These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
156 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1300517)
1. Twelve-month success rates with a hydrogel diffractive bifocal contact lens. Back A; Grant T; Hine N; Holden BA Optom Vis Sci; 1992 Dec; 69(12):941-7. PubMed ID: 1300517 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Interest of presbyopes in contact lens correction and their success with monovision. Gauthier CA; Holden BA; Grant T; Chong MS Optom Vis Sci; 1992 Nov; 69(11):858-62. PubMed ID: 1454302 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Adverse events and discontinuations during 18 months of silicone hydrogel contact lens wear. Santodomingo-Rubido J; Wolffsohn JS; Gilmartin B Eye Contact Lens; 2007 Nov; 33(6 Pt 1):288-92. PubMed ID: 17993823 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A multi-centre study of lapsed contact lens wearers. Young G; Veys J; Pritchard N; Coleman S Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2002 Nov; 22(6):516-27. PubMed ID: 12477016 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Investigation of the performance of the Menifocal Z gas-permeable bifocal contact lens during continuous wear. Lakkis C; Goldenberg SA; Woods CA Optom Vis Sci; 2005 Dec; 82(12):1022-9. PubMed ID: 16357643 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Bifocal hydrogel lenses: an overview. Josephson JE; Caffery B J Am Optom Assoc; 1986 Mar; 57(3):190-5. PubMed ID: 3958417 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A Survey of Presbyopic Contact Lens Wearers in a University Setting. Rueff EM; Varghese RJ; Brack TM; Downard DE; Bailey MD Optom Vis Sci; 2016 Aug; 93(8):848-54. PubMed ID: 27232896 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Clinical evaluation of fitting presbyopic patients with contact lenses. Kuhl SA; Henry VA; Bennett ES J Am Optom Assoc; 1992 Mar; 63(3):182-6. PubMed ID: 1583278 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Comparison of high-order optical aberrations induced by different multifocal contact lens geometries]. Peyre C; Fumery L; Gatinel D J Fr Ophtalmol; 2005 Jun; 28(6):599-604. PubMed ID: 16141922 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Patient response to concentric bifocal contact lenses. Harris MG; Sheedy JE; Bronge MR; Joe SM; Mook MA J Am Optom Assoc; 1991 May; 62(5):389-93. PubMed ID: 1813535 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Predicting and assessing visual performance with multizone bifocal contact lenses. Martin JA; Roorda A Optom Vis Sci; 2003 Dec; 80(12):812-9. PubMed ID: 14688544 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A 1-year prospective clinical trial of balafilcon a (PureVision) silicone-hydrogel contact lenses used on a 30-day continuous wear schedule. Brennan NA; Coles ML; Comstock TL; Levy B Ophthalmology; 2002 Jun; 109(6):1172-7. PubMed ID: 12045062 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The Tangent Streak rigid gas permeable bifocal contact lens. Remba MJ J Am Optom Assoc; 1988 Mar; 59(3):212-6. PubMed ID: 3351189 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Predicting success with silicone-hydrogel contact lenses in new wearers. Best N; Drury L; Wolffsohn JS Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2013 Oct; 36(5):232-7. PubMed ID: 23522993 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Clinical evaluation of fitting toric soft contact lenses to current non-users. Sulley A; Young G; Lorenz KO; Hunt C Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2013 Mar; 33(2):94-103. PubMed ID: 23406489 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]