These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

87 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1301761)

  • 1. [Experimental study of extracochlear electric stimulation].
    Ni DF
    Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Ke Za Zhi; 1992; 27(5):261-4, 318. PubMed ID: 1301761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Cochlear histopathological changes following chronic extracochlear electrical stimulation in kittens].
    Ni D
    Zhongguo Yi Xue Ke Xue Yuan Xue Bao; 1993 Aug; 15(4):261-5. PubMed ID: 8168205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Impulse patterns of auditory nerve fibres to extra- and intracochlear electrical stimulation.
    Hartmann R; Klinke R
    Acta Otolaryngol Suppl; 1990; 469():128-34. PubMed ID: 2162619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Establishment and rudimentary application of the method of recording auditory brainstem responses electrically stimulated via round-window niche in cochlear implants].
    Cheng JN; Cao KL; Wei CG; Yang LJ; Luan L; Li H; Li Y; Zhang QH
    Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2008 Sep; 43(9):653-9. PubMed ID: 19035257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [A physiological investigation of chronic electrical stimulation with scala tympani electrodes in kittens].
    Ni D
    Zhongguo Yi Xue Ke Xue Yuan Xue Bao; 1992 Dec; 14(6):402-7. PubMed ID: 1303812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Extracochlear Stimulation of Electrically Evoked Auditory Brainstem Responses (eABRs) Remains the Preferred Pre-implant Auditory Nerve Function Test in an Assessor-blinded Comparison.
    Causon A; O'Driscoll M; Stapleton E; Lloyd S; Freeman S; Munro KJ
    Otol Neurotol; 2019 Jan; 40(1):47-55. PubMed ID: 30489452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Intraoperative test of auditory nerve function.
    Frohne C; Lesinski A; Battmer RD; Lenarz T
    Am J Otol; 1997 Nov; 18(6 Suppl):S93-4. PubMed ID: 9391614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Intracochlear and extracochlear ECAPs suggest antidromic action potentials.
    Miller CA; Abbas PJ; Hay-McCutcheon MJ; Robinson BK; Nourski KV; Jeng FC
    Hear Res; 2004 Dec; 198(1-2):75-86. PubMed ID: 15567605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Results of the round window electrical stimulation in 460 cases of total deafness.
    Meyer B; Drira M; Gegu D; Chouard CH
    Acta Otolaryngol Suppl; 1984; 411():168-76. PubMed ID: 6596841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Results and perspectives with extracochlear round window electrodes.
    Dillier N; Spillmann T
    Acta Otolaryngol Suppl; 1984; 411():221-9. PubMed ID: 6596846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Monitoring the electrode position during acoustic neuroma surgery.
    Frohne C; Lesinski A; Battmer RD; Lenarz T
    Am J Otol; 1997 Nov; 18(6 Suppl):S95-6. PubMed ID: 9391615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Results and therapeutic indications of the electrical stimulation of the round window in 581 cases of bilateral total deafness].
    Chabolle F; Garabedian N; Meyer B; Chouard CH
    Ann Otolaryngol Chir Cervicofac; 1988; 105(4):237-41. PubMed ID: 3408094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Electrically induced potentiation of eighth nerve responses.
    Ball LL
    J Aud Res; 1982 Apr; 22(2):107-30. PubMed ID: 7187432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Pre-operative cochlear implant assessment using a round window ball electrode.
    Ryan RM
    J Laryngol Otol Suppl; 1989; 18():11-3. PubMed ID: 2607189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Intraoperative electrically evoked stapedius reflex thresholds in children undergone cochlear implantation: round window and cochleostomy approaches.
    Karatas E; Aud MD; Baglam T; Durucu C; Baysal E; Kanlikama M
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2011 Sep; 75(9):1123-6. PubMed ID: 21737149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Electrocochleography in profoundly deaf children: comparison of promontory and round window techniques.
    Aso S; Gibson WP
    Am J Otol; 1994 May; 15(3):376-9. PubMed ID: 8579143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The retrosigmoid approach for auditory brainstem implantation.
    Colletti V; Fiorino FG; Carner M; Giarbini N; Sacchetto L; Cumer G
    Am J Otol; 2000 Nov; 21(6):826-36. PubMed ID: 11078071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Incidence and characteristics of facial nerve stimulation in children with cochlear implants.
    Cushing SL; Papsin BC; Gordon KA
    Laryngoscope; 2006 Oct; 116(10):1787-91. PubMed ID: 17003731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Electrically evoked auditory brainstem response monitoring of auditory brainstem implant integrity during facial nerve tumor surgery.
    Waring MD
    Laryngoscope; 1992 Nov; 102(11):1293-5. PubMed ID: 1405993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Electrical responses recorded from the round window of the cat cochlea].
    Bakaĭ EA; Chaĭka SP
    Neirofiziologiia; 1979; 11(2):151-7. PubMed ID: 440488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.