These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 13052881)
1. The role of irrelevant drive stimuli in learning. LEVINE S J Exp Psychol; 1953 Jun; 45(6):410-6. PubMed ID: 13052881 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. The role of irrelevant drive stimuli in learning theory. ENINGER MU J Exp Psychol; 1951 Jun; 41(6):446-9. PubMed ID: 14873873 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. The principle of selective association of drive stimuli. WOODBURY CB; WILDER DH J Exp Psychol; 1954 May; 47(5):301-2. PubMed ID: 13163346 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Incidental versus focal presentation of drive-related stimuli. PINE F J Abnorm Soc Psychol; 1961 May; 62():482-90. PubMed ID: 14486719 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. LEARNING OF RESPONSES TO STIMULUS CLASSES AND TO SPECIFIC STIMULI. COHEN BH; HUT PA J Exp Psychol; 1963 Sep; 66():274-80. PubMed ID: 14047766 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Learning sets from minimum stimuli in retardates. HOUSE BJ; ZEAMAN D J Comp Physiol Psychol; 1963 Aug; 56():735-9. PubMed ID: 13955063 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Paired-associate learning when the same items occur as stimuli and responses. YOUNG RK J Exp Psychol; 1961 Apr; 61():315-8. PubMed ID: 13787487 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Acquired distinctiveness of form stimuli. NORTH AJ J Comp Physiol Psychol; 1959 Jun; 52(3):339-41. PubMed ID: 13673121 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Analysis of double alternation in terms of patterns of stimuli and responses. SCHOONARD JW; RESTLE F J Exp Psychol; 1961 May; 61():365-7. PubMed ID: 13748497 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Wave-length generalization as a function of spacing of test stimuli. FRIEDMAN H J Exp Psychol; 1963 Apr; 65():334-8. PubMed ID: 13959804 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Hunger drive and reinforcing effect of novel stimuli. CHAPMAN RM; LEVY N J Comp Physiol Psychol; 1957 Jun; 50(3):233-8. PubMed ID: 13463156 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. BACKWARD LEARNING AND THE STIMULUS-FAMILIARIZATION INHIBITORY EFFECT. SIMON S; WOOD G J Exp Psychol; 1964 Apr; 67():310-5. PubMed ID: 14165643 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Stimulus similarity and sequence of stimulus presentation in paired-associate learning. ROTHKOPF EZ J Exp Psychol; 1958 Aug; 56(2):114-22. PubMed ID: 13575707 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Paired-associate learning as a function of similarity: common stimulus and response items within the list. UMEMOTO T; HILGARD ER J Exp Psychol; 1961 Aug; 62():97-104. PubMed ID: 13779140 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Extinction as a function of frustration drive and frustration-drive stimulus. BERNSTEIN BB J Exp Psychol; 1957 Aug; 54(2):89-95. PubMed ID: 13475632 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. FUNCTIONAL STIMULUS LEARNING AS RELATED TO DEGREE OF PRACTICE AND MEANINGFULNESS. LEICHT KL; KAUSLER DH J Exp Psychol; 1965 Jan; 69():100-1. PubMed ID: 14256239 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]