361 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12971246)
1. Limiting damages for "pain and suffering" in medical malpractice.
Sloan FA
N C Med J; 2003; 64(4):191-4. PubMed ID: 12971246
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. To cap or not to cap. Medical community lobbies for limits on noneconomic damages.
Romano M
Mod Healthc; 2003 Mar; 33(12):10. PubMed ID: 12687996
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Constitutionality of malpractice non-economic damage cap.
Weber RD
Mich Med; 2003; 102(5):7-8. PubMed ID: 14520908
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. A medical mistake.
Schmitt CH
US News World Rep; 2003 Jun 30-Jul 7; 134(23):24, 26-7. PubMed ID: 12858780
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. [Indemnisation for medical and hospital damages. (Law no. 2002-1577 of December 30, 2002 relative to medical civil responsibility].
Villeneuve P
Rev Infirm; 2003 Feb; (88):45-7. PubMed ID: 12696358
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Wisconsin's caps on noneconomic damages in medical malpractice cases: where Wisconsin stands (and should stand) on "tort reform".
Kenitz M
Spec Law Dig Health Care Law; 2006 May; (325):9-32. PubMed ID: 17009664
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Effective legal reform and the malpractice insurance crisis.
Anderson RE
Yale J Health Policy Law Ethics; 2005; 5(1):343-55. PubMed ID: 15742580
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Medical malpractice and patient safety.
Avraham R
N Engl J Med; 2006 Aug; 355(7):735; author reply 736. PubMed ID: 16921589
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Society attacks med mal challenge on multiple levels.
Busalacchi S
WMJ; 2005 Sep; 104(7):11-2. PubMed ID: 16294591
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Medical liability bill passes House for third year in a row.
Med Health; 2005 Aug; 59(27):1, 7-8. PubMed ID: 16111078
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Medical malpractice: trends in litigation.
Floyd TK
Gastroenterology; 2008 Jun; 134(7):1822-5, 1825.e1. PubMed ID: 18482584
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Contingency fee legal actions in the U.S.A.
Hershkowitz L
Med Health R I; 2005 Jan; 88(1):35. PubMed ID: 15779559
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Give a little to get a little? 'Quid pro quo' the key to medical liability caps.
Borges W
Tex Med; 2003 Feb; 99(2):37-40. PubMed ID: 12647630
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Debunking medical malpractice myths: unraveling the false premises behind "tort reform".
Boehm G
Yale J Health Policy Law Ethics; 2005; 5(1):357-69. PubMed ID: 15742581
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Worried in Wisconsin. With damage cap scrapped, panel will study options.
Robeznieks A
Mod Healthc; 2005 Aug; 35(34):56. PubMed ID: 16158568
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Analysis of California's Medical Injury Compensation Review Act (MICRA).
Evans MB
J Med Pract Manage; 2004; 19(6):329-30. PubMed ID: 15293664
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. "The medical liability system is melting down".
Coble YD; Palmisano DJ
Med Econ; 2003 Mar; 80(6):49-50. PubMed ID: 12698626
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Starting over. Docs vow to keep working for malpractice reform.
Fong T
Mod Healthc; 2003 Jul; 33(28):10-1. PubMed ID: 12884705
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. The anatomy of a lawsuit: Part 6.
Ashley RC
Crit Care Nurse; 2003 Aug; 23(4):89. PubMed ID: 12961788
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Could a malpractice mega-verdict wipe you out?
Rice B
Med Econ; 2003 May; 80(10):89-91. PubMed ID: 12828031
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
