These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

215 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1300218)

  • 21. Validity and reliability of the revised Neuropsychological Impairment Scale (NIS).
    O'Donnell WE; De Soto CB; De Soto JL
    J Clin Psychol; 1993 May; 49(3):372-82. PubMed ID: 8315040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Investigation of the single case in neuropsychology: confidence limits on the abnormality of test scores and test score differences.
    Crawford JR; Garthwaite PH
    Neuropsychologia; 2002; 40(8):1196-208. PubMed ID: 11931923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Performance measures of alcohol-induced impairment: towards a practical ignition-interlock system for motor vehicles.
    Matsumura K; Yamakoshi T; Ida T
    Percept Mot Skills; 2009 Dec; 109(3):841-50. PubMed ID: 20178284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The association of memory complaint with computer-simulated everyday memory performance.
    Larrabee GJ; West RL; Crook TH
    J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 1991 Jul; 13(4):466-78. PubMed ID: 1918280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Construct validity of neuropsychological tests of conceptual and attentional abilities.
    O'Donnell JP; Macgregor LA; Dabrowski JJ; Oestreicher JM; Romero JJ
    J Clin Psychol; 1994 Jul; 50(4):596-600. PubMed ID: 7983209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. [Comment on the letter by M. Gress-Heister regarding the contribution by H. Wolfram and J. Pausch. On the value of the brief psychological performance test for detection of acquired impairments. Exemplified by the Lehrl and Fischer c. I. Test].
    Wolfram H
    Nervenarzt; 1995 Jun; 66(6):479. PubMed ID: 7637836
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Emotional variables and neuropsychological test performance.
    Gass CS
    J Clin Psychol; 1991 Jan; 47(1):100-4. PubMed ID: 2026762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Luria left in the lurch: unfulfilled promises are not valid tests.
    Adams KM
    J Clin Neuropsychol; 1984 Nov; 6(4):455-8. PubMed ID: 6501583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Forensic neuropsychology: the art of practicing a science that does not yet exist.
    Faust D
    Neuropsychol Rev; 1991 Sep; 2(3):205-31. PubMed ID: 1844709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Behavior rating inventory of executive function.
    Baron IS
    Child Neuropsychol; 2000 Sep; 6(3):235-8. PubMed ID: 11419452
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Tactual performance test trials: internal consistency reliability using the Gilmer-Feldt coefficient.
    Charter RA
    Percept Mot Skills; 2001 Oct; 93(2):363-6. PubMed ID: 11769891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Computerized neuropsychological assessment devices: joint position paper of the American Academy of Clinical Neuropsychology and the National Academy of Neuropsychology.
    Bauer RM; Iverson GL; Cernich AN; Binder LM; Ruff RM; Naugle RI
    Arch Clin Neuropsychol; 2012 May; 27(3):362-73. PubMed ID: 22382386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Computerized neuropsychological testing in epilepsy: overview of available tools.
    Witt JA; Alpherts W; Helmstaedter C
    Seizure; 2013 Jul; 22(6):416-23. PubMed ID: 23628168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Development and quality assurance of computer-based assessment batteries.
    Schlegel RE; Gilliland K
    Arch Clin Neuropsychol; 2007 Feb; 22 Suppl 1():S49-61. PubMed ID: 17085010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. [The diagnostic value of computer-assisted psychometric procedures].
    Krause A; Regel H; Weber P
    Psychiatr Neurol Med Psychol (Leipz); 1988 Sep; 40(9):537-41. PubMed ID: 3237882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Validity and utility of computer-based test interpretation.
    Butcher JN; Perry JN; Atlis MM
    Psychol Assess; 2000 Mar; 12(1):6-18. PubMed ID: 10752359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Neuropsychological assessment and the Disability Rating Scale (DRS): a concurrent validity study.
    Neese LE; Caroselli JS; Klaas P; High WM; Becker LJ; Scheibel RS
    Brain Inj; 2000 Aug; 14(8):719-24. PubMed ID: 10969890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The high sensitivity cognitive screen.
    Fogel BS
    Int Psychogeriatr; 1991; 3(2):273-88. PubMed ID: 1811779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. [Standardized analysis of visuospatial perception. Studies of objectivity, reliability and validity].
    Kerkhoff G; Genzel S; Marquardt C
    Nervenarzt; 1994 Oct; 65(10):689-95. PubMed ID: 7808567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Development and clinical trial of virtual reality-based cognitive assessment in people with stroke: preliminary study.
    Kang YJ; Ku J; Han K; Kim SI; Yu TW; Lee JH; Park CI
    Cyberpsychol Behav; 2008 Jun; 11(3):329-39. PubMed ID: 18537503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.