These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
9. Bond strength and clinical evaluation of a new dentinal bonding agent to amalgam and resin composite. Olmez A; Ulusu T Quintessence Int; 1995 Nov; 26(11):785-93. PubMed ID: 8628838 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A practice-based, randomized, controlled clinical trial of a new resin composite restorative: one-year results. Wilson MA; Cowan AJ; Randall RC; Crisp RJ; Wilson NH Oper Dent; 2002; 27(5):423-9. PubMed ID: 12216558 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Restoration deterioration related to later failure. Smales RJ; Webster DA Oper Dent; 1993; 18(4):130-7. PubMed ID: 8152980 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Cariostatic and ultraconservative sealed restorations: six-year results. Mertz-Fairhurst EJ; Smith CD; Williams JE; Sherrer JD; Mackert JR; Richards EE; Schuster GS; O'Dell NL; Pierce KL; Kovarik RE Quintessence Int; 1992 Dec; 23(12):827-38. PubMed ID: 1305301 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Ten-year clinical assessment of three posterior resin composites and two amalgams. Mair LH Quintessence Int; 1998 Aug; 29(8):483-90. PubMed ID: 9807127 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Four-year clinical evaluation of a self-etching primer and resin-based restorative material. Gordan VV; Shen C; Watson RE; Mjor IA Am J Dent; 2005 Feb; 18(1):45-9. PubMed ID: 15810481 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Influence of the isolation method on the 10-year clinical behaviour of posterior resin composite restorations. Raskin A; Setcos JC; Vreven J; Wilson NH Clin Oral Investig; 2000 Sep; 4(3):148-52. PubMed ID: 11000319 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A comparison of the marginal and internal adaptation of amalgam and resin composite restorations in small to moderate-sized Class II preparations of conventional design. Duncalf WV; Wilson NH Quintessence Int; 2000 May; 31(5):347-52. PubMed ID: 11203946 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Review of bonded amalgam restorations, and assessment in a general practice over five years. Smales RJ; Wetherell JD Oper Dent; 2000; 25(5):374-81. PubMed ID: 11203845 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Class II glass ionomer cermet tunnel, resin sandwich and amalgam restorations over 2 years. Wilkie R; Lidums A; Smales R Am J Dent; 1993 Aug; 6(4):181-4. PubMed ID: 7803004 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effects of two methods of moisture control on marginal microleakage between resin composite and etched enamel: a clinical study. Knight GT; Berry TG; Barghi N; Burns TR Int J Prosthodont; 1993; 6(5):475-9. PubMed ID: 8297458 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Attitudes and use of rubber dam by Irish general dental practitioners. Lynch CD; McConnell RJ Int Endod J; 2007 Jun; 40(6):427-32. PubMed ID: 17501755 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]