These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

70 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1298788)

  • 1. Histomorphometric comparison of canals prepared by four techniques.
    Baumgartner JC; Martin H; Sabala CL; Strittmatter EJ; Wildey WL; Quigley NC
    J Endod; 1992 Nov; 18(11):530-4. PubMed ID: 1298788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Apical third instrumentation of curved canals with K-type and canal master instruments.
    Shankar P; Parameswaran A; Lakshminarayanan L
    J Endod; 1993 May; 19(5):224-7. PubMed ID: 8360597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of three instruments in the preparation of the curved root canal using the modified double-flared technique.
    Saunders WP; Saunders EM
    J Endod; 1994 Sep; 20(9):440-4. PubMed ID: 7996114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effect of noncutting tipped instruments on the quality of root canal preparation using a modified double-flared technique.
    Saunders WP; Saunders EM
    J Endod; 1992 Jan; 18(1):32-6. PubMed ID: 1402562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The effects of Canal Master, Flex-R, and K-Flex instrumentation on root canal configuration.
    Leseberg DA; Montgomery S
    J Endod; 1991 Feb; 17(2):59-65. PubMed ID: 1919403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A comparison of spreader penetration depth and load required during lateral condensation in teeth prepared using various root canal preparation techniques.
    Dulaimi SF; Wali Al-Hashimi MK
    Int Endod J; 2005 Aug; 38(8):510-5. PubMed ID: 16011768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. An in vivo evaluation of the efficacy of ultrasound after step-back preparation in mandibular molars.
    Archer R; Reader A; Nist R; Beck M; Meyers WJ
    J Endod; 1992 Nov; 18(11):549-52. PubMed ID: 1298792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of two ultrasonic units in shaping simulated curved canals.
    Ahmad M; Pitt Ford TR
    J Endod; 1989 Oct; 15(10):457-62. PubMed ID: 2639937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A novel noninstrumented technique for cleansing the root canal system.
    Lussi A; Nussbächer U; Grosrey J
    J Endod; 1993 Nov; 19(11):549-53. PubMed ID: 8151242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Evaluation of four methods of preparing curved canals].
    Camps J; Levallois B; Dejou J
    Rev Fr Endod; 1990 Mar; 9(1):23-30. PubMed ID: 2382043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [In vitro comparison of root canal preparation with step-back technique and GT rotary file--a nickel-titanium engine driven rotary instrument system].
    Krajczár K; Tóth V; Nyárády Z; Szabó G
    Fogorv Sz; 2005 Jun; 98(3):119-23. PubMed ID: 16108416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The efficacy of step-down procedures during endosonic instrumentation.
    Murgel C; Walmsley AD; Walton RE
    J Endod; 1991 Mar; 17(3):111-5. PubMed ID: 1940723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. An in vivo comparison of the step-back technique versus a step-back/ultrasonic technique in human mandibular molars.
    Haidet J; Reader A; Beck M; Meyers W
    J Endod; 1989 May; 15(5):195-9. PubMed ID: 2607289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. An evaluation of .06 tapered gutta-percha cones for filling of .06 taper prepared curved root canals.
    Gordon MP; Love RM; Chandler NP
    Int Endod J; 2005 Feb; 38(2):87-96. PubMed ID: 15667630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Finite element analysis of the effects of three preparation techniques on stresses within roots having curved canals.
    Cheng R; Zhou XD; Liu Z; Yang H; Gao QH; Hu T
    Int Endod J; 2009 Mar; 42(3):220-6. PubMed ID: 19228212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A comparison in vitro of two ultrasonic root canal preparation techniques.
    Yap SY; Stock CJ
    Int Endod J; 1992 Nov; 25(6):297-303. PubMed ID: 1306862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A radiographic comparison of two root canal instrumentation techniques.
    Backman CA; Oswald RJ; Pitts DL
    J Endod; 1992 Jan; 18(1):19-24. PubMed ID: 1402559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Preparation of curved root canals using hand instruments and mechanical aids].
    Hülsmann M; Bertzbach F
    Dtsch Zahnarztl Z; 1989 Jun; 44(6):448-51. PubMed ID: 2630269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effects of four instrumentation techniques on curved canals: a comparison study.
    Schäfer E
    J Endod; 1996 Dec; 22(12):685-9. PubMed ID: 9220756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Some modifications to the step-back technique in root canal preparation.
    McCabe PS
    J Ir Dent Assoc; 1993; 39(2):36-9. PubMed ID: 8301163
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.