These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

108 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12966960)

  • 1. Dramatically improved mercury removal.
    Betts K
    Environ Sci Technol; 2003 Aug; 37(15):283A-284A. PubMed ID: 12966960
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Capturing mercury with ultraviolet light.
    Gorss J
    Environ Sci Technol; 2004 May; 38(9):158A-159A. PubMed ID: 15180041
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Synergistic mercury removal by conventional pollutant control strategies for coal-fired power plants in China.
    Wang S; Zhang L; Wu Y; Ancora MP; Zhao Y; Hao J
    J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2010 Jun; 60(6):722-30. PubMed ID: 20564998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The role of pressure drop and flow redistribution on modeling mercury control using sorbent injection in baghouse filters.
    Flora JR; Hargis RA; O'Dowd WJ; Karash A; Pennline HW; Vidic RD
    J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2006 Mar; 56(3):343-9. PubMed ID: 16573197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Biomass gasification chars for mercury capture from a simulated flue gas of coal combustion.
    Fuente-Cuesta A; Diaz-Somoano M; Lopez-Anton MA; Cieplik M; Fierro JL; Martínez-Tarazona MR
    J Environ Manage; 2012 May; 98():23-8. PubMed ID: 22325640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Mercury emissions from coal combustion: modeling and comparison of Hg capture in a fabric filter versus an electrostatic precipitator.
    Scala F; Clack HL
    J Hazard Mater; 2008 Apr; 152(2):616-23. PubMed ID: 17703878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Mercury control costs drop.
    Cooney CM
    Environ Sci Technol; 2007 Feb; 41(4):1061-2. PubMed ID: 17593698
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Economic analysis of atmospheric mercury emission control for coal-fired power plants in China.
    Ancora MP; Zhang L; Wang S; Schreifels J; Hao J
    J Environ Sci (China); 2015 Jul; 33():125-34. PubMed ID: 26141885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A mechanistic model for mercury capture with in situ-generated titania particles: role of water vapor.
    Rodríguez S; Almquist C; Lee TG; Furuuchi M; Hedrick E; Biswas P
    J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2004 Feb; 54(2):149-56. PubMed ID: 14977316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The thief process for mercury removal from flue gas.
    Granite EJ; Freeman MC; Hargis RA; O'Dowd WJ; Pennline HW
    J Environ Manage; 2007 Sep; 84(4):628-34. PubMed ID: 16959396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. An electrochemical system for removing and recovering elemental mercury from a gas stream.
    Bolger PT; Szlag DC
    Environ Sci Technol; 2002 Oct; 36(20):4430-5. PubMed ID: 12387419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Wisconsin pulls out ahead on mercury controls.
    Cooney CM
    Environ Sci Technol; 2002 Dec; 36(23):440A-441A. PubMed ID: 12523392
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Removal of gaseous elemental mercury over cerium doped low vanadium loading V2O5-WO3/TiO2 in simulated coal-fired flue gas].
    Wan Q; Duan L; He KB; Chen L; Li JH
    Huan Jing Ke Xue; 2011 Sep; 32(9):2800-4. PubMed ID: 22165254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Removal and recovery of gas-phase element mercury by metal oxide-loaded activated carbon.
    Mei Z; Shen Z; Zhao Q; Wang W; Zhang Y
    J Hazard Mater; 2008 Apr; 152(2):721-9. PubMed ID: 17765397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Significance of RuO2 modified SCR catalyst for elemental mercury oxidation in coal-fired flue gas.
    Yan N; Chen W; Chen J; Qu Z; Guo Y; Yang S; Jia J
    Environ Sci Technol; 2011 Jul; 45(13):5725-30. PubMed ID: 21662986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Removal of NO and Hg0 in flue gas using alkaline absorption enhanced by non-thermal plasma].
    Luo HJ; Zhu TL; Wang MY
    Huan Jing Ke Xue; 2010 Jun; 31(6):1682-7. PubMed ID: 20698290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The role of iodine monochloride for the oxidation of elemental mercury.
    Qu Z; Yan N; Liu P; Jia J; Yang S
    J Hazard Mater; 2010 Nov; 183(1-3):132-7. PubMed ID: 20674159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A novel oxidative method for the absorption of Hg(0) from flue gas of coal fired power plants using task specific ionic liquid scrubber.
    Barnea Z; Sachs T; Chidambaram M; Sasson Y
    J Hazard Mater; 2013 Jan; 244-245():495-500. PubMed ID: 23199593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Bromine chloride as an oxidant to improve elemental mercury removal from coal-fired flue gas.
    Qu Z; Yan N; Liu P; Chi Y; Jia J
    Environ Sci Technol; 2009 Nov; 43(22):8610-5. PubMed ID: 20028060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Preliminary estimates of performance and cost of mercury control technology applications on electric utility boilers.
    Srivastava RK; Sedman CB; Kilgroe JD; Smith D; Renninger S
    J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2001 Oct; 51(10):1460-70. PubMed ID: 11686251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.