143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12974861)
1. Assessing microleakage of different class V restorations after Er:YAG laser and bur preparation.
Corona SA; Borsatto MC; Pecora JD; De SA Rocha RA; Ramos TS; Palma-Dibb RG
J Oral Rehabil; 2003 Oct; 30(10):1008-14. PubMed ID: 12974861
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Microleakage of class V resin composite restorations after bur, air-abrasion or Er:YAG laser preparation.
Corona SA; Borsatto M; Dibb RG; Ramos RP; Brugnera A; Pécora JD
Oper Dent; 2001; 26(5):491-7. PubMed ID: 11551014
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Microleakage of Er:YAG laser and dental bur prepared cavities in primary teeth restored with different adhesive restorative materials.
Baghalian A; Nakhjavani YB; Hooshmand T; Motahhary P; Bahramian H
Lasers Med Sci; 2013 Nov; 28(6):1453-60. PubMed ID: 23135785
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Microleakage on Class V glass ionomer restorations after cavity preparation with aluminum oxide air abrasion.
Corona SA; Borsatto MC; Rocha RA; Palma-Dibb RG
Braz Dent J; 2005; 16(1):35-8. PubMed ID: 16113931
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Microleakage of four different restorative glass ionomer formulations in class V cavities: Er:YAG laser versus conventional preparation.
Delmé KI; Deman PJ; De Bruyne MA; De Moor RJ
Photomed Laser Surg; 2008 Dec; 26(6):541-9. PubMed ID: 19025411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Influence of the use of Er:YAG laser for cavity preparation and surface treatment in microleakage of resin-modified glass ionomer restorations.
Chinelatti MA; Ramos RP; Chimello DT; Borsatto MC; Pécora JD; Palma-Dibb RG
Oper Dent; 2004; 29(4):430-6. PubMed ID: 15279483
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Microleakage of class V glass ionomer restorations after conventional and Er:YAG laser preparation.
Delme KI; Deman PJ; Nammour S; De Moor RJ
Photomed Laser Surg; 2006 Dec; 24(6):715-22. PubMed ID: 17199471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Study of microleakage at Class I cavities prepared by Er:YAG laser using three types of restorative materials.
Khan MF; Yonaga K; Kimura Y; Funato A; Matsumoto K
J Clin Laser Med Surg; 1998 Dec; 16(6):305-8. PubMed ID: 10204435
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Leakage pathway of different nano-restorative materials in class V cavities prepared by Er:YAG laser and bur preparation.
Ozel E; Korkmaz Y; Attar N; Bicer CO; Firatli E
Photomed Laser Surg; 2009 Oct; 27(5):783-9. PubMed ID: 19754249
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. In vitro study of enamel and dentin marginal integrity of composite and compomer restorations placed in primary teeth after diamond or Er:YAG laser cavity preparation.
Stiesch-Scholz M; Hannig M
J Adhes Dent; 2000; 2(3):213-22. PubMed ID: 11317395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Microleakage of Class V resin-modified glass ionomer and compomer restorations.
Toledano M; Osorio E; Osorio R; García-Godoy F
J Prosthet Dent; 1999 May; 81(5):610-5. PubMed ID: 10220667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Microleakage of composite resin restorations in cervical cavities prepared by Er,Cr:YSGG laser radiation.
Shahabi S; Ebrahimpour L; Walsh LJ
Aust Dent J; 2008 Jun; 53(2):172-5. PubMed ID: 18494974
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Marginal microleakage of resin-modified glass-ionomer and composite resin restorations: effect of using etch-and-rinse and self-etch adhesives.
Khoroushi M; Karvandi TM; Kamali B; Mazaheri H
Indian J Dent Res; 2012; 23(3):378-83. PubMed ID: 23059577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Microleakage and polymerization shrinkage of various polymer restorative materials.
Gerdolle DA; Mortier E; Droz D
J Dent Child (Chic); 2008; 75(2):125-33. PubMed ID: 18647507
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Cavity preparation devices: effect on microleakage of Class V resin-based composite restorations.
Setien VJ; Cobb DS; Denehy GE; Vargas MA
Am J Dent; 2001 Jun; 14(3):157-62. PubMed ID: 11572294
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Microleakage of light-cured resin and resin-modified glass-ionomer dentin bonding agents applied with co-cure vs pre-cure technique.
Tulunoglu O; Uçtaşh M; Alaçam A; Omürlü H
Oper Dent; 2000; 25(4):292-8. PubMed ID: 11203833
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Microleakage of class V resin composite restorations after conventional and Er:YAG laser preparation.
Delme KI; Deman PJ; De Moor RJ
J Oral Rehabil; 2005 Sep; 32(9):676-85. PubMed ID: 16102081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Microleakage study of different adhesive systems in Class V cavities prepared by Er,Cr:YSGG laser and bur preparation.
Ergucu Z; Celik EU; Turkun M
Gen Dent; 2007; 55(1):27-32. PubMed ID: 17333962
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effect of laser pretreated enamel and dentin of primary teeth on microleakage of different restorative materials.
Salama FS
J Clin Pediatr Dent; 1998; 22(4):285-91. PubMed ID: 9796497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The influence of finishing time on the marginal seal of a resin-modified glass-ionomer and polyacid-modified resin composite.
Lim CC; Neo J; Yap A
J Oral Rehabil; 1999 Jan; 26(1):48-52. PubMed ID: 10080324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
