These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 13052881)

  • 21. The interaction of ability and amount of practice with stimulus and response meaningfulness (m, m) in paired-associate learning.
    CIEUTAT VJ; STOCKWELL FE; NOBLE CE
    J Exp Psychol; 1958 Sep; 56(3):193-202. PubMed ID: 13575720
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Stimulus meaning in stimulus predifferentiation.
    PFAFFLIN SM
    J Exp Psychol; 1960 Apr; 59():269-74. PubMed ID: 14432498
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Factors in the recovery from approach-avoidance conflict.
    BERKUN MM
    J Exp Psychol; 1957 Jul; 54(1):65-73. PubMed ID: 13449252
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Learning through stimulus satiation.
    DENNY MR
    J Exp Psychol; 1957 Jul; 54(1):62-4. PubMed ID: 13449251
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. EFFECT OF SUCCESSIVE ADDITION OF STIMULUS ELEMENTS ON PAIRED-ASSOCIATE LEARNING.
    BROWN SC; BATTIG WF; PEARLSTEIN R
    J Exp Psychol; 1965 Jul; 70():87-93. PubMed ID: 14315136
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The role of stimulus satiation in spontaneous alternation.
    GLANZER M
    J Exp Psychol; 1953 Jun; 45(6):387-93. PubMed ID: 13052878
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. TRANSPOSITION IN ADULTS WITH SIMULTANEOUS AND SUCCESSIVE STIMULUS PRESENTATION.
    ZEILER MD
    J Exp Psychol; 1964 Jul; 68():103-7. PubMed ID: 14177672
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Further studies of reminiscence effects with variations in stimulus-response relationships.
    RILEY DA
    J Exp Psychol; 1954 Aug; 48(2):101-5. PubMed ID: 13192260
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The effect of post-stimulus conditions on the secondary reinforcing power of a stimulus.
    KEEHN JD
    J Comp Physiol Psychol; 1962 Feb; 55():22-6. PubMed ID: 14454778
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Supplementary report: stimulus and response meaningfulness (m) in paired-associate learning by hospitalized mental patients.
    CIEUTAT VJ
    J Exp Psychol; 1959 Dec; 58():490. PubMed ID: 13810299
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Supplementary report: stimulus familiarization in paired-associate learning.
    SCHULZ RW; TUCKER IF
    J Exp Psychol; 1962 Nov; 64():549-50. PubMed ID: 13987268
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Stimulus context and satiation.
    KIVY PN; EARL RW; WALKER EL
    J Comp Physiol Psychol; 1956 Feb; 49(1):90-2. PubMed ID: 13295415
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Associative and retroactive inhibition as a function of the drive stimulus.
    WICKENS DD; HALL J; REID LS
    J Comp Physiol Psychol; 1949 Oct; 42(5):398-403. PubMed ID: 18143118
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Motivational properties of frustration: II. Frustration drive stimulus and frustration reduction in selective learning.
    AMSEL A; WARD JS
    J Exp Psychol; 1954 Jul; 48(1):37-47. PubMed ID: 13174731
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Amount of pretraining as a factor in stimulus predifferentiation and performance set.
    CANTOR JH
    J Exp Psychol; 1955 Sep; 50(3):180-4. PubMed ID: 13252194
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Evidence that the secondary reinforcing stimulus must be discriminated.
    McGUIGAN FJ; CROCKETT F
    J Exp Psychol; 1958 Feb; 55(2):184-7. PubMed ID: 13513934
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Effect of stimulus-response meaningfulness on paired-associate learning and retention.
    KOTHURKAR VK
    J Exp Psychol; 1963 Mar; 65():305-8. PubMed ID: 14035071
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Transposition in the white rat as a function of stimulus comparison.
    THOMPSON R
    J Exp Psychol; 1955 Sep; 50(3):185-90. PubMed ID: 13252195
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Effects of an anchor stimulus on the stimulus generalization gradient.
    GANZ L
    J Exp Psychol; 1963 Mar; 65():270-9. PubMed ID: 13946425
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Stimulus alternation in peripherally blinded rats.
    DEMBER WN
    Can J Psychol; 1958 Dec; 12(4):219-21. PubMed ID: 13608335
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.