213 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12975208)
1. Anatomic reconstruction of the posterior cruciate ligament after multiligament knee injuries. A combination of the tibial-inlay and two-femoral-tunnel techniques.
Noyes FR
Am J Sports Med; 2003; 31(5):812-3; author reply 813-4. PubMed ID: 12975208
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Anatomic reconstruction of the posterior cruciate ligament after multiligament knee injuries. A combination of the tibial-inlay and two-femoral-tunnel techniques.
Stannard JP; Riley RS; Sheils TM; McGwin G; Volgas DA
Am J Sports Med; 2003; 31(2):196-202. PubMed ID: 12642252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The effect of femoral tunnel position on graft forces during inlay posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.
Oakes DA; Markolf KL; McWilliams J; Young CR; McAllister DR
Am J Sports Med; 2003; 31(5):667-72. PubMed ID: 12975184
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Is the all-arthroscopic tibial inlay double-bundle PCL reconstruction a viable option in multiligament knee injuries?
Weber AE; Bissell B; Wojtys EM; Sekiya JK
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2014 Sep; 472(9):2667-79. PubMed ID: 25048278
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The effect of posterior knee capsulotomy on posterior tibial translation during posterior cruciate ligament tibial inlay reconstruction.
Park SE; Stamos BD; DeFrate LE; Gill TJ; Li G
Am J Sports Med; 2004 Sep; 32(6):1514-9. PubMed ID: 15310580
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using single-bundle patella tendon graft with tibial inlay fixation: 2- to 10-year follow-up.
Cooper DE; Stewart D
Am J Sports Med; 2004 Mar; 32(2):346-60. PubMed ID: 14977658
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Biomechanical comparison of tibial inlay and tibial tunnel techniques for reconstruction of the posterior cruciate ligament. Analysis of graft forces.
Oakes DA; Markolf KL; McWilliams J; Young CR; McAllister DR
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2002 Jun; 84(6):938-44. PubMed ID: 12063327
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Arthroscopic tibial inlay for posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.
Campbell RB; Jordan SS; Sekiya JK
Arthroscopy; 2007 Dec; 23(12):1356.e1-4. PubMed ID: 18063182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Biomechanical comparison of tibial inlay versus transtibial techniques for posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: analysis of knee kinematics and graft in situ forces.
Margheritini F; Mauro CS; Rihn JA; Stabile KJ; Woo SL; Harner CD
Am J Sports Med; 2004; 32(3):587-93. PubMed ID: 15090372
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Tibial inlay technique with quadriceps tendon-bone autograft for posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.
Chuang TY; Chen CH; Chou SW; Chen YJ; Chen WJ
Arthroscopy; 2004 Mar; 20(3):331-5. PubMed ID: 15007326
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Posterior cruciate ligament tibial inlay reconstruction.
Berg EE
Arthroscopy; 1995 Feb; 11(1):69-76. PubMed ID: 7727015
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A biomechanical comparison of tibial inlay and tibial tunnel posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction techniques: graft pretension and knee laxity.
McAllister DR; Markolf KL; Oakes DA; Young CR; McWilliams J
Am J Sports Med; 2002; 30(3):312-7. PubMed ID: 12016068
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluation and treatment of posterior cruciate ligament injuries: revisited.
Wind WM; Bergfeld JA; Parker RD
Am J Sports Med; 2004; 32(7):1765-75. PubMed ID: 15494347
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Kinematic analysis of the posterior cruciate ligament, part 2: a comparison of anatomic single- versus double-bundle reconstruction.
Wijdicks CA; Kennedy NI; Goldsmith MT; Devitt BM; Michalski MP; Årøen A; Engebretsen L; LaPrade RF
Am J Sports Med; 2013 Dec; 41(12):2839-48. PubMed ID: 24092043
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Anterior and posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in the new millennium: a global perspective.
Harner CD; Fu FH; Irrgang JJ; Vogrin TM
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2001 Nov; 9(6):330-6. PubMed ID: 11734868
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. The predictive effect of anatomic femoral and tibial graft tunnel placement in posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction on functional and radiological outcome.
Osti M; Hierzer D; Krawinkel A; Hoffelner T; Benedetto KP
Int Orthop; 2015 Jun; 39(6):1181-6. PubMed ID: 25324225
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Single- versus double-bundle PCL reconstruction: a biomechanical analysis.
Giffin JR; Haemmerle MJ; Vogrin TM; Harner CD
J Knee Surg; 2002; 15(2):114-20. PubMed ID: 12013073
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Transtibial versus tibial inlay techniques for posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: long-term follow-up study.
Song EK; Park HW; Ahn YS; Seon JK
Am J Sports Med; 2014 Dec; 42(12):2964-71. PubMed ID: 25288624
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Transtibial double bundle posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using TransFix tibial fixation.
Lee YS; Ahn JH; Jung YB; Wang JH; Yoo JC; Jung HJ; Kang BJ
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2007 Aug; 15(8):973-7. PubMed ID: 17356820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Tibial inlay for posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a systematic review.
Papalia R; Osti L; Del Buono A; Denaro V; Maffulli N
Knee; 2010 Aug; 17(4):264-9. PubMed ID: 20226678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
