These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12966804)
1. [Comparison of neural response telemetry thresholds with behavioral T/C levels]. Chen X; Han D; Zhao X; Wang S; Kong Y; Liu S; Mo L; Liu B; Wu Y Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Ke Za Zhi; 2002 Dec; 37(6):435-9. PubMed ID: 12966804 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Relation between neural response telemetry thresholds, T- and C-levels, and loudness judgments in 12 adult nucleus 24 cochlear implant recipients. Potts LG; Skinner MW; Gotter BD; Strube MJ; Brenner CA Ear Hear; 2007 Aug; 28(4):495-511. PubMed ID: 17609612 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Correlation between NRT measurement and behavioural levels in patients with the Nucleus 24 cochlear implant. Di Nardo W; Ippolito S; Quaranta N; Cadoni G; Galli J Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital; 2003 Oct; 23(5):352-5. PubMed ID: 15108484 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Neural response telemetry with the nucleus CI24M cochlear implant. Shallop JK; Facer GW; Peterson A Laryngoscope; 1999 Nov; 109(11):1755-9. PubMed ID: 10569402 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Correlation between NRT measurement level and behavioral levels in pediatrics cochlear implant patients. Muhaimeed HA; Anazy FA; Hamed O; Shubair E Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2010 Apr; 74(4):356-60. PubMed ID: 20074818 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Differences between electrically evoked compound action potential (ECAP) and behavioral measures in children with cochlear implants operated in the school age vs. operated in the first years of life. Vlahović S; Šindija B; Aras I; Glunčić M; Trotić R Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2012 May; 76(5):731-9. PubMed ID: 22398117 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effect of peri-modiolar cochlear implant positioning on auditory nerve responses: a neural response telemetry study. van Weert S; Stokroos RJ; Rikers MM; van Dijk P Acta Otolaryngol; 2005 Jul; 125(7):725-31. PubMed ID: 16012034 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Electrically evoked compound action potential thresholds of pediatric cochlear implant recipients and its clinical application]. Xi X; Hong MD; Han DY; Huang DL; Yang WY Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Ke Za Zhi; 2003 Feb; 38(1):43-6. PubMed ID: 12778767 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Neural response telemetry reconsidered: I. The relevance of ECAP threshold profiles and scaled profiles to cochlear implant fitting. Botros A; Psarros C Ear Hear; 2010 Jun; 31(3):367-79. PubMed ID: 20124902 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Compare NRT threshold and behavior T-level in cochlear implant patients]. Tao Y; Zheng Y; Wang K; Meng Z; Xu K; Xie T Lin Chuang Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2011 Feb; 25(4):162-5. PubMed ID: 21563463 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [The intraoperative application of neural response telemetry with the nucleus CI24M cochlear implant]. Yang H; Tang J; Cao K; Zhu X; Wang Y; Pan T Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Ke Za Zhi; 2001 Oct; 36(5):352-6. PubMed ID: 12761943 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Neural response telemetry in cochlear implant users. Kiss JG; Tóth F; Nagy AL; Jarabin J; Szamosközi A; Torkos A; Jóri J; Czigner J Int Tinnitus J; 2003; 9(1):59-60. PubMed ID: 14763333 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Modeling the relationship between psychophysical perception and electrically evoked compound action potential threshold in young cochlear implant recipients: clinical implications for implant fitting. Thai-Van H; Truy E; Charasse B; Boutitie F; Chanal JM; Cochard N; Piron JP; Ribas S; Deguine O; Fraysse B; Mondain M; Uziel A; Collet L Clin Neurophysiol; 2004 Dec; 115(12):2811-24. PubMed ID: 15546789 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [The clinical application of objective hearing monitoring technology in cochlear implants]. Wang Z; Li W; Tian Y; Jiang X Lin Chuang Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2014 Apr; 28(7):435-9. PubMed ID: 25026815 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluation of NRT and behavioral measures for MAPping elderly cochlear implant users. Pedley K; Psarros C; Gardner-Berry K; Parker A; Purdy SC; Dawson P; Plant K Int J Audiol; 2007 May; 46(5):254-62. PubMed ID: 17487673 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Mandarin speech perception in nucleus CI 24 implantees using MAPs based on neural response telemetry. Sun YS; Wu CM; Liu TC ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec; 2004; 66(5):255-61. PubMed ID: 15583439 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Clinical evaluation of higher stimulation rates in the nucleus research platform 8 system. Plant K; Holden L; Skinner M; Arcaroli J; Whitford L; Law MA; Nel E Ear Hear; 2007 Jun; 28(3):381-93. PubMed ID: 17485987 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Electrode interaction in cochlear implant recipients: comparison of straight and contour electrode arrays. Xi X; Ji F; Han D; Hong M; Chen A ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec; 2009; 71(4):228-37. PubMed ID: 19707042 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Automatic analysis of auditory nerve electrically evoked compound action potential with an artificial neural network. Charasse B; Thai-Van H; Chanal JM; Berger-Vachon C; Collet L Artif Intell Med; 2004 Jul; 31(3):221-9. PubMed ID: 15302088 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Electrically evoked auditory nerve compound action potentials in Nucleus CI24M cochlear implant users]. Zhu X; Cao K; Pan T; Yang H; Wang Y Lin Chuang Er Bi Yan Hou Ke Za Zhi; 2002 Jan; 16(1):5-8. PubMed ID: 11944479 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]