BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

137 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12970607)

  • 1. Sonographic evaluation of focal asymmetric density of the breast.
    Shetty MK; Watson AB
    Ultrasound Q; 2002 Jun; 18(2):115-21. PubMed ID: 12970607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Prospective evaluation of the value of combined mammographic and sonographic assessment in patients with palpable abnormalities of the breast.
    Shetty MK; Shah YP; Sharman RS
    J Ultrasound Med; 2003 Mar; 22(3):263-8; quiz 269-70. PubMed ID: 12636326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Findings of breast sonography in patients with foal asymmetric breast density on mammography.
    Zare Z; Faghihi Langroudi T
    Iran Red Crescent Med J; 2011 Jun; 13(6):404-6. PubMed ID: 22737502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Sonographic findings in focal fibrocystic changes of the breast.
    Shetty MK; Shah YP
    Ultrasound Q; 2002 Mar; 18(1):35-40. PubMed ID: 12973055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Sonographic Evaluation of Nigerian Women with Mammographic Focal Asymmetric Density.
    Itanyi DU; Ibrahim H; Ka'alu WO
    West Afr J Med; 2024 Mar; 41(3):233-237. PubMed ID: 38785292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Focal asymmetric breast density: mammographic, sonographic and pathological correlation in 97 lesions--a call to restrain biopsies.
    Sperber F; Metser U; Gat A; Shalmon A; Yaal-Hahoshen N
    Isr Med Assoc J; 2007 Oct; 9(10):720-3. PubMed ID: 17987760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Sonographic Evaluation of Clinically Palpable Breast Cancers Invisible on Mammography.
    Durfee SM; Selland DL; Smith DN; Lester SC; Kaelin CM; Meyer JE
    Breast J; 2000 Jul; 6(4):247-251. PubMed ID: 11348373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Analysis of sonographic features in the differentiation of fibroadenoma and invasive ductal carcinoma.
    Skaane P; Engedal K
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1998 Jan; 170(1):109-14. PubMed ID: 9423610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Prospective evaluation of the value of negative sonographic and mammographic findings in patients with palpable abnormalities of the breast.
    Shetty MK; Shah YP
    J Ultrasound Med; 2002 Nov; 21(11):1211-6; quiz 1217-9. PubMed ID: 12418762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Outcome of men presenting with clinical breast problems: the role of mammography and ultrasound.
    Patterson SK; Helvie MA; Aziz K; Nees AV
    Breast J; 2006; 12(5):418-23. PubMed ID: 16958958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Sonographic evaluation of isolated abnormal axillary lymph nodes identified on mammograms.
    Shetty MK; Carpenter WS
    J Ultrasound Med; 2004 Jan; 23(1):63-71. PubMed ID: 14756355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Image presentation. Sonographic appearances of benign and malignant male breast disease with mammographic and pathologic correlation.
    Yitta S; Singer CI; Toth HB; Mercado CL
    J Ultrasound Med; 2010 Jun; 29(6):931-47. PubMed ID: 20498468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Imaging features of focal breast fibrosis: mammographic-pathologic correlation of noncalcified breast lesions.
    Venta LA; Wiley EL; Gabriel H; Adler YT
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1999 Aug; 173(2):309-16. PubMed ID: 10430125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Negative predictive value of sonography with mammography in patients with palpable breast lesions.
    Soo MS; Rosen EL; Baker JA; Vo TT; Boyd BA
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2001 Nov; 177(5):1167-70. PubMed ID: 11641195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Sonographic evaluation of infiltrating lobular carcinoma.
    Butler RS; Venta LA; Wiley EL; Ellis RL; Dempsey PJ; Rubin E
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1999 Feb; 172(2):325-30. PubMed ID: 9930776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Pregnancy- and lactation-associated breast cancer: mammographic and sonographic findings.
    Ahn BY; Kim HH; Moon WK; Pisano ED; Kim HS; Cha ES; Kim JS; Oh KK; Park SH
    J Ultrasound Med; 2003 May; 22(5):491-7; quiz 498-9. PubMed ID: 12751860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Breast infection. Mammographic and sonographic findings with clinical correlation.
    Crowe DJ; Helvie MA; Wilson TE
    Invest Radiol; 1995 Oct; 30(10):582-7. PubMed ID: 8557497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Negative predictive value of sonography and mammography in patients with focal breast pain.
    Tumyan L; Hoyt AC; Bassett LW
    Breast J; 2005; 11(5):333-7. PubMed ID: 16174154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. New York State Breast Density Mandate: Follow-up Data With Screening Sonography.
    Destounis S; Arieno A; Morgan R
    J Ultrasound Med; 2017 Dec; 36(12):2511-2517. PubMed ID: 28656638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Utility of targeted sonography in the evaluation of focal breast pain.
    Leung JW; Kornguth PJ; Gotway MB
    J Ultrasound Med; 2002 May; 21(5):521-6; quiz 528-9. PubMed ID: 12008815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.