156 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12966950)
1. Environmental report cards.
Schnoor JL
Environ Sci Technol; 2003 Aug; 37(15):271A. PubMed ID: 12966950
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Tracking toxicants: toward a life cycle aware risk assessment.
Kuczenski B; Geyer R; Boughton B
Environ Sci Technol; 2011 Jan; 45(1):45-50. PubMed ID: 20977239
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. The hormesis challenge for environmental health regulators.
Baram PM
Hum Exp Toxicol; 2001 Aug; 20(8):435-8. PubMed ID: 11727796
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Fundamental changes to EPA's research enterprise: the path forward.
Anastas PT
Environ Sci Technol; 2012 Jan; 46(2):580-6. PubMed ID: 22216884
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Human Exposure: the key to better risk assessment.
Wakefield J
Environ Health Perspect; 2000 Dec; 108(12):A559-65. PubMed ID: 11133418
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. e-Junk explosion.
Schmidt CW
Environ Health Perspect; 2002 Apr; 110(4):A188-94. PubMed ID: 11940445
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Biomonitoring. Pollution gets personal.
Stokstad E
Science; 2004 Jun; 304(5679):1892-4. PubMed ID: 15218119
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Data gaps limit success of national indicators.
Cooney CM
Environ Sci Technol; 2003 Nov; 37(21):382A-383A. PubMed ID: 14620798
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. The beat goes on: researchers consider aging baby boomers' health.
Cooney CM
Environ Sci Technol; 2003 Aug; 37(15):272A-273A. PubMed ID: 12966951
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Tight deadlines and data gaps fan fight on pesticide safety.
Reichhardt T
Nature; 1998 Nov; 396(6708):207. PubMed ID: 9834026
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Scientific issues in the U.S. EPA Framework for Metals Risk Assessment.
Bradham K; Wentsel R
J Toxicol Environ Health A; 2010; 73(2):108-13. PubMed ID: 20077282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Is sludge safe?
Renner R
Environ Health Perspect; 2002 Nov; 110(11):A667. PubMed ID: 12440397
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. New toxic emerging contaminants: beyond the toxicological effects.
Lodeiro C; Capelo JL; Oliveira E; Lodeiro JF
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2019 Jan; 26(1):1-4. PubMed ID: 30171530
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. A critical review of the U.S. EPA's risk assessment for the land application of sewage sludge.
Mathney JM
New Solut; 2011; 21(1):43-56. PubMed ID: 21411425
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency strategic plan for evaluating the toxicity of chemicals.
Firestone M; Kavlock R; Zenick H; Kramer M;
J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev; 2010 Feb; 13(2-4):139-62. PubMed ID: 20574895
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Pharmaceuticals in the environment, a prescription for disaster?
Agamuthu P; Fauziah SH
Waste Manag Res; 2011 Apr; 29(4):349-50. PubMed ID: 21444587
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Mystery in a bottle: will the EPA require public disclosure of inert pesticide ingredients?
Weinhold B
Environ Health Perspect; 2010 Apr; 118(4):A168-71. PubMed ID: 20359978
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Cleaning up the EPA's act.
Nat Struct Mol Biol; 2008 Apr; 15(4):331. PubMed ID: 18388904
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Response to Wolbarst and Mauro.
Van Verst SP; Wells DP
Health Phys; 1998 Jan; 74(1):115-7. PubMed ID: 9415591
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. A new paradigm for clean water infrastructure.
Sandino J
Water Environ Res; 2006 Jan; 78(1):3. PubMed ID: 16553159
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
