These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

77 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1306437)

  • 21. A comparison of stress and strain distribution characteristics of two different rigid implant designs for distal-extension fixed prostheses.
    Akpinar I; Demirel F; Parnas L; Sahin S
    Quintessence Int; 1996 Jan; 27(1):11-7. PubMed ID: 9063207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Photoelastic study of the support structures of distal-extension removable partial dentures.
    Costa MM; da Silva MA; Oliveira SA; Gomes VL; Carvalho PM; Lucas BL
    J Prosthodont; 2009 Oct; 18(7):589-95. PubMed ID: 19531158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Comparison of load transfer by angulated, standard and inclined implant abutments.
    Tuncelli B; Poyrazoglu E; Köylüoglu AM; Tezcan S
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 1997 Jun; 5(2):85-8. PubMed ID: 9487817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. [The 3D finite element analysis of stress distributions in abutment and periodontal tissues with extra-coronal attachment].
    Zhang A; Liu Z; Mu Y; Qian Y; Fan Y
    Sheng Wu Yi Xue Gong Cheng Xue Za Zhi; 2007 Aug; 24(4):717-20. PubMed ID: 17899730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. [Effect of stress distribution of support tissues using attachment prostheses with different number of abutment].
    Ling YH; Zhang FQ; Han JL
    Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue; 2006 Dec; 15(6):632-6. PubMed ID: 17533718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The dynamic natures of implant loading.
    Wang RF; Kang B; Lang LA; Razzoog ME
    J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Jun; 101(6):359-71. PubMed ID: 19463663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Biodynamics of attachments used in overdentures: experimental analysis with photoelasticity.
    Labaig C; Marco R; Fons A; Selva EJ
    Quintessence Int; 1997 Mar; 28(3):183-90. PubMed ID: 9452685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Comparison of stress distribution around vertical and angled implants with finite-element analysis.
    Canay S; Hersek N; Akpinar I; Aşik Z
    Quintessence Int; 1996 Sep; 27(9):591-8. PubMed ID: 9180415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Two-dimensional finite element analysis of the influence of bridge design on stress distribution in bone tissues surrounding fixtures of osseointegrated implants in the lower molar region.
    Arataki T; Adachi Y; Kishi M
    Bull Tokyo Dent Coll; 1998 Aug; 39(3):199-209. PubMed ID: 9927906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The influence of abutment angulation on micromotion level for immediately loaded dental implants: a 3-D finite element analysis.
    Kao HC; Gung YW; Chung TF; Hsu ML
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008; 23(4):623-30. PubMed ID: 18807557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Biomechanical aspects of bone-level diameter shifting at implant-abutment interface.
    Canay S; Akça K
    Implant Dent; 2009 Jun; 18(3):239-48. PubMed ID: 19509534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The influence of stress on edentulous maxillary bone with different artificial anterior tooth arrangements by three-dimensional photoelasticity.
    Yu D; Zhu S; Lian M; Guan L; Lu S; Ma W
    Chin J Dent Res; 1998 Dec; 1(3):38-43. PubMed ID: 10557172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. [Analysis of the movement of long axis and the distribution of principal stress in abutment tooth retained by conical telescope].
    Lin YH; Man Y; Qu YL; Guan DH; Lu X; Wei N
    Sichuan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2006 Jan; 37(1):129-32. PubMed ID: 16468661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. [Mesially inclined lower right 2nd molar used as abutment for a bonded bridge to cover a defective lower right 1st molar].
    Fujiyama E; Shimizu H
    Hotetsu Rinsho; 1984; 17(2):166-7. PubMed ID: 6396608
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Effect of platform switching on implant crest bone stress: a finite element analysis.
    Schrotenboer J; Tsao YP; Kinariwala V; Wang HL
    Implant Dent; 2009 Jun; 18(3):260-9. PubMed ID: 19509536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Influence of abutment height on strain in a mandibular overdenture.
    Dong J; Ikebe K; Gonda T; Nokubi T
    J Oral Rehabil; 2006 Aug; 33(8):594-9. PubMed ID: 16856957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Biomechanical interactions in tooth-implant-supported fixed partial dentures with variations in the number of splinted teeth and connector type: a finite element analysis.
    Lin CL; Wang JC; Chang WJ
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2008 Jan; 19(1):107-17. PubMed ID: 17944965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Biomechanical response of implant systems placed in the maxillary posterior region under various conditions of angulation, bone density, and loading.
    Lin CL; Wang JC; Ramp LC; Liu PR
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008; 23(1):57-64. PubMed ID: 18416413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. A finite element analysis of a mandibular canine as a denture abutment.
    O'Grady J; Sheriff M; Likeman P
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 1996 Sep; 4(3):117-21. PubMed ID: 9171017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. [Experimental research on the stresses in roots with a pin "stump" structural element and in the periodontium of the masticatory teeth using a photoelasticity method].
    Tsukanova FN; Serdobintsev IuP; Slavin OK
    Stomatologiia (Mosk); 1991; (4):18-21. PubMed ID: 1780923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.