These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
4. Novel "biomechanical" polymeric valve prostheses with special design for aortic and mitral position: a future option for pediatric patients? Sachweh JS; Daebritz SH ASAIO J; 2006; 52(5):575-80. PubMed ID: 16966862 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Morphologic findings in explanted Hancock II porcine bioprostheses. Butany J; Yu W; Silver MD; David TE J Heart Valve Dis; 1999 Jan; 8(1):4-15. PubMed ID: 10096476 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comprehensive echocardiographic assessment of normal mitral Medtronic Hancock II, Medtronic Mosaic, and Carpentier-Edwards Perimount bioprostheses early after implantation. Blauwet LA; Malouf JF; Connolly HM; Hodge DO; Evans KN; Herges RM; Sundt TM; Miller FA J Am Soc Echocardiogr; 2010 Jun; 23(6):656-66. PubMed ID: 20497863 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. First in human implantation of the mechanical expanding Lotus® valve in degenerated surgical valves in mitral position. Schaefer U; Conradi L; Lubos E; Deuschl F; Schofer N; Seiffert M; Treede H; Schirmer J; Reichenspurner H; Blankenberg S Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2015 Dec; 86(7):1280-6. PubMed ID: 26389782 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A randomized assessment of an advanced tissue preservation technology in the juvenile sheep model. Flameng W; Hermans H; Verbeken E; Meuris B J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2015 Jan; 149(1):340-5. PubMed ID: 25439467 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. In-vivo experience with the Triflo trileaflet mechanical heart valve. Gallegos RP; Rivard AL; Suwan PT; Black S; Bertog S; Steinseifer U; Armien A; Lahti M; Bianco RW J Heart Valve Dis; 2006 Nov; 15(6):791-9. PubMed ID: 17152787 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evaluation of stentless kangaroo aortic valves in the mitral position of juvenile sheep. Hodge AJ; Neethling WM; Glancy R J Heart Valve Dis; 2004 Jul; 13(4):681-8. PubMed ID: 15311878 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Late incidence and determinants of reoperation in patients with prosthetic heart valves. Ruel M; Kulik A; Rubens FD; Bédard P; Masters RG; Pipe AL; Mesana TG Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2004 Mar; 25(3):364-70. PubMed ID: 15019662 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Transvenous, antegrade Melody valve-in-valve implantation for bioprosthetic mitral and tricuspid valve dysfunction: a case series in children and adults. Cullen MW; Cabalka AK; Alli OO; Pislaru SV; Sorajja P; Nkomo VT; Malouf JF; Cetta F; Hagler DJ; Rihal CS JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2013 Jun; 6(6):598-605. PubMed ID: 23683739 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The stentless quadrileaflet bovine pericardial mitral valve: echocardiographic assessment. Middlemost SJ; Manga P J Heart Valve Dis; 1999 Mar; 8(2):180-5. PubMed ID: 10224579 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Transfemoral implantation of transcatheter heart valves after deterioration of mitral bioprosthesis or previous ring annuloplasty. Bouleti C; Fassa AA; Himbert D; Brochet E; Ducrocq G; Nejjari M; Ghodbane W; Depoix JP; Nataf P; Vahanian A JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2015 Jan; 8(1 Pt A):83-91. PubMed ID: 25616821 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Trilogy pericardial valve: hemodynamic performance and calcification in adolescent sheep. Flameng W; Meuris B; De Visscher G; Cunanan C; Lane E; Verbeken E; Herijgers P; Herregods MC Ann Thorac Surg; 2008 Feb; 85(2):587-92. PubMed ID: 18222270 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The effective orifice area/patient aortic annulus area ratio: a better way to compare different bioprostheses? A prospective randomized comparison of the Mosaic and Perimount bioprostheses in the aortic position. Eichinger WB; Botzenhardt F; Guenzinger R; Bleiziffer S; Keithahn A; Bauernschmitt R; Lange R J Heart Valve Dis; 2004 May; 13(3):382-8; discussion 388-9. PubMed ID: 15222284 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Mechanical prosthesis is reasonable for mitral valve replacement in patients approximately 65 years of age. Nishida T; Sonoda H; Oishi Y; Tanoue Y; Nakashima A; Shiokawa Y; Tominaga R Ann Thorac Surg; 2013 Nov; 96(5):1614-20. PubMed ID: 23891407 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Structural valve deterioration in mitral replacement surgery: comparison of Carpentier-Edwards supra-annular porcine and perimount pericardial bioprostheses. Eric Jamieson WR; Marchand MA; Pelletier CL; Norton R; Pellerin M; Dubiel TW; Aupart MR; Daenen WJ; Holden MP; David TE; Ryba EA; Anderson WN J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1999 Aug; 118(2):297-304. PubMed ID: 10425003 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Long-term Doppler echocardiographic results of aortic or mitral valve replacement with Biocor porcine bioprosthesis. Mykén PS; Berggren HE; Larsson S; Roberts B; Wallentin I; Caidahl K J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1998 Oct; 116(4):599-608. PubMed ID: 9766588 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]