These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1300213)

  • 1. Directional baseline differences and type I error probabilities in randomized clinical trials.
    Overall JE; Magee KN
    J Biopharm Stat; 1992; 2(2):189-203. PubMed ID: 1300213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Baseline correction in a two-way randomized blocks design.
    Overall JE; Magee KN
    J Biopharm Stat; 1992; 2(2):205-17. PubMed ID: 1300214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Implications of chance baseline differences in repeated measurement designs.
    Overall JE; Doyle SR
    J Biopharm Stat; 1994 Jul; 4(2):199-216. PubMed ID: 7951275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Drop-outs and a random regression model.
    Overall JE
    J Biopharm Stat; 1997 Jul; 7(3):383-402. PubMed ID: 9252832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Baseline adjustments for binary data in repeated cross-sectional cluster randomized trials.
    Nixon RM; Thompson SG
    Stat Med; 2003 Sep; 22(17):2673-92. PubMed ID: 12939779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Improving the estimation of change from baseline in a continuous outcome measure in the clinical trial setting.
    Mayer-Hamblett N; Kronmal RA
    Contemp Clin Trials; 2005 Feb; 26(1):2-16. PubMed ID: 15837448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Permutation test following covariate-adaptive randomization in randomized controlled trials.
    Hasegawa T; Tango T
    J Biopharm Stat; 2009; 19(1):106-19. PubMed ID: 19127470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Robustness and power of analysis of covariance applied to ordinal scaled data as arising in randomized controlled trials.
    Sullivan LM; D'Agostino RB
    Stat Med; 2003 Apr; 22(8):1317-34. PubMed ID: 12687657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Nonparametric analysis of covariance for comparing change in randomized studies with baseline values subject to error.
    Knoke JD
    Biometrics; 1991 Jun; 47(2):523-33. PubMed ID: 1912259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Baseline corrections in experimental and quasi-experimental clinical trials.
    Overall JE; Ashby B
    Neuropsychopharmacology; 1991 Jun; 4(4):273-81. PubMed ID: 1867736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Parametric versus non-parametric statistics in the analysis of randomized trials with non-normally distributed data.
    Vickers AJ
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2005 Nov; 5():35. PubMed ID: 16269081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Use of the average baseline versus the time-matched baseline in parallel group thorough QT/QTc studies.
    Meng Z; Quan H; Fan L; Kringle R; Sun G
    J Biopharm Stat; 2010 May; 20(3):665-82. PubMed ID: 20358444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Should baseline be a covariate or dependent variable in analyses of change from baseline in clinical trials?
    Liu GF; Lu K; Mogg R; Mallick M; Mehrotra DV
    Stat Med; 2009 Sep; 28(20):2509-30. PubMed ID: 19610129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. On efficiency of constrained longitudinal data analysis versus longitudinal analysis of covariance.
    Lu K
    Biometrics; 2010 Sep; 66(3):891-6. PubMed ID: 19764951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Power comparison of robust approximate and non-parametric tests for the analysis of cross-over trials.
    Correa JA; Bellavance F
    Stat Med; 2001 Apr; 20(8):1185-96. PubMed ID: 11304735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Revisiting the level of evidence in randomized controlled clinical trials: A simulation approach.
    Bajard A; Chabaud S; Pérol D; Boissel JP; Nony P
    Contemp Clin Trials; 2009 Sep; 30(5):400-10. PubMed ID: 19576298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Adjusting for observable selection bias in block randomized trials.
    Ivanova A; Barrier RC; Berger VW
    Stat Med; 2005 May; 24(10):1537-46. PubMed ID: 15723426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of multinomial and binomial proportion methods for analysis of multinomial count data.
    Galyean ML; Wester DB
    J Anim Sci; 2010 Oct; 88(10):3452-63. PubMed ID: 20601524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A note on variance estimation in random effects meta-regression.
    Sidik K; Jonkman JN
    J Biopharm Stat; 2005; 15(5):823-38. PubMed ID: 16078388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Tests for the analysis of variance of crossover designs with correlated errors.
    Bellavance F; Tardif S; Stephens MA
    Biometrics; 1996 Jun; 52(2):607-12. PubMed ID: 8672705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.