These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
65 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1303703)
41. Report does not show that there is no relationship between disc appearance and sensitivity to intraocular pressure. Spaeth GL Arch Ophthalmol; 2000 Oct; 118(10):1465-6. PubMed ID: 11030843 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
42. Coexistent optic disc pit and ocular hypertension misdiagnosed as glaucoma. Hingorani M; Mooney D; Singh A Eye (Lond); 1994; 8 ( Pt 5)():603-5. PubMed ID: 7835465 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
43. Association of disk size and glaucomatous cupping. Libre PE Am J Ophthalmol; 2003 Aug; 136(2):398; author reply 398. PubMed ID: 12888090 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
44. [Examinations of the cornea and anterior chamber angle region with a laser tomographic scanner (LTS)]. Marahrens P; Jean B; Thiel HJ; Zinser G Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 1990 Sep; 197(3):244-9. PubMed ID: 2255167 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Simultaneous stereophotography. Its value in clinical assessment of the topography of the optic cup. Kottler MS; Drance SM; Schulzer M Can J Ophthalmol; 1975 Oct; 10(4):453-7. PubMed ID: 1192265 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Discriminating between early glaucoma and ocular hypertension: diagnostic accuracy of pattern electroretinogram and confocal scanning laser optic disc morphometry. Colotto A; Salgarello T; Falsini B; Galan ME; Giudiceandrea A; Piccardi M; Scullica L Acta Ophthalmol Scand Suppl; 2000; (232):40-1. PubMed ID: 11235529 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
53. [Comparison of the measurement values of the laser tomography scanner and optic nerve head analyzer. A clinical study]. Maier H; Siebert M; Gramer E Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 1995 Feb; 206(2):107-14. PubMed ID: 7739189 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. The confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscopy ancillary study to the ocular hypertension treatment study: study design and baseline factors. Zangwill LM; Weinreb RN; Berry CC; Smith AR; Dirkes KA; Liebmann JM; Brandt JD; Trick G; Cioffi GA; Coleman AL; Piltz-Seymour JR; Gordon MO; Kass MA; Am J Ophthalmol; 2004 Feb; 137(2):219-27. PubMed ID: 14962409 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. [Glaucoma parameters of the papilla. Comparison of clinical and stereophotography methods with laser scanning tomography]. Spiegel D; Pfeiffer AM; Lachenmayr BJ; Hintschich C Ophthalmologe; 1992 Jun; 89(3):204-9. PubMed ID: 1303703 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. A comparison of healthy, ocular hypertensive, and glaucomatous optic disc topographic parameters. Iester M; Broadway DC; Mikelberg FS; Drance SM J Glaucoma; 1997 Dec; 6(6):363-70. PubMed ID: 9407364 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Reproducibility of photogrammetric optic disc cup measurements. Takamoto T; Schwartz B Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1985 Jun; 26(6):814-7. PubMed ID: 4008193 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]