BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12972834)

  • 1. Electronic fetal heart rate monitoring: a story of survival.
    Parer JT
    Obstet Gynecol Surv; 2003 Sep; 58(9):561-3. PubMed ID: 12972834
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Why are we using electronic fetal monitoring?
    Kripke CC
    Am Fam Physician; 1999 May; 59(9):2416, 2421-2. PubMed ID: 10323350
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Intrapartum fetal monitoring--a disappointing story.
    Freeman R
    N Engl J Med; 1990 Mar; 322(9):624-6. PubMed ID: 2304509
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Intrapartum electronic fetal heart rate monitoring and the prevention of perinatal brain injury.
    Blander CL
    Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Dec; 108(6):1554; author reply 1554. PubMed ID: 17138796
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. ACOG Practice Bulletin. No. 62: Intrapartum fetal heart rate monitoring.
    ACOG Committee on Practice Bulletins
    Obstet Gynecol; 2005 May; 105(5 Pt 1):1161-9. PubMed ID: 15863569
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Fetal heart rate monitoring: the next step?
    Parer JT; King TL
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2010 Dec; 203(6):520-1. PubMed ID: 21111106
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Polemics in perinatology: the electronic fetal monitoring guidelines.
    Schifrin BS
    J Perinatol; 1990 Jun; 10(2):188-92. PubMed ID: 2358905
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Critique of the quality of clinical studies of intensive fetal monitoring sub partu and subsequent conclusions. Final comment on the article by H. Schneider: "Intensive fetal monitoring sub partu or the quality of clinical research"].
    Saling E
    Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd; 1996 Aug; 56(8):M126-9. PubMed ID: 8974890
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Further concerns about the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development guidelines for interpretation of electronic fetal heart rate monitoring.
    Bernardes J; Ayres-de-Campos D; Costa-Pereira A
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2001 Jun; 184(7):1587-8. PubMed ID: 11408896
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [A new monitoring method for safer child delivery. Lower number of metabolic acidosis cases with fetal ECG and cardiotocography].
    Hagberg H; Amer-Wåhlin I; Herbst A; Lilja H; Norén H; Olofsson P; Marsál K
    Lakartidningen; 2004 Nov; 101(48):3875-6, 3878, 3880-1. PubMed ID: 15631221
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Intrapartum electronic fetal heart rate monitoring and the prevention of perinatal brain injury.
    Graham EM; Petersen SM; Christo DK; Fox HE
    Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Sep; 108(3 Pt 1):656-66. PubMed ID: 16946228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Electronic fetal monitoring. Inherited clinical guidelines.
    Beech BA
    Pract Midwife; 2001; 4(7):31-3. PubMed ID: 12026633
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Fetal surveillance during labor: the role of the expert witness.
    Schifrin BS; Rubinstein TH
    J Perinatol; 1993; 13(2):151-2. PubMed ID: 8515310
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Indications for fetal heart rate monitoring during normal delivery (March 2002)].
    Agence National d'Accréditation et d'Evaluation en Santé
    J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 2003 Apr; 32(2):183-6. PubMed ID: 12717310
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Fetal heart rate monitoring casebook. Fetal heart rate monitoring in diabetic ketoacidosis.
    Gimovsky ML; Eichenlaub J; Keroack E
    J Perinatol; 1993; 13(1):79-82. PubMed ID: 8445453
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Failure to rescue as a process measure to evaluate fetal safety during labor.
    Beaulieu MJ
    MCN Am J Matern Child Nurs; 2009; 34(1):18-23. PubMed ID: 19104315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Developing a tool to appraise fetal monitoring guidelines for women at low obstetric risk.
    Hindley C; Hinsliff SW; Thomson AM
    J Adv Nurs; 2005 Nov; 52(3):307-14. PubMed ID: 16194184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Electronic fetal-heart-rate monitoring as compared with periodic auscultation and the neurologic development of premature infants.
    N Engl J Med; 1990 Aug; 323(5):345-8. PubMed ID: 2366846
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Intrapartum management of nonreassuring fetal heart rate patterns: a randomized controlled trial of fetal pulse oximetry.
    Kühnert M; Schmidt S
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2004 Dec; 191(6):1989-95. PubMed ID: 15592281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Documentation improvements following multidisciplinary educational program on electronic fetal heart rate tracings.
    Vadnais MA; Golen TH
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2011 May; 24(5):741-4. PubMed ID: 21067288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.