These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1306551)
21. The systematic assessment of variations in medical practices and their outcomes. Krakauer H; Bailey RC; Cooper H; Yu WK; Skellan KJ; Kattakkuzhy G Public Health Rep; 1995; 110(1):2-12. PubMed ID: 7838939 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Watchdog on a short chain. How good are PPS's quality-of-care reviewers? Kotelchuck R Health PAC Bull; 1987 Jun; 17(3):19-22. PubMed ID: 10301612 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. HCFA's close encounter with CQI. QRC Advis; 1992 May; 8(7):1-7. PubMed ID: 10118704 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Using administrative data to screen hospitals for high complication rates. Iezzoni LI; Daley J; Heeren T; Foley SM; Hughes JS; Fisher ES; Duncan CC; Coffman GA Inquiry; 1994; 31(1):40-55. PubMed ID: 8168908 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. The role of the PROs. Scala M Issue Brief Cent Medicare Educ; 2001; 2(2):1-8. PubMed ID: 11859894 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. The surgical infection prevention and surgical care improvement projects: national initiatives to improve outcomes for patients having surgery. Bratzler DW; Hunt DR Clin Infect Dis; 2006 Aug; 43(3):322-30. PubMed ID: 16804848 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. The evolving scope of PROs. Interview by Jane Stein. Weiser RR Bus Health; 1987 Nov; 5(1):46-8. PubMed ID: 10284429 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Medicare mortality calculations won't include admission-related severity adjustments this year. Gardner E Mod Healthc; 1993 Feb; 23(7):66. PubMed ID: 10124054 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Perspectives. Cops or colleagues? Fuzzy standards for judging PROs. Cunningham R Faulkner Grays Med Health; 1996 May; 50(20):suppl 1-4. PubMed ID: 10156158 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. HCFA's health care quality improvement program and physicians. Lapin PJ; Jencks SF J Fla Med Assoc; 1998 Apr; 85(1):8-9. PubMed ID: 9782719 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. What surgeons should know about peer review organizations and quality intervention plans. Stombler RE Bull Am Coll Surg; 1991 Feb; 76(2):6-7. PubMed ID: 10109294 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Proposed Medicare regulations: denial of payment for substandard quality care and review of beneficiary complaints. Cummins JR Ky Hosp Mag; 1989; 6(4):22, 24, 26. PubMed ID: 10304158 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Do cancer centers designated by the National Cancer Institute have better surgical outcomes? Birkmeyer NJ; Goodney PP; Stukel TA; Hillner BE; Birkmeyer JD Cancer; 2005 Feb; 103(3):435-41. PubMed ID: 15622523 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Peer review of HMOs is here--or is it? Kirchner M Med Econ; 1988 Oct; 65(19):99-101, 104-5. PubMed ID: 10288977 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. HCFA's Medicare mortality statistics for a New Jersey hospital. Damato AN; Reisner M; Patel A N J Med; 1995 Jul; 92(7):444-6. PubMed ID: 7659305 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]