402 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12968137)
21. Bioweapons. Panel wants U.S. program to retain its Russian roots.
Bhattacharjee Y
Science; 2007 Sep; 317(5846):1845. PubMed ID: 17901303
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Biodefence plans earn lukewarm response from US academics.
Check E
Nature; 2003 Mar; 422(6929):245-6. PubMed ID: 12646880
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Enough biodefence.
Nature; 2006 Nov; 444(7115):2. PubMed ID: 17080039
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Biodefence takes its toll.
Nature; 2003 Jun; 423(6940):571. PubMed ID: 12789296
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. 2004 budget request. Protecting the homeland sets tone for 2004 budget.
Malakoff D
Science; 2003 Feb; 299(5608):806-8. PubMed ID: 12574594
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Bioterrorism. Congress adopts tough rules for labs.
Malakoff D
Science; 2002 May; 296(5573):1585-7. PubMed ID: 12040151
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Research funding. U.S. biodefense boom: eight new study centers.
Malakoff D
Science; 2003 Sep; 301(5639):1450-1. PubMed ID: 12970522
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. A shocking biodefense editorial.
Vanderwagen WC
Nat Biotechnol; 2007 Oct; 25(10):1083; author reply 1083-4. PubMed ID: 17921983
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Residents force review of biodefence lab.
Dalton R
Nature; 2002 Oct; 419(6906):423. PubMed ID: 12368825
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Biomedical research--an integral component of national security.
Hirschberg R; La Montagne J; Fauci AS
N Engl J Med; 2004 May; 350(21):2119-21. PubMed ID: 15152055
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Fight against terror 'needs science institute'.
Check E
Nature; 2002 Jun; 417(6892):887. PubMed ID: 12087368
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Plans to step up bioterrorism research via the NIH.
Cimons M
Nat Med; 2002 Jan; 8(1):6. PubMed ID: 11786885
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Show us the money.
Kennedy D
Science; 2006 Dec; 314(5805):1515. PubMed ID: 17158292
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. France. Will French science swallow Zerhouni's strong medicine?
Enserink M
Science; 2008 Nov; 322(5906):1312. PubMed ID: 19039109
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Biodefence on the research agenda.
Fauci AS
Nature; 2003 Feb; 421(6925):787. PubMed ID: 12594484
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Research mired in Homeland Security delays.
Brumfiel G
Nature; 2003 Aug; 424(6952):986. PubMed ID: 12944931
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Science policy. Caught in the squeeze.
Mervis J
Science; 2005 Feb; 307(5711):832-4. PubMed ID: 15705818
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Science and government. Biosecurity and research: minimizing adverse impacts.
Gaudioso J; Salerno RM
Science; 2004 Apr; 304(5671):687. PubMed ID: 15118148
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Capital collaboration Washington DC.
Russo E
Nature; 2005 Feb; 433(7026):664-5. PubMed ID: 15703754
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. An open letter to Elias Zerhouni.
Altman S; Bassler BL; Beckwith J; Belfort M; Berg HC; Bloom B; Brenchley JE; Campbell A; Collier RJ; Connell N; Cozzarelli NR; Craig NL; Darst S; Ebright RH; Elledge SJ; Falkow S; Galan JE; Gottesman M; Gourse R; Grindley ND; Gross CA; Grossman A; Hochschild A; Howe M; Hurwitz J; Isberg RR; Kaplan S; Kornberg A; Kustu SG; Landick RC; Landy A; Levy SB; Losick R; Long SR; Maloy SR; Mekalanos JJ; Neidhardt FC; Pace NR; Ptashne M; Roberts JW; Roth JR; Rothman-Denes LB; Salyers A; Schaechter M; Shapiro L; Silhavy TJ; Simon MI; Walker G; Yanofsky C; Zinder N
Science; 2005 Mar; 307(5714):1409-10. PubMed ID: 15746409
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
