166 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12972944)
21. Identification of neonatal hearing impairment: distortion product otoacoustic emissions during the perinatal period.
Gorga MP; Norton SJ; Sininger YS; Cone-Wesson B; Folsom RC; Vohr BR; Widen JE; Neely ST
Ear Hear; 2000 Oct; 21(5):400-24. PubMed ID: 11059701
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Relationships among standard and wideband measures of middle ear function and distortion product otoacoustic emissions.
Schairer KS; Morrison B; Szewczyk E; Fowler CG
J Am Acad Audiol; 2011 May; 22(5):253-64. PubMed ID: 21756841
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. [Effect of inner ear hearing loss on delayed otoacoustic emissions (TEOAE) and distortion products (DPOAE)].
Hoth S
Laryngorhinootologie; 1996 Dec; 75(12):709-18. PubMed ID: 9081275
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Identification of neonatal hearing impairment: evaluation of transient evoked otoacoustic emission, distortion product otoacoustic emission, and auditory brain stem response test performance.
Norton SJ; Gorga MP; Widen JE; Folsom RC; Sininger Y; Cone-Wesson B; Vohr BR; Mascher K; Fletcher K
Ear Hear; 2000 Oct; 21(5):508-28. PubMed ID: 11059707
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Vulnerability of the gerbil cochlea to sound exposure during reversible ischemia.
Mom T; Bonfils P; Gilain L; Avan P
Hear Res; 1999 Oct; 136(1-2):65-74. PubMed ID: 10511625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Test-retest reliability of distortion-product thresholds compared to behavioral auditory thresholds.
Bader K; Dierkes L; Braun LH; Gummer AW; Dalhoff E; Zelle D
Hear Res; 2021 Jul; 406():108232. PubMed ID: 33984603
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Distortion-product otoacoustic emission monitoring of cochlear blood flow.
Telischi FF; Stagner B; Widick MP; Balkany TJ; Lonsbury-Martin BL
Laryngoscope; 1998 Jun; 108(6):837-42. PubMed ID: 9628498
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Distortion-product emissions in rabbit: II. Prediction of chronic-noise effects by brief pure-tone exposures.
Mensh BD; Lonsbury-Martin BL; Martin GK
Hear Res; 1993 Oct; 70(1):65-72. PubMed ID: 8276733
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Effects of furosemide on distortion product otoacoustic emissions and on neuronal responses in the anteroventral cochlear nucleus.
Rübsamen R; Mills DM; Rubel EW
J Neurophysiol; 1995 Oct; 74(4):1628-38. PubMed ID: 8989399
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Simultaneous measurement of electrocochleography and cochlear blood flow during cochlear hypoxia in rabbits.
Yavuz E; Morawski K; Telischi FF; Ozdamar O; Delgado RE; Manns F; Parel JM
J Neurosci Methods; 2005 Aug; 147(1):55-64. PubMed ID: 16054516
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Cochlear ischemia induced by circulating iron particles under magnetic control: an animal model for sudden hearing loss.
Schweinfurth JM; Cacace AT
Am J Otol; 2000 Sep; 21(5):636-40. PubMed ID: 10993450
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Profiles of Stimulus-Frequency Otoacoustic Emissions from 0.5 to 20 kHz in Humans.
Dewey JB; Dhar S
J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2017 Feb; 18(1):89-110. PubMed ID: 27681700
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. A Comparison of Distortion Product Otoacoustic Emission Properties in Ménière's Disease Patients and Normal-Hearing Participants.
Drexl M; Krause E; Gürkov R
Ear Hear; 2018; 39(1):42-47. PubMed ID: 28671918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Distortion-product otoacoustic emissions in middle-aged subjects with normal versus potentially presbyacusic high-frequency hearing loss.
Nieschalk M; Hustert B; Stoll W
Audiology; 1998; 37(2):83-99. PubMed ID: 9547922
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Origin of cubic difference tones generated by high-intensity stimuli: effect of ischemia and auditory fatigue on the gerbil cochlea.
Mom T; Bonfils P; Gilain L; Avan P
J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 Sep; 110(3 Pt 1):1477-88. PubMed ID: 11572358
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. [Contralateral suppression of latency during distortion product otoacoustic emissions detection in guinea pigs].
Kong W; Yang Y; Zhang W
Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Ke Za Zhi; 2001 Aug; 36(4):271-4. PubMed ID: 12761994
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Influence of primary frequencies ratio on distortion product otoacoustic emissions amplitude. II. Interrelations between multicomponent DPOAEs, tone-burst-evoked OAEs, and spontaneous OAEs.
Moulin A
J Acoust Soc Am; 2000 Mar; 107(3):1471-86. PubMed ID: 10738802
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. [Otoacoustic emissions measurements in children during the chemotherapy because of the acute lymphoblastic leukemia].
Lisowska G; Namysłowski G; Hajduk A; Polok A; Tomaszewska R; Misiołek M
Otolaryngol Pol; 2006; 60(3):415-20. PubMed ID: 16989457
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Otoacoustic emissions from ears with spontaneous activity behave differently to those without: Stronger responses to tone bursts as well as to clicks.
Jedrzejczak WW; Kochanek K; Skarzynski H
PLoS One; 2018; 13(2):e0192930. PubMed ID: 29451905
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Influence of calibration method on distortion-product otoacoustic emission measurements: II. threshold prediction.
Rogers AR; Burke SR; Kopun JG; Tan H; Neely ST; Gorga MP
Ear Hear; 2010 Aug; 31(4):546-54. PubMed ID: 20458245
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
