200 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1302384)
1. Influence of intraperitoneal drainage after cholecystectomy; a prospective ultrasonographic study.
Kriplani AK; Sawhney S; Kumar S; Kapur BM
Trop Gastroenterol; 1992; 13(4):146-51. PubMed ID: 1302384
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Role of intraperitoneal drains on subhepatic collection following routine uncomplicated cholecystectomy.
Peer GQ; Wani NA
J Indian Med Assoc; 1993 Jul; 91(7):175-6. PubMed ID: 8263331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Influence of intraperitoneal drains on subhepatic collections following cholecystectomy: a prospective clinical trial.
Monson JR; MacFie J; Irving H; Keane FB; Brennan TG; Tanner WA
Br J Surg; 1986 Dec; 73(12):993-4. PubMed ID: 3539256
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Half versus full vacuum suction drainage after modified radical mastectomy for breast cancer- a prospective randomized clinical trial[ISRCTN24484328].
Chintamani ; Singhal V; Singh J; Bansal A; Saxena S
BMC Cancer; 2005 Jan; 5():11. PubMed ID: 15676064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Drainage after cholecystectomy. A prospective randomized clinical trial.
al-Arfaj AL; Shahab K; al-Ghassab G; al-Breiki H; al-Shawan S; Azab A
Int Surg; 1992; 77(4):274-6. PubMed ID: 1478809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Non-inferiority of open passive drains compared with closed suction drains in pancreatic surgery outcomes: A prospective observational study.
Marchegiani G; Perri G; Pulvirenti A; Sereni E; Azzini AM; Malleo G; Salvia R; Bassi C
Surgery; 2018 Sep; 164(3):443-449. PubMed ID: 29903511
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Cholecystectomy is safer without drainage: the results of a prospective, randomized clinical trial.
Monson JR; Guillou PJ; Keane FB; Tanner WA; Brennan TG
Surgery; 1991 Jun; 109(6):740-6. PubMed ID: 2042093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Cholecystectomy: safe or not safe to drain?
Mellor SG; Thomas MH; Donnellan BS
J R Soc Med; 1988 Oct; 81(10):566-8. PubMed ID: 3184087
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Abdominal drainage following cholecystectomy: high, low, or no suction?
McCormack TT; Abel PD; Collins CD
Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 1983 Sep; 65(5):326-8. PubMed ID: 6614773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A randomised comparison of three drainage systems following cholecystectomy.
Loder PB; Smith GH; Morris S; Bambach CP; Smith RC
Aust N Z J Surg; 1987 Aug; 57(8):531-5. PubMed ID: 3675403
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Cholecystectomy and drainage: ultrasonographic and radioisotopic evaluation.
Kapoor VK; Ibrarullah M; Baijal SS; Kulshreshtha A; Mittal BR; Saxena R; Das BK; Kaushik SP
World J Surg; 1993; 17(1):101-4. PubMed ID: 8447130
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Passive tube and suction drainage after elective cholecystectomy--a comparison using ultrasonography.
Brewster NT; King PM; Cunningham C; Adam RD; Griffiths JM
J R Coll Surg Edinb; 1992 Oct; 37(5):325-7. PubMed ID: 1479562
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Randomized trial of drainage after cholecystectomy. Suction vaersus static drainage through a main wound versus a stab incision.
van der Linden W; Gedda S; Edlund G
Am J Surg; 1981 Feb; 141(2):289-94. PubMed ID: 7006427
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A randomised prospective trial of two drainage methods after cholecystectomy.
Fraser I; Everson NW; Nash JR
Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 1982 May; 64(3):183-5. PubMed ID: 7081917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Is closed-suction drain necessary in unicompartmental knee replacement? A prospective randomised study.
Confalonieri N; Manzotti A; Pullen C
Knee; 2004 Oct; 11(5):399-402. PubMed ID: 15351417
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Results of a randomized controlled trial comparing closed-suction drains versus passive gravity drains after pancreatic resection.
Čečka F; Jon B; Skalický P; Čermáková E; Neoral Č; Loveček M
Surgery; 2018 Nov; 164(5):1057-1063. PubMed ID: 30082139
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Is the routine use of drainage after elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy justified? A randomized trial.
Georgiou C; Demetriou N; Pallaris T; Theodosopoulos T; Katsouyanni K; Polymeneas G
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2011 Mar; 21(2):119-23. PubMed ID: 21247302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Closed-suction versus Penrose drainage after cholecystectomy. A prospective, randomized evaluation.
Sarr MG; Parikh KJ; Minken SL; Zuidema GD; Cameron JL
Am J Surg; 1987 Apr; 153(4):394-8. PubMed ID: 3551645
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A comparison of two types of vacuum drainage after cholecystectomy.
Salam IM; McMullin JP; O'Higgins NJ
Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 1984 May; 66(3):190-1. PubMed ID: 6721407
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Cholecystectomy with and without drainage: a prospective randomised study.
Saad AM; el Hassan AM
East Afr Med J; 1993 Aug; 70(8):499-501. PubMed ID: 8261970
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
