948448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Gait cycle finite element comparison of rotating-platform total knee designs.
    Otto JK; Callaghan JJ; Brown TD
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2003 May; (410):181-8. PubMed ID: 12771829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A cadaverically evaluated dynamic FEM model of closed-chain TKR mechanics.
    Lanovaz JL; Ellis RE
    J Biomech Eng; 2009 May; 131(5):051002. PubMed ID: 19388772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Multicenter determination of in vivo kinematics after total knee arthroplasty.
    Dennis DA; Komistek RD; Mahfouz MR; Haas BD; Stiehl JB
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2003 Nov; (416):37-57. PubMed ID: 14646738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Verification of predicted knee replacement kinematics during simulated gait in the Kansas knee simulator.
    Halloran JP; Clary CW; Maletsky LP; Taylor M; Petrella AJ; Rullkoetter PJ
    J Biomech Eng; 2010 Aug; 132(8):081010. PubMed ID: 20670059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Retrieval, experimental, and computational assessment of the performance of total knee replacements.
    Rawlinson JJ; Furman BD; Li S; Wright TM; Bartel DL
    J Orthop Res; 2006 Jul; 24(7):1384-94. PubMed ID: 16705715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Study of micromotion in modular acetabular components during gait and subluxation: a finite element investigation.
    Amirouche F; Romero F; Gonzalez M; Aram L
    J Biomech Eng; 2008 Apr; 130(2):021002. PubMed ID: 18412489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Sensitivity of tibio-menisco-femoral joint contact behavior to variations in knee kinematics.
    Yao J; Salo AD; Lee J; Lerner AL
    J Biomech; 2008; 41(2):390-8. PubMed ID: 17950743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Two-dimensional surrogate contact modeling for computationally efficient dynamic simulation of total knee replacements.
    Lin YC; Haftka RT; Queipo NV; Fregly BJ
    J Biomech Eng; 2009 Apr; 131(4):041010. PubMed ID: 19275439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Probabilistic finite element prediction of knee wear simulator mechanics.
    Laz PJ; Pal S; Halloran JP; Petrella AJ; Rullkoetter PJ
    J Biomech; 2006; 39(12):2303-10. PubMed ID: 16185700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Dynamic finite element knee simulation for evaluation of knee replacement mechanics.
    Baldwin MA; Clary CW; Fitzpatrick CK; Deacy JS; Maletsky LP; Rullkoetter PJ
    J Biomech; 2012 Feb; 45(3):474-83. PubMed ID: 22209313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Increased conformity offers diminishing returns for reducing total knee replacement wear.
    Fregly BJ; Marquez-Barrientos C; Banks SA; DesJardins JD
    J Biomech Eng; 2010 Feb; 132(2):021007. PubMed ID: 20370244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.