These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

67 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1306789)

  • 1. [An experimental study of the process of bony ingrowth into inorganic bone-particle impregnated bone cement].
    Dai KR
    Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi; 1992 Oct; 30(10):588-9, 635. PubMed ID: 1306789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [The biological fixation strength of the bone particle impregnated bone cement].
    Dong F
    Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi; 1992 Oct; 30(10):590-2, 635. PubMed ID: 1306790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Hydroxyapatite impregnated bone cement: in vitro and in vivo studies.
    Kwon SY; Kim YS; Woo YK; Kim SS; Park JB
    Biomed Mater Eng; 1997; 7(2):129-40. PubMed ID: 9262826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Bone-particle-impregnated bone cement: an in vivo weight-bearing study.
    Dai KR; Liu YK; Park JB; Clark CR; Nishiyama K; Zheng ZK
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1991 Feb; 25(2):141-56. PubMed ID: 2055912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [An in vivo study of inorganic bone particle-impregnated bone cement].
    Dai KR
    Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi; 1989 May; 27(5):309-13, 319. PubMed ID: 2806013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effect of bone mineral particles on the porosity of bone cement.
    Kim YS; Kang YH; Kim JK; Park JB
    Biomed Mater Eng; 1994; 4(1):37-46. PubMed ID: 7920193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Bioresorption behavior of tetracalcium phosphate-derived calcium phosphate cement implanted in femur of rabbits.
    Tsai CH; Lin RM; Ju CP; Chern Lin JH
    Biomaterials; 2008 Mar; 29(8):984-93. PubMed ID: 18096221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Penetration and shear strength of cement-bone interfaces in vivo.
    MacDonald W; Swarts E; Beaver R
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1993 Jan; (286):283-8. PubMed ID: 8425359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Reduction in cement-bone interface shear strength between primary and revision arthroplasty.
    Dohmae Y; Bechtold JE; Sherman RE; Puno RM; Gustilo RB
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1988 Nov; (236):214-20. PubMed ID: 3180573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Bone-implant interface and remaining tissues on the implant surface after push-out test: an SEM observation.
    Li J
    Biomed Mater Eng; 1997; 7(6):379-85. PubMed ID: 9622105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Mechanical characteristics of the bone-graft-cement interface after impaction allografting.
    Frei H; Mitchell P; Masri BA; Duncan CP; Oxland TR
    J Orthop Res; 2005 Jan; 23(1):9-17. PubMed ID: 15607869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Intercalary replacement of canine femora using a new bioactive bone cement.
    Senaha Y; Nakamura T; Tamura J; Kawanabe K; Iida H; Yamamuro T
    J Bone Joint Surg Br; 1996 Jan; 78(1):26-31. PubMed ID: 8898122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Bone formation under the influence of bone morphogenetic protein/self-setting apatite cement composite as a delivery system.
    Kamegai A; Shimamura N; Naitou K; Nagahara K; Kanematsu N; Mori M
    Biomed Mater Eng; 1994; 4(4):291-307. PubMed ID: 7950877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Biological and mechanical changes of the bone graft-cement interface after impaction allografting.
    Frei H; O'Connell J; Masri BA; Duncan CP; Oxland TR
    J Orthop Res; 2005 Nov; 23(6):1271-9. PubMed ID: 15964167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. In vitro interface and cement mantle analysis of different femur stem designs.
    Gravius S; Wirtz DC; Siebert CH; Andereya S; Mueller-Rath R; Maus U; Mumme T
    J Biomech; 2008; 41(9):2021-8. PubMed ID: 18514207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A study of the bioactive bone cement--bone interface: quantitative and histological evaluation.
    Nishimura N; Taguchi Y; Yamamuro T; Nakamura T; Kokubo T; Yoshihara S
    J Appl Biomater; 1993; 4(1):29-38. PubMed ID: 10148343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Bone-particle-impregnated bone cement: an in vitro study.
    Liu YK; Park JB; Njus GO; Stienstra D
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1987 Feb; 21(2):247-61. PubMed ID: 3818684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Sustained pressurization of polymethylmethacrylate: a comparison of low- and moderate-viscosity bone cements.
    Bean DJ; Hollis JM; Woo SL; Convery FR
    J Orthop Res; 1988; 6(4):580-4. PubMed ID: 3379511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Osseointegration of a hydroxyapatite-coated multilayered mesh stem.
    Kusakabe H; Sakamaki T; Nihei K; Oyama Y; Yanagimoto S; Ichimiya M; Kimura J; Toyama Y
    Biomaterials; 2004 Jul; 25(15):2957-69. PubMed ID: 14967528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A study of the interface between bone and acrylic cement by scanning electron microscopy.
    Spinelli R
    Ital J Orthop Traumatol; 1976 Apr; 2(1):103-15. PubMed ID: 977313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.