These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

78 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1307012)

  • 1. Patients with atrophic mandibles: opinions regarding the benefit of preprosthetic surgery.
    van Waas MA; Kalk W; Engels SE
    Int J Prosthodont; 1992; 5(6):527-32. PubMed ID: 1307012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A comparison of different treatment strategies in patients with atrophic mandibles: a clinical evaluation after 6.5 years.
    Kalk W; van Waas MA; Engels SE
    Int J Prosthodont; 1992; 5(3):277-83. PubMed ID: 1524651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Implant-retained overdentures compared with complete dentures with or without preprosthetic surgery. A prospective study followed over 10 years].
    Meijer HJ; Raghoebar GM; van 't Hof MA
    Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd; 2005 Jan; 112(1):7-12. PubMed ID: 15693603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Conventional rehabilitation of edentulous patients: the impact on oral health-related quality of life and patient satisfaction.
    Ellis JS; Pelekis ND; Thomason JM
    J Prosthodont; 2007; 16(1):37-42. PubMed ID: 17244306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Implant-retained overdentures compared with complete dentures with or without preprosthetic surgery. Satisfaction and subjective chewing capabilities].
    Meijer HJ; Raghoebar GM; van 't Hof MA; Geertman ME
    Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd; 2002 Dec; 109(12):475-80. PubMed ID: 12572098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The cost of dental implants as compared to that of conventional strategies.
    van der Wijk P; Bouma J; van Waas MA; van Oort RP; Rutten FF
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1998; 13(4):546-53. PubMed ID: 9714962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A clinical trial of patient satisfaction and prosthodontic needs with ball and bar attachments for implant-retained complete overdentures: three-year results.
    MacEntee MI; Walton JN; Glick N
    J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Jan; 93(1):28-37. PubMed ID: 15623995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Implant-retained mandibular overdentures versus conventional dentures: 10 years of care and aftercare.
    Visser A; Meijer HJ; Raghoebar GM; Vissink A
    Int J Prosthodont; 2006; 19(3):271-8. PubMed ID: 16752625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Investigation of new complete denture quality and patients' satisfaction with and use of dentures after two years.
    Fenlon MR; Sherriff M
    J Dent; 2004 May; 32(4):327-33. PubMed ID: 15053917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Masticatory function and patient satisfaction with implant-supported mandibular overdentures: a prospective 5-year study.
    Bakke M; Holm B; Gotfredsen K
    Int J Prosthodont; 2002; 15(6):575-81. PubMed ID: 12475165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The functional deformation of maxillary complete dentures in patients with flabby alveolar ridges. Part II: After surgery.
    el Ghazali S; Nilner K; Wallenius K
    Swed Dent J; 1991; 15(2):63-70. PubMed ID: 2063263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The Endo-Distractor for preimplant mandibular regeneration.
    Krenkel C; Grunert I
    Rev Stomatol Chir Maxillofac; 2009 Feb; 110(1):17-26. PubMed ID: 19135219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A patient-based assessment of implant-stabilized and conventional complete dentures.
    Allen PF; McMillan AS; Walshaw D
    J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Feb; 85(2):141-7. PubMed ID: 11208203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Overdenture prostheses on implants versus complete dentures].
    Geertman ME; Boerrigter EM; van 't Hof MA; van Waas MA; van Oort RP; Kwakman JM; Boering G; Kalk W
    Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd; 1998 May; 105(5):174-7. PubMed ID: 11928421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparing the efficacy of mandibular implant-retained overdentures and conventional dentures among middle-aged edentulous patients: satisfaction and functional assessment.
    Awad MA; Lund JP; Dufresne E; Feine JS
    Int J Prosthodont; 2003; 16(2):117-22. PubMed ID: 12737240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. An investigation of factors influencing patients' satisfaction with new complete dentures using structural equation modelling.
    Fenlon MR; Sherriff M
    J Dent; 2008 Jun; 36(6):427-34. PubMed ID: 18417267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The influence of personality on patients' satisfaction with existing and new complete dentures.
    Fenlon MR; Sherriff M; Newton JT
    J Dent; 2007 Sep; 35(9):744-8. PubMed ID: 17659825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of implant-retained mandibular overdentures and conventional complete dentures: a 10-year prospective study of clinical aspects and patient satisfaction.
    Meijer HJ; Raghoebar GM; Van 't Hof MA
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2003; 18(6):879-85. PubMed ID: 14696664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effect of mandibular ridge height on patients' perceptions with mandibular conventional and implant-assisted overdentures.
    Kimoto K; Garrett NR
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2005; 20(5):762-8. PubMed ID: 16274151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A randomized prospective clinical trial on the effectiveness of three treatment modalities for patients with lower denture problems. A 10 year follow-up study on patient satisfaction.
    Raghoebar GM; Meijer HJ; van 't Hof M; Stegenga B; Vissink A
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2003 Oct; 32(5):498-503. PubMed ID: 14759108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.