BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

151 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12970847)

  • 1. Recent advances in human quantitative-trait-locus mapping: comparison of methods for selected sibling pairs.
    T Cuenco K; Szatkiewicz JP; Feingold E
    Am J Hum Genet; 2003 Oct; 73(4):863-73. PubMed ID: 12970847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Recent advances in human quantitative-trait-locus mapping: comparison of methods for discordant sibling pairs.
    Szatkiewicz JP; T Cuenco K; Feingold E
    Am J Hum Genet; 2003 Oct; 73(4):874-85. PubMed ID: 12970846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A powerful and robust new linkage statistic for discordant sibling pairs.
    Szatkiewicz JP; Feingold E
    Am J Hum Genet; 2004 Nov; 75(5):906-9. PubMed ID: 15368196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. QTL mapping with discordant and concordant sibling pairs: new statistics and new design strategies.
    Szatkiewicz JP; Feingold E
    Genet Epidemiol; 2005 May; 28(4):326-40. PubMed ID: 15662636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Composite statistics for QTL mapping with moderately discordant sibling pairs.
    Forrest WF; Feingold E
    Am J Hum Genet; 2000 May; 66(5):1642-60. PubMed ID: 10762549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Robust score statistics for QTL linkage analysis.
    Bhattacharjee S; Kuo CL; Mukhopadhyay N; Brock GN; Weeks DE; Feingold E
    Am J Hum Genet; 2008 Mar; 82(3):567-82. PubMed ID: 18304491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Robust multipoint identical-by-descent mapping for affected relative pairs.
    Schaid DJ; Sinnwell JP; Thibodeau SN
    Am J Hum Genet; 2005 Jan; 76(1):128-38. PubMed ID: 15573301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Linkage analysis of extremely discordant and concordant sibling pairs identifies quantitative-trait loci that influence variation in the human personality trait neuroticism.
    Fullerton J; Cubin M; Tiwari H; Wang C; Bomhra A; Davidson S; Miller S; Fairburn C; Goodwin G; Neale MC; Fiddy S; Mott R; Allison DB; Flint J
    Am J Hum Genet; 2003 Apr; 72(4):879-90. PubMed ID: 12612864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Extreme rank selections for linkage analysis of quantitative trait loci using selected sib-pairs.
    Zheng G; Ghosh K; Chen Z; Li Z
    Ann Hum Genet; 2006 Nov; 70(Pt 6):857-66. PubMed ID: 17044861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Extreme discordant sib pairs for mapping quantitative trait loci in humans.
    Risch N; Zhang H
    Science; 1995 Jun; 268(5217):1584-9. PubMed ID: 7777857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A gene-model-free method for linkage analysis of a disease-related-trait based on analysis of proband/sibling pairs.
    Sung H; Finch SJ; Ye KQ; Mendell NR
    BMC Genet; 2005 Dec; 6 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S47. PubMed ID: 16451658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Theoretical and empirical power of regression and maximum-likelihood methods to map quantitative trait loci in general pedigrees.
    Yu X; Knott SA; Visscher PM
    Am J Hum Genet; 2004 Jul; 75(1):17-26. PubMed ID: 15152343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Combined linkage and association mapping of quantitative trait loci by multiple markers.
    Jung J; Fan R; Jin L
    Genetics; 2005 Jun; 170(2):881-98. PubMed ID: 15802526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Testing the robustness of the new Haseman-Elston quantitative-trait loci-mapping procedure.
    Allison DB; Fernández JR; Heo M; Beasley TM
    Am J Hum Genet; 2000 Jul; 67(1):249-52. PubMed ID: 10820126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Maximum-Likelihood-Binomial method for genetic model-free linkage analysis of quantitative traits in sibships.
    Alcaïs A; Abel L
    Genet Epidemiol; 1999; 17(2):102-17. PubMed ID: 10414555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A survey of affected-sibship statistics for nonparametric linkage analysis.
    Sengul H; Weeks DE; Feingold E
    Am J Hum Genet; 2001 Jul; 69(1):179-90. PubMed ID: 11404816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Power of regression and maximum likelihood methods to map QTL from sib-pair and DZ twin data.
    Visscher PM; Hopper JL
    Ann Hum Genet; 2001 Nov; 65(Pt 6):583-601. PubMed ID: 11851988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Powerful regression-based quantitative-trait linkage analysis of general pedigrees.
    Sham PC; Purcell S; Cherny SS; Abecasis GR
    Am J Hum Genet; 2002 Aug; 71(2):238-53. PubMed ID: 12111667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Efficiency robust tests for mapping quantitative trait loci using extremely discordant sib pairs.
    Freidlin B; Zheng G; Li Z; Gastwirth JL
    Hum Hered; 2003; 55(2-3):117-24. PubMed ID: 12931050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Locating human quantitative trait loci: guidelines for the selection of sibling pairs for genotyping.
    Eaves L; Meyer J
    Behav Genet; 1994 Sep; 24(5):443-55. PubMed ID: 7993321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.