125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 13041263)
1. [The symptomatic value of perseverance of ideas in brain injury].
MEYERHOFF H
Arch Psychiatr Nervenkr Z Gesamte Neurol Psychiatr; 1952; 189(5):407-20. PubMed ID: 13041263
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. The availability of conflictful ideas: a neglected parameter in assessing projective test responses.
KAGAN J; MOSS HA
J Pers; 1961 Jun; 29():217-34. PubMed ID: 13750698
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. The rotation of drawings by brain-damaged patients.
YATES AJ
J Abnorm Psychol; 1956 Sep; 53(2):178-81. PubMed ID: 13357211
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. The figure-ground syndrome in the brain-injured child.
WERNER H; WEIR A
Int Rec Med Gen Pract Clin; 1956 Jun; 169(6):362-7. PubMed ID: 13318757
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Tactual-kinesthetic perception as a technique for diagnosing brain damage.
PARKER JW
J Consult Psychol; 1954 Dec; 18(6):415-20. PubMed ID: 13221703
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Psychological diagnosis of intracranial pathology after accident.
FRIEDMAN A
Acta Psychother Psychosom Orthopaedagog; 1956; 4(4):352-7. PubMed ID: 13410644
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Rotation errors made by brain-injured and familial children on two visual-motor tests.
HALPIN VG
Am J Ment Defic; 1954 Jan; 59(3):485-9. PubMed ID: 13218067
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Projective techniques and the theory of thinking.
RAPAPORT D
J Proj Tech; 1952 Sep; 16(3):269-75. PubMed ID: 14946751
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. [NEUROSES AFTER CRANIOCEREBRAL INJURIES IN CHILDREN AND THEIR DIFFERENTIATION FROM THE RESULTANT ORGANIC CONDITIONS].
GEISLER E; JENSEN HP
Arztl Forsch; 1964 Nov; 18():582-9. PubMed ID: 14333027
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Mosaic patterns of institutionalized mental defectives.
SHOTWELL AM; LAWRENCE ES
Am J Ment Defic; 1951 Jul; 56(1):161-8. PubMed ID: 14857010
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. [The pictogram. Problem of individual approach to interpreting the results].
Khersonskiĭ BG
Zh Nevropatol Psikhiatr Im S S Korsakova; 1981; 81(12):1832-8. PubMed ID: 7041489
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Projective drawings of brain-injured subjects.
Kunce JT; Worley B
Percept Mot Skills; 1966 Feb; 22(1):163-8. PubMed ID: 4379417
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. The effectiveness of clinicians' judgments; the diagnosis of organic brain damage from the Bender-Gestalt test.
GOLDBERG LR
J Consult Psychol; 1959 Feb; 23(1):25-33. PubMed ID: 13641486
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Stimulusresponse analysis of inferences from projective test behavior.
BROWNELL MH; GOSS AE
J Pers; 1957 Sep; 25(5):525-38. PubMed ID: 13463721
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. [THE SIGNIFICANCE OF EARLY BRAIN DAMAGE IN CHILDREN FOR CHILDHOOD NEUROSIS].
LEMPP R
Acta Paedopsychiatr; 1964 May; 31():152-7. PubMed ID: 14158484
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Differentiation of brain damage among low IQ subjects with three projective techniques.
Wagner EE; Klein I; Walter T
J Pers Assess; 1978 Feb; 42(1):49-55. PubMed ID: 342684
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. An index of pathological thinking in the Rorschach.
WATKINS JG; STAUFFACHER JC
J Proj Tech; 1952 Sep; 16(3):276-86. PubMed ID: 14946752
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. [Lack of drive in thinking as a result of brain injury].
BUSEMANN A
Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 1947 Nov; 72(41-42):601. PubMed ID: 18905301
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. [Clinical significance of "empty symbolism" in pictograms].
Khersonskiĭ BG
Zh Nevropatol Psikhiatr Im S S Korsakova; 1979; 79(12):1743-7. PubMed ID: 393015
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The negation TAT; a projective method for eliciting repressed thought content.
JONES RM
J Proj Tech; 1956 Sep; 20(3):297-303. PubMed ID: 13346668
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
