239 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1306739)
1. Early in vitro marginal microleakage associated with different lining materials under Class II amalgam restorations.
Youngson CC; Holguin SM
Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 1992 Dec; 1(2):73-7. PubMed ID: 1306739
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effect of a copal varnish, ZOE or glass ionomer cement bases on microleakage of amalgam restorations.
Manders CA; Garcia-Godoy F; Barnwell GM
Am J Dent; 1990 Apr; 3(2):63-6. PubMed ID: 2076225
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The use of liners under amalgam restorations: an in vitro study on marginal leakage.
Marchiori S; Baratieri LN; de Andrada MA; Monteiro Júnior S; Ritter AV
Quintessence Int; 1998 Oct; 29(10):637-42. PubMed ID: 9922761
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. In vitro microleakage of luting cements and crown foundation material.
Lindquist TJ; Connolly J
J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Mar; 85(3):292-8. PubMed ID: 11264938
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Microleakage of bonded amalgam restorations using different adhesive agents with dye under vacuum: an in vitro study.
Parolia A; Kundabala M; Gupta V; Verma M; Batra C; Shenoy R; Srikant N
Indian J Dent Res; 2011; 22(2):252-5. PubMed ID: 21891895
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A comparison of glass-ionomer cement and calcium hydroxide liners in amalgam restorations.
Rabchinsky J; Donly KJ
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 1993 Aug; 13(4):378-83. PubMed ID: 8300324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. In vitro microleakage associated with posterior composite restorations used with different base/bonding system combinations.
Youngson CC; Grey NJ; Jones JG; Redfern E
Dent Mater; 1991 Oct; 7(4):240-6. PubMed ID: 1814770
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparative quantitative and qualitative assessment of the marginal adaptation and apposition of bonded amalgam restorations using luting glass ionomer and 4-META adhesive liner under a scanning electron microscope. An in vitro study.
Abraham MM; Sudeep PT; Bhat KS
Indian J Dent Res; 1999; 10(2):43-53. PubMed ID: 10865391
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. In vitro marginal leakage of cervical composite restorations lined with a light-cured glass ionomer.
Sidhu SK; Henderson LJ
Oper Dent; 1992; 17(1):7-12. PubMed ID: 1437685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effects of lining materials on microleakage and internal voids of Class II resin-based composite restorations.
Chuang SF; Jin YT; Lin TS; Chang CH; García-Godoy F
Am J Dent; 2003 Apr; 16(2):84-90. PubMed ID: 12797564
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. SEM and microleakage evaluation of the marginal integrity of two types of class V restorations with or without the use of a light-curable coating material and of polishing.
Magni E; Zhang L; Hickel R; Bossù M; Polimeni A; Ferrari M
J Dent; 2008 Nov; 36(11):885-91. PubMed ID: 18757129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Quantitative microleakage evaluation around amalgam restorations with different treatments on cavity walls.
de Morais PM; Rodrigues Júnior AL; Pimenta LA
Oper Dent; 1999; 24(4):217-22. PubMed ID: 10823067
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Microleakage and retention of bonded amalgam restorations.
Winkler MM; Moore BK; Rhodes B; Swartz M
Am J Dent; 2000 Oct; 13(5):245-50. PubMed ID: 11764110
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Microleakage under amalgam restorations lined with Copalite, Amalgambond Plus, and Vitrebond.
Newman JE; Hondrum SO; Clem DB
Gen Dent; 1996; 44(4):340-4. PubMed ID: 8957830
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Microleakage of bonded amalgam restorations: effect of thermal cycling.
Helvatjoglou-Antoniades M; Theodoridou-Pahini S; Papadogiannis Y; Karezis A
Oper Dent; 2000; 25(4):316-23. PubMed ID: 11203837
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Microleakage of amalgam cavity treatment systems: an in vitro evaluation.
Morrow LA; Wilson NH; Setcos JC; Watts DC
Am J Dent; 2002 Aug; 15(4):262-7. PubMed ID: 12572646
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. In vitro microleakage of Class V composite resin restorations with and without light-cured glass-ionomer (poly alkenoate) cement lining.
Shortall AC
Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 1992 Sep; 1(1):7-11. PubMed ID: 1291025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Bonded amalgam restorations: using a glass-ionomer as an adhesive liner.
Chen RS; Liu CC; Cheng MR; Lin CP
Oper Dent; 2000; 25(5):411-7. PubMed ID: 11203849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Dentin adhesive superior to copal varnish in preventing microleakage in primary teeth.
Royse MC; Ott NW; Mathieu GP
Pediatr Dent; 1996; 18(7):440-3. PubMed ID: 8970205
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Microleakage of amalgam restorations using dentin bonding system primers.
Berry FA; Parker SD; Rice D; Muñoz CA
Am J Dent; 1996 Aug; 9(4):174-8. PubMed ID: 9002794
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
