These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

112 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1299642)

  • 21. Fit of implant-supported fixed prostheses fabricated on master casts made from a dental stone and a dental plaster.
    Wise M
    J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Nov; 86(5):532-8. PubMed ID: 11725282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Evaluation of splinting implant impression techniques: two dimensional analyses.
    Tarib NA; Seong TW; Chuen KM; Kun MS; Ahmad M; Kamarudin KH
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2012 Mar; 20(1):35-9. PubMed ID: 22474935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Accuracy of open tray implant impressions: an in vitro comparison of stock versus custom trays.
    Burns J; Palmer R; Howe L; Wilson R
    J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Mar; 89(3):250-5. PubMed ID: 12644799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Accuracy of definitive casts using 4 implant-level impression techniques in a scenario of multi-implant system with different implant angulations and subgingival alignment levels.
    Martínez-Rus F; García C; Santamaría A; Özcan M; Pradíes G
    Implant Dent; 2013 Jun; 22(3):268-76. PubMed ID: 23615660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Accuracy of implant impression techniques.
    Assif D; Marshak B; Schmidt A
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1996; 11(2):216-22. PubMed ID: 8666454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Dimensional accuracy of resultant casts made by a monophase, one-step and two-step, and a novel two-step putty/light-body impression technique: an in vitro study.
    Caputi S; Varvara G
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Apr; 99(4):274-81. PubMed ID: 18395537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Effect of water temperature on the accuracy of stone casts recovered from addition-reaction elastomeric impression materials.
    Saunders WP; Sharkey SW; Smith GM
    Int J Prosthodont; 1990; 3(6):577-81. PubMed ID: 2083027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Accuracy of impression techniques for implants. Part 1--Influence of transfer copings surface abrasion.
    Assunção WG; Cardoso A; Gomes EA; Tabata LF; dos Santos PH
    J Prosthodont; 2008 Dec; 17(8):641-7. PubMed ID: 19090889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. An evaluation of three implant level impression techniques for single tooth implant.
    Daoudi MF; Setchell DJ; Searson LJ
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2004 Mar; 12(1):9-14. PubMed ID: 15058176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Comparative analysis of 4 impression techniques for implants.
    Cabral LM; Guedes CG
    Implant Dent; 2007 Jun; 16(2):187-94. PubMed ID: 17563509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Dimensional accuracy of dental casts: influence of tray material, impression material, and time.
    Thongthammachat S; Moore BK; Barco MT; Hovijitra S; Brown DT; Andres CJ
    J Prosthodont; 2002 Jun; 11(2):98-108. PubMed ID: 12087547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Cement fixation and screw retention: parameters of passive fit. An in vitro study of three-unit implant-supported fixed partial dentures.
    Heckmann SM; Karl M; Wichmann MG; Winter W; Graef F; Taylor TD
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2004 Aug; 15(4):466-73. PubMed ID: 15248882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. A clinical comparison of two vinyl polysiloxane impression materials using the one-step technique.
    Raigrodski AJ; Dogan S; Mancl LA; Heindl H
    J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Sep; 102(3):179-86. PubMed ID: 19703625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Evaluation of the implant master cast by means of the Periotest method.
    May KB; Curtis A; Wang RF
    Implant Dent; 1999; 8(2):133-40. PubMed ID: 10635155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. In vitro comparison of master cast accuracy for single-tooth implant replacement.
    Vigolo P; Majzoub Z; Cordioli G
    J Prosthet Dent; 2000 May; 83(5):562-6. PubMed ID: 10793389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. A laboratory investigation of the accuracy of two impression techniques for single-tooth implants.
    Daoudi MF; Setchell DJ; Searson LJ
    Int J Prosthodont; 2001; 14(2):152-8. PubMed ID: 11843452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Comparative accuracy of implant impression procedures.
    Assif D; Fenton A; Zarb G; Schmitt A
    Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 1992; 12(2):112-21. PubMed ID: 1521993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The dimensional accuracy of four impression techniques with the use of addition silicone impression materials.
    Al-Bakri IA; Hussey D; Al-Omari WM
    J Clin Dent; 2007; 18(2):29-33. PubMed ID: 17508620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The suitability of head-of-implant and conventional abutment impression techniques for implant-retained three unit bridges: an in vitro study.
    Bartlett DW; Greenwood R; Howe L
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2002 Dec; 10(4):163-6. PubMed ID: 12526273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Prefabricated acrylic resin bars for splinting implant transfer copings.
    Dumbrigue HB; Gurun DC; Javid NS
    J Prosthet Dent; 2000 Jul; 84(1):108-10. PubMed ID: 10898848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.