These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
100 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1298802)
1. Effect of precurving endosonic files on the amount of debris and smear layer remaining in curved root canals. Lumley PJ; Walmsley AD; Walton RE; Rippin JW J Endod; 1992 Dec; 18(12):616-9. PubMed ID: 1298802 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effect of precurving on the performance of endosonic K files. Lumley PJ; Walmsley AD J Endod; 1992 May; 18(5):232-6. PubMed ID: 1402578 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Smear layer production of K3 and ProFile Ni-Ti rotary instruments in curved root canals: a comparative SEM study. Kum KY; Kazemi RB; Cha BY; Zhu Q Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2006 Apr; 101(4):536-41. PubMed ID: 16545720 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Cleaning of oval canals using ultrasonic or sonic instrumentation. Lumley PJ; Walmsley AD; Walton RE; Rippin JW J Endod; 1993 Sep; 19(9):453-7. PubMed ID: 8263452 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The efficacy of step-down procedures during endosonic instrumentation. Murgel C; Walmsley AD; Walton RE J Endod; 1991 Mar; 17(3):111-5. PubMed ID: 1940723 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Scanning electron microscopic evaluation of debris and smear layer remaining following use of ProTaper and Hero Shaper instruments in combination with NaOCl and EDTA irrigation. Yang G; Wu H; Zheng Y; Zhang H; Li H; Zhou X Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2008 Oct; 106(4):e63-71. PubMed ID: 18701325 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A comparative study of root canal preparation with NiTi-TEE and K3 rotary Ni-Ti instruments. Jodway B; Hülsmann M Int Endod J; 2006 Jan; 39(1):71-80. PubMed ID: 16409331 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Scanning electron microscopic evaluation of different endodontic procedures on dentin morphology of human teeth. Prati C; Selighini M; Ferrieri P; Mongiorgi R J Endod; 1994 Apr; 20(4):174-9. PubMed ID: 8035157 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Ultrastructural morphologic evaluation of root canal walls prepared by two rotary nickel-titanium systems: a comparative study. Sabet NE; Lutfy RA Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2008 Sep; 106(3):e59-66. PubMed ID: 18602300 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparative investigation of two rotary nickel-titanium instruments: ProTaper versus RaCe. Part 2. Cleaning effectiveness and shaping ability in severely curved root canals of extracted teeth. Schäfer E; Vlassis M Int Endod J; 2004 Apr; 37(4):239-48. PubMed ID: 15056350 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The effect of high-frequency electrical pulses on organic tissue in root canals. Lendini M; Alemanno E; Migliaretti G; Berutti E Int Endod J; 2005 Aug; 38(8):531-8. PubMed ID: 16011771 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effectiveness in cleaning oval-shaped root canals using Anatomic Endodontic Technology, ProFile and manual instrumentation: a scanning electron microscopic study. Zmener O; Pameijer CH; Banegas G Int Endod J; 2005 Jun; 38(6):356-63. PubMed ID: 15910470 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Efficacy of the NaviTip FX irrigation needle in removing post instrumentation canal smear layer and debris in curved root canals. Zmener O; Pameijer CH; Serrano SA; Palo RM; Iglesias EF J Endod; 2009 Sep; 35(9):1270-3. PubMed ID: 19720229 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The effect of application time of EDTA and NaOCl on intracanal smear layer removal: an SEM analysis. Teixeira CS; Felippe MC; Felippe WT Int Endod J; 2005 May; 38(5):285-90. PubMed ID: 15876291 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effects of irrigation on debris and smear layer on canal walls prepared by two rotary techniques: a scanning electron microscopic study. Peters OA; Barbakow F J Endod; 2000 Jan; 26(1):6-10. PubMed ID: 11194369 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A comparative scanning electron microscopic investigation of the efficacy of manual and automated instrumentation of root canals. Schäfer E; Zapke K J Endod; 2000 Nov; 26(11):660-4. PubMed ID: 11469296 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Efficacy of Er:YAG laser irradiation in removing debris and smear layer on root canal walls. Takeda FH; Harashima T; Kimura Y; Matsumoto K J Endod; 1998 Aug; 24(8):548-51. PubMed ID: 9759018 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A scanning electron microscopic evaluation of the effectiveness of the F-file versus ultrasonic activation of a K-file to remove smear layer. Chopra S; Murray PE; Namerow KN J Endod; 2008 Oct; 34(10):1243-5. PubMed ID: 18793930 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Determination of the minimum instrumentation size for penetration of irrigants to the apical third of root canal systems. Khademi A; Yazdizadeh M; Feizianfard M J Endod; 2006 May; 32(5):417-20. PubMed ID: 16631839 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Apical third instrumentation of curved canals with K-type and canal master instruments. Shankar P; Parameswaran A; Lakshminarayanan L J Endod; 1993 May; 19(5):224-7. PubMed ID: 8360597 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]