These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

171 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1302862)

  • 1. Is R.N. practice of medicine negligence per se? Case in point: Turek v. Elizabeth Com. Health Ctr (488 N.W. 2d 567--NE [1992]).
    Tammelleo AD
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1992 Nov; 33(6):2. PubMed ID: 1302862
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Nurse fails to chart call to doctor. Case in point: Morse v. Flint River Comm. Hosp. 450 S.E.2d 253--GA (1994).
    Tammelleo AD
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1995 Jan; 35(8):2. PubMed ID: 7886195
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Nursing negligence not "superceding" cause of death. Case in point: Dent v. Perkins 629 So. 2d 1354--LA (1993).
    Tammelleo AD
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1994 Apr; 34(11):4. PubMed ID: 8184094
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Georgia Supreme Court affirmed 'gross negligence' standard Case on point: Gliemmo v. Cousineau, SO9A1807 (3/15/2010) So.2d-GA.
    Nurs Law Regan Rep; 2010 Mar; 50(10):4. PubMed ID: 20499621
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Is your patient complaining of "pain" or "burning"? Case in point: McLain v. Glenwood Reg. Medical Center (601 S.E. 2d 240--LA [1992]).
    Tammelleo AD
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1992 Oct; 33(5):4. PubMed ID: 1454995
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Surgeon attempts to blame nurses for sponge left in mastectomy patient. Case on point: Mitchell v. Baylor Univ. Med. Ctr., 2003 WL 21508493 S.W.3d-TX.
    Nurs Law Regan Rep; 2003 Aug; 44(3):2. PubMed ID: 14508919
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. May you delay implementing Dr.'s orders? Case in point: Koeniguer v. Eckrich (422 N.W. 2d 600--SD (1988)).
    Tammelleo AD
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1988 Jul; 29(2):2. PubMed ID: 3406422
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. NY: nurse learns of pt's doubt re surgery site: hospital liabile for operation on wrong hand.
    Nurs Law Regan Rep; 2003 Dec; 44(7):3. PubMed ID: 14730829
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Can physicians testify as to "nursing negligence"?
    Tammelleo AD
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1994 Oct; 35(5):1. PubMed ID: 7816923
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Physicians retract opinion: nurses not negligent. Case in point: Galloway v. Baton Rouge General Hosp. (583 So. 2d 1169--LA (1991)).
    Tammelleo AD
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1991 Nov; 32(6):4. PubMed ID: 1763180
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Allocation of fault required in 'comparative negligence' cases. Haley v. Brown, No. 93, 148 (Kan. App. 08/25/2006) P.2d -KS.
    Nurs Law Regan Rep; 2006 Oct; 47(5):1. PubMed ID: 17117600
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Failure to determine breech position: M.D. or R.N. duty? Case in point: Alvis v. Henderson Obstetrics, S.C. (592 N.E.2d 678--[1992]).
    Tammelleo AD
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1992 Sep; 33(4):4. PubMed ID: 1410395
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. "Asleep on duty" record impacts delay in delivery case. Case in point: St. Paul Medical Center v. Cecil (842 S.W.2d 808--TX [1992]).
    Tammelleo AD
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1993 Mar; 33(10):2. PubMed ID: 8493317
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The Darling case: ten years later.
    Springer EW
    Hosp Med Staff; 1975 Jun; 4(6):1-7. PubMed ID: 10237792
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Liability for failure to spot inconsistency in orders. Case in point: St. Germain v. Pfeifer 637 N.E.2d 848 MA (1994).
    Tammelleo AD
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1994 Sep; 35(4):2. PubMed ID: 7972845
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Mystery nurse reports child's sexually transmitted disease in error. Case in point: Perez v. Bay Area Hospital (829 P. Rptr. 2d 700--OR [1992]).
    Tammelleo AD
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1992 Jul; 33(2):4. PubMed ID: 1509091
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Failure to chart that Dr. was notified of pt.'s deterioration. Case in point: Sweeney v. Purvis 665 So. 2d 926--AL (1995).
    Tammelleo AD
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1996 Mar; 36(10):2. PubMed ID: 8711110
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Doctor "on call": ER nurse sued. Case in point: Bartimus v. Paxton Community Hosp. (458 N.E. 2d 1072 - IL).
    Regan WA
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1984 Mar; 24(10):4. PubMed ID: 6561693
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Nurse fails to follow "doctor's policy": death results. Case in point: Hartman v. Riverside Methodist Hosp. (577 N.E.2d 112--OH (1989)).
    Tammelleo AD
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1991 Nov; 32(6):2. PubMed ID: 1722340
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Is there a nurse-patient privilege? Case in point: Roberson by Isaac v. Liu (555 N.E. 2d 999--IL (1990)).
    Tammelleo AD
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1990 Sep; 31(4):2. PubMed ID: 2217817
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.