These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

118 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1300210)

  • 1. Alternative approaches to the analysis of binary and categorical repeated measurements.
    Kenward MG; Jones B
    J Biopharm Stat; 1992; 2(2):137-70. PubMed ID: 1300210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A comparison of group sequential methods for binary longitudinal data.
    Spiessens B; Lesaffre E; Verbeke G
    Stat Med; 2003 Feb; 22(4):501-15. PubMed ID: 12590410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The analysis of longitudinal polytomous data: generalized estimating equations and connections with weighted least squares.
    Miller ME; Davis CS; Landis JR
    Biometrics; 1993 Dec; 49(4):1033-44. PubMed ID: 8117899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Two new covariate adjustment methods for non-inferiority assessment of binary clinical trials data.
    Hou Y; Ding V; Li K; Zhou XH
    J Biopharm Stat; 2011 Jan; 21(1):77-93. PubMed ID: 21191856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. MMRM versus MI in dealing with missing data--a comparison based on 25 NDA data sets.
    Siddiqui O
    J Biopharm Stat; 2011 May; 21(3):423-36. PubMed ID: 21442517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Multilevel analysis of group-randomized trials with binary outcomes.
    Kim HY; Preisser JS; Rozier RG; Valiyaparambil JV
    Community Dent Oral Epidemiol; 2006 Aug; 34(4):241-51. PubMed ID: 16856945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Optimal design for dose response using beta distributed responses.
    Wu Y; Fedorov VV; Propert KJ
    J Biopharm Stat; 2005; 15(5):753-71. PubMed ID: 16078383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Population-averaged and cluster-specific models for clustered ordinal response data.
    Ten Have TR; Landis JR; Hartzel J
    Stat Med; 1996 Dec; 15(23):2573-88. PubMed ID: 8961464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. On tests of equivalence via non-unity relative risk for matched-pair design.
    Tang NS; Tang ML; Chan IS
    Stat Med; 2003 Apr; 22(8):1217-33. PubMed ID: 12687652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Estimating treatment effects in clinical crossover trials.
    Grieve A; Senn S
    J Biopharm Stat; 1998 May; 8(2):191-233; discussion 235-47. PubMed ID: 9598420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Marginal analysis of incomplete longitudinal binary data: a cautionary note on LOCF imputation.
    Cook RJ; Zeng L; Yi GY
    Biometrics; 2004 Sep; 60(3):820-8. PubMed ID: 15339307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Marginal modeling of binary cross-over data.
    Becker MP; Balagtas CC
    Biometrics; 1993 Dec; 49(4):997-1009. PubMed ID: 8117910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Issues in use of SAS PROC.MIXED to test the significance of treatment effects in controlled clinical trials.
    Ahn C; Tonidandel S; Overall JE
    J Biopharm Stat; 2000 May; 10(2):265-86. PubMed ID: 10803729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Analysis of trichotomous pharmaceutical endpoints.
    Berger VW; Durkalski VL
    J Biopharm Stat; 2005; 15(4):739-45. PubMed ID: 16022176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A note on the use of unbiased estimating equations to estimate correlation in analysis of longitudinal trials.
    Sun W; Shults J; Leonard M
    Biom J; 2009 Feb; 51(1):5-18. PubMed ID: 19197953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. An alternative approach to assess exchangeability of a test treatment and the standard treatment with normally distributed response.
    Tsong Y; Shen M
    J Biopharm Stat; 2007; 17(2):329-38. PubMed ID: 17365227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Methods for the statistical analysis of binary data in split-mouth designs with baseline measurements.
    Donner A; Zou GY
    Stat Med; 2007 Aug; 26(18):3476-86. PubMed ID: 17149800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Detecting and adjusting for small-study effects in meta-analysis.
    Rücker G; Carpenter JR; Schwarzer G
    Biom J; 2011 Mar; 53(2):351-68. PubMed ID: 21374698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Analysis of longitudinal binary data with missing data due to dropouts.
    Ali MW; Talukder E
    J Biopharm Stat; 2005; 15(6):993-1007. PubMed ID: 16279357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A generalized estimating equation approach for modeling random length binary vector data.
    Albert PS; Follmann DA; Barnhart HX
    Biometrics; 1997 Sep; 53(3):1116-24. PubMed ID: 9290230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.