75 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1298788)
1. Histomorphometric comparison of canals prepared by four techniques.
Baumgartner JC; Martin H; Sabala CL; Strittmatter EJ; Wildey WL; Quigley NC
J Endod; 1992 Nov; 18(11):530-4. PubMed ID: 1298788
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Apical third instrumentation of curved canals with K-type and canal master instruments.
Shankar P; Parameswaran A; Lakshminarayanan L
J Endod; 1993 May; 19(5):224-7. PubMed ID: 8360597
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of three instruments in the preparation of the curved root canal using the modified double-flared technique.
Saunders WP; Saunders EM
J Endod; 1994 Sep; 20(9):440-4. PubMed ID: 7996114
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effect of noncutting tipped instruments on the quality of root canal preparation using a modified double-flared technique.
Saunders WP; Saunders EM
J Endod; 1992 Jan; 18(1):32-6. PubMed ID: 1402562
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The effects of Canal Master, Flex-R, and K-Flex instrumentation on root canal configuration.
Leseberg DA; Montgomery S
J Endod; 1991 Feb; 17(2):59-65. PubMed ID: 1919403
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A comparison of spreader penetration depth and load required during lateral condensation in teeth prepared using various root canal preparation techniques.
Dulaimi SF; Wali Al-Hashimi MK
Int Endod J; 2005 Aug; 38(8):510-5. PubMed ID: 16011768
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. An in vivo evaluation of the efficacy of ultrasound after step-back preparation in mandibular molars.
Archer R; Reader A; Nist R; Beck M; Meyers WJ
J Endod; 1992 Nov; 18(11):549-52. PubMed ID: 1298792
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of two ultrasonic units in shaping simulated curved canals.
Ahmad M; Pitt Ford TR
J Endod; 1989 Oct; 15(10):457-62. PubMed ID: 2639937
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A novel noninstrumented technique for cleansing the root canal system.
Lussi A; Nussbächer U; Grosrey J
J Endod; 1993 Nov; 19(11):549-53. PubMed ID: 8151242
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Evaluation of four methods of preparing curved canals].
Camps J; Levallois B; Dejou J
Rev Fr Endod; 1990 Mar; 9(1):23-30. PubMed ID: 2382043
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [In vitro comparison of root canal preparation with step-back technique and GT rotary file--a nickel-titanium engine driven rotary instrument system].
Krajczár K; Tóth V; Nyárády Z; Szabó G
Fogorv Sz; 2005 Jun; 98(3):119-23. PubMed ID: 16108416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The efficacy of step-down procedures during endosonic instrumentation.
Murgel C; Walmsley AD; Walton RE
J Endod; 1991 Mar; 17(3):111-5. PubMed ID: 1940723
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. An in vivo comparison of the step-back technique versus a step-back/ultrasonic technique in human mandibular molars.
Haidet J; Reader A; Beck M; Meyers W
J Endod; 1989 May; 15(5):195-9. PubMed ID: 2607289
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. An evaluation of .06 tapered gutta-percha cones for filling of .06 taper prepared curved root canals.
Gordon MP; Love RM; Chandler NP
Int Endod J; 2005 Feb; 38(2):87-96. PubMed ID: 15667630
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Finite element analysis of the effects of three preparation techniques on stresses within roots having curved canals.
Cheng R; Zhou XD; Liu Z; Yang H; Gao QH; Hu T
Int Endod J; 2009 Mar; 42(3):220-6. PubMed ID: 19228212
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A comparison in vitro of two ultrasonic root canal preparation techniques.
Yap SY; Stock CJ
Int Endod J; 1992 Nov; 25(6):297-303. PubMed ID: 1306862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A radiographic comparison of two root canal instrumentation techniques.
Backman CA; Oswald RJ; Pitts DL
J Endod; 1992 Jan; 18(1):19-24. PubMed ID: 1402559
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Preparation of curved root canals using hand instruments and mechanical aids].
Hülsmann M; Bertzbach F
Dtsch Zahnarztl Z; 1989 Jun; 44(6):448-51. PubMed ID: 2630269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effects of four instrumentation techniques on curved canals: a comparison study.
Schäfer E
J Endod; 1996 Dec; 22(12):685-9. PubMed ID: 9220756
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Some modifications to the step-back technique in root canal preparation.
McCabe PS
J Ir Dent Assoc; 1993; 39(2):36-9. PubMed ID: 8301163
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
