BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1298792)

  • 1. An in vivo evaluation of the efficacy of ultrasound after step-back preparation in mandibular molars.
    Archer R; Reader A; Nist R; Beck M; Meyers WJ
    J Endod; 1992 Nov; 18(11):549-52. PubMed ID: 1298792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. An in vivo comparison of the step-back technique versus a step-back/ultrasonic technique in human mandibular molars.
    Haidet J; Reader A; Beck M; Meyers W
    J Endod; 1989 May; 15(5):195-9. PubMed ID: 2607289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The efficacy of step-down procedures during endosonic instrumentation.
    Murgel C; Walmsley AD; Walton RE
    J Endod; 1991 Mar; 17(3):111-5. PubMed ID: 1940723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [The efficacy of sonic and ultrasonic appliances on root canal debridement].
    Chen CP; Yeh CL; Yang YK; Ma CC; Nieh S
    Zhonghua Ya Yi Xue Hui Za Zhi; 1990 Jun; 9(2):51-60. PubMed ID: 2104285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The in vivo evaluation of hand/rotary/ultrasound instrumentation in necrotic, human mandibular molars.
    Burleson A; Nusstein J; Reader A; Beck M
    J Endod; 2007 Jul; 33(7):782-7. PubMed ID: 17804312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A novel noninstrumented technique for cleansing the root canal system.
    Lussi A; Nussbächer U; Grosrey J
    J Endod; 1993 Nov; 19(11):549-53. PubMed ID: 8151242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Histological evaluation of the effectiveness of five instrumentation techniques for cleaning the apical third of root canals.
    Siqueira JF; Araújo MC; Garcia PF; Fraga RC; Dantas CJ
    J Endod; 1997 Aug; 23(8):499-502. PubMed ID: 9587319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Histological evaluation of ultrasonic debridement comparing sodium hypochlorite and water.
    Walker TL; del Rio CE
    J Endod; 1991 Feb; 17(2):66-71. PubMed ID: 1919404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Canal debridement: effectiveness of sodium hypochlorite and calcium hydroxide as medicaments.
    Yang SF; Rivera EM; Walton RE; Baumgardner KR
    J Endod; 1996 Oct; 22(10):521-5. PubMed ID: 9198438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. An in vitro comparison of the efficacy of the step-back technique versus a step-back/ultrasonic technique in human mandibular molars.
    Goodman A; Reader A; Beck M; Melfi R; Meyers W
    J Endod; 1985 Jun; 11(6):249-56. PubMed ID: 3861764
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The quality of apical canal preparation using hand and rotary instruments with specific criteria for enlargement based on initial apical file size.
    Tan BT; Messer HH
    J Endod; 2002 Sep; 28(9):658-64. PubMed ID: 12236311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effect of noncutting tipped instruments on the quality of root canal preparation using a modified double-flared technique.
    Saunders WP; Saunders EM
    J Endod; 1992 Jan; 18(1):32-6. PubMed ID: 1402562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. In vivo debridement efficacy of ultrasonic irrigation following hand-rotary instrumentation in human mandibular molars.
    Gutarts R; Nusstein J; Reader A; Beck M
    J Endod; 2005 Mar; 31(3):166-70. PubMed ID: 15735461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Ex vivo microscopic assessment of factors affecting the quality of apical seal created by root-end fillings.
    Tobón-Arroyave SI; Restrepo-Pérez MM; Arismendi-Echavarría JA; Velásquez-Restrepo Z; Marín-Botero ML; García-Dorado EC
    Int Endod J; 2007 Aug; 40(8):590-602. PubMed ID: 17511788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Histological evaluation of ultrasonic and sonic instrumentation of curved root canals.
    Walker TL; del Rio CE
    J Endod; 1989 Feb; 15(2):49-59. PubMed ID: 2607269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effect of tip design of nickel-titanium and stainless steel files on root canal preparation.
    Kuhn WG; Carnes DL; Clement DJ; Walker WA
    J Endod; 1997 Dec; 23(12):735-8. PubMed ID: 9487848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Scanning electron microscope observation of canal cleanliness.
    Mandel E; Machtou P; Friedman S
    J Endod; 1990 Jun; 16(6):279-83. PubMed ID: 2074426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Microbial status of apical root canal system of human mandibular first molars with primary apical periodontitis after "one-visit" endodontic treatment.
    Nair PN; Henry S; Cano V; Vera J
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2005 Feb; 99(2):231-52. PubMed ID: 15660098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [In vitro comparison of root canal preparation with step-back technique and GT rotary file--a nickel-titanium engine driven rotary instrument system].
    Krajczár K; Tóth V; Nyárády Z; Szabó G
    Fogorv Sz; 2005 Jun; 98(3):119-23. PubMed ID: 16108416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effects of various irrigating solutions on the cleaning of the root canal with ultrasonic instrumentation.
    Vansan LP; Pécora JD; Costa WF; Maia Campos G
    Braz Dent J; 1990; 1(1):37-44. PubMed ID: 2135876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.