These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

111 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12973297)

  • 1. The performance of projective standardization for digital subtraction radiography.
    Mol A; Dunn SM
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2003 Sep; 96(3):373-82. PubMed ID: 12973297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effect of bone chip orientation on quantitative estimates of changes in bone mass using digital subtraction radiography.
    Mol A; Dunn SM
    J Periodontal Res; 2003 Jun; 38(3):296-302. PubMed ID: 12753368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of peri-implant bone level assessment in digitized conventional radiographs and digital subtraction images.
    Bittar-Cortez JA; Passeri LA; de Almeida SM; Haiter-Neto F
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2006 Jul; 35(4):258-62. PubMed ID: 16798922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The effect of independent film and object rotation on projective geometric standardization of dental radiographs.
    Fisher E; van der Stelt PF; Ostuni J; Dunn SM
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1995 Feb; 24(1):5-12. PubMed ID: 8593908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effect of projective aspects variations on estimates of changes in bone mass using digital subtraction radiography.
    Loftin R; Webber R; Horton R; Tyndall D; Moriarty J
    J Periodontal Res; 1998 Aug; 33(6):352-8. PubMed ID: 9777586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Use of an internal standard in subtraction radiography to assess initial periodontal bone changes.
    Griffiths GS; Brägger U; Fourmousis I; Sterne JA
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1996 Apr; 25(2):76-81. PubMed ID: 9446977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Sensitivity of various radiographic methods for detection of oral cancellous bone lesions.
    Parsell DE; Gatewood RS; Watts JD; Streckfus CF
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1998 Oct; 86(4):498-502. PubMed ID: 9798239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of conventional and TACT (Tuned Aperture Computed Tomography) digital subtraction radiography in detection of pericrestal bone-gain.
    Chai-U-Dom O; Ludlow JB; Tyndall DA; Webber RL
    J Periodontal Res; 2002 Apr; 37(2):147-53. PubMed ID: 12009184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Accuracy of quantitative digital subtraction radiography for determining changes in calcium mass in mandibular bone: an in vitro study.
    Christgau M; Hiller KA; Schmalz G; Kolbeck C; Wenzel A
    J Periodontal Res; 1998 Apr; 33(3):138-49. PubMed ID: 9651875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Influence of developer exhaustion on accuracy of quantitative digital subtraction radiography: an in vitro study.
    Fidler A; Likar B; Pernus F; Skaleric U
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2000 Aug; 90(2):233-9. PubMed ID: 10936844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Influence of contrast enhancement and pseudocolor transformation on the diagnosis with digital subtraction images (DSI).
    Brägger U; Bürgin W; Marconi M; Häsler RU; Lang NP
    J Periodontal Res; 1994 Mar; 29(2):95-102. PubMed ID: 8158504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Clinical validation of a new subtraction radiography technique for periodontal bone loss detection.
    Nummikoski PV; Steffensen B; Hamilton K; Dove SB
    J Periodontol; 2000 Apr; 71(4):598-605. PubMed ID: 10807124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of hard tissue density changes around implants assessed in digitized conventional radiographs and subtraction images.
    Bittar-Cortez JA; Passeri LA; Bóscolo FN; Haiter-Neto F
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2006 Oct; 17(5):560-4. PubMed ID: 16958697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Quantitative digital subtraction radiography for the determination of small changes in bone thickness: an in vitro study.
    Christgau M; Hiller KA; Schmalz G; Kolbeck C; Wenzel A
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1998 Apr; 85(4):462-72. PubMed ID: 9574959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Computer-assisted densitometric image analysis of digital subtraction images: in vivo error of the method and effect of thresholding.
    Brägger U; Bürgin W; Fourmousis I; Schmid G; Schild U; Lang NP
    J Periodontol; 1998 Sep; 69(9):967-74. PubMed ID: 9776024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. An in-vitro evaluation of a dental subtraction radiography system using bone chips on dried human mandibles.
    Rawlinson A; Ellwood RP; Davies RM
    J Clin Periodontol; 1999 Mar; 26(3):138-42. PubMed ID: 10100038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Accuracy in detecting bone lesions in vitro with conventional and subtracted direct digital imaging.
    Stassinakis A; Brägger U; Stojanovic M; Bürgin W; Lussi A; Lang NP
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1995 Nov; 24(4):232-7. PubMed ID: 9161167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of panoramic radiography and panoramic digital subtraction radiography in the detection of simulated osteophytic lesions of the mandibular condyle.
    Masood F; Katz JO; Hardman PK; Glaros AG; Spencer P
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2002 May; 93(5):626-31. PubMed ID: 12075216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Digital subtraction radiography for longitudinal assessment of peri-implant bone change: method and validation.
    Jeffcoat MK; Reddy MS
    Adv Dent Res; 1993 Aug; 7(2):196-201. PubMed ID: 8260008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Standardized lateral oblique projection of the mandible for digital subtraction radiography.
    Araki K; Kitamori H; Yoshiura K; Okuda H; Ohki M
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1992 May; 21(2):88-92. PubMed ID: 1397463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.