These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

234 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1306739)

  • 1. Early in vitro marginal microleakage associated with different lining materials under Class II amalgam restorations.
    Youngson CC; Holguin SM
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 1992 Dec; 1(2):73-7. PubMed ID: 1306739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effect of a copal varnish, ZOE or glass ionomer cement bases on microleakage of amalgam restorations.
    Manders CA; Garcia-Godoy F; Barnwell GM
    Am J Dent; 1990 Apr; 3(2):63-6. PubMed ID: 2076225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The use of liners under amalgam restorations: an in vitro study on marginal leakage.
    Marchiori S; Baratieri LN; de Andrada MA; Monteiro Júnior S; Ritter AV
    Quintessence Int; 1998 Oct; 29(10):637-42. PubMed ID: 9922761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. In vitro microleakage of luting cements and crown foundation material.
    Lindquist TJ; Connolly J
    J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Mar; 85(3):292-8. PubMed ID: 11264938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Microleakage of bonded amalgam restorations using different adhesive agents with dye under vacuum: an in vitro study.
    Parolia A; Kundabala M; Gupta V; Verma M; Batra C; Shenoy R; Srikant N
    Indian J Dent Res; 2011; 22(2):252-5. PubMed ID: 21891895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A comparison of glass-ionomer cement and calcium hydroxide liners in amalgam restorations.
    Rabchinsky J; Donly KJ
    Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 1993 Aug; 13(4):378-83. PubMed ID: 8300324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. In vitro microleakage associated with posterior composite restorations used with different base/bonding system combinations.
    Youngson CC; Grey NJ; Jones JG; Redfern E
    Dent Mater; 1991 Oct; 7(4):240-6. PubMed ID: 1814770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparative quantitative and qualitative assessment of the marginal adaptation and apposition of bonded amalgam restorations using luting glass ionomer and 4-META adhesive liner under a scanning electron microscope. An in vitro study.
    Abraham MM; Sudeep PT; Bhat KS
    Indian J Dent Res; 1999; 10(2):43-53. PubMed ID: 10865391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. In vitro marginal leakage of cervical composite restorations lined with a light-cured glass ionomer.
    Sidhu SK; Henderson LJ
    Oper Dent; 1992; 17(1):7-12. PubMed ID: 1437685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effects of lining materials on microleakage and internal voids of Class II resin-based composite restorations.
    Chuang SF; Jin YT; Lin TS; Chang CH; García-Godoy F
    Am J Dent; 2003 Apr; 16(2):84-90. PubMed ID: 12797564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. SEM and microleakage evaluation of the marginal integrity of two types of class V restorations with or without the use of a light-curable coating material and of polishing.
    Magni E; Zhang L; Hickel R; Bossù M; Polimeni A; Ferrari M
    J Dent; 2008 Nov; 36(11):885-91. PubMed ID: 18757129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Quantitative microleakage evaluation around amalgam restorations with different treatments on cavity walls.
    de Morais PM; Rodrigues Júnior AL; Pimenta LA
    Oper Dent; 1999; 24(4):217-22. PubMed ID: 10823067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Microleakage and retention of bonded amalgam restorations.
    Winkler MM; Moore BK; Rhodes B; Swartz M
    Am J Dent; 2000 Oct; 13(5):245-50. PubMed ID: 11764110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Microleakage under amalgam restorations lined with Copalite, Amalgambond Plus, and Vitrebond.
    Newman JE; Hondrum SO; Clem DB
    Gen Dent; 1996; 44(4):340-4. PubMed ID: 8957830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Microleakage of bonded amalgam restorations: effect of thermal cycling.
    Helvatjoglou-Antoniades M; Theodoridou-Pahini S; Papadogiannis Y; Karezis A
    Oper Dent; 2000; 25(4):316-23. PubMed ID: 11203837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Microleakage of amalgam cavity treatment systems: an in vitro evaluation.
    Morrow LA; Wilson NH; Setcos JC; Watts DC
    Am J Dent; 2002 Aug; 15(4):262-7. PubMed ID: 12572646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. In vitro microleakage of Class V composite resin restorations with and without light-cured glass-ionomer (poly alkenoate) cement lining.
    Shortall AC
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 1992 Sep; 1(1):7-11. PubMed ID: 1291025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Bonded amalgam restorations: using a glass-ionomer as an adhesive liner.
    Chen RS; Liu CC; Cheng MR; Lin CP
    Oper Dent; 2000; 25(5):411-7. PubMed ID: 11203849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Dentin adhesive superior to copal varnish in preventing microleakage in primary teeth.
    Royse MC; Ott NW; Mathieu GP
    Pediatr Dent; 1996; 18(7):440-3. PubMed ID: 8970205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Microleakage of amalgam restorations using dentin bonding system primers.
    Berry FA; Parker SD; Rice D; Muñoz CA
    Am J Dent; 1996 Aug; 9(4):174-8. PubMed ID: 9002794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.