These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1307882)

  • 1. Evaluation of a system for intragastric pH monitoring of intensive care unit patients: preliminary report.
    Clochesy JM
    Am J Crit Care; 1992 Jul; 1(1):81-4. PubMed ID: 1307882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A single intragastric pH electrode does not accurately measure intragastric acidity.
    Fisher RS; Sher DJ; Donahue D; Senior J; Krevsky B
    Am J Gastroenterol; 1996 Jun; 91(6):1167-72. PubMed ID: 8651165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Monitoring gastric pH levels.
    Durham RM; Weigelt JA
    Surg Gynecol Obstet; 1989 Jul; 169(1):14-6. PubMed ID: 2740964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Nasogastric omeprazole: effects on gastric pH in critically Ill patients.
    Balaban DH; Duckworth CW; Peura DA
    Am J Gastroenterol; 1997 Jan; 92(1):79-83. PubMed ID: 8995942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Using pH testing to confirm nasogastric tube position.
    Earley T
    Nurs Times; 2005 Sep 20-27; 101(38):24-6. PubMed ID: 16209390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Usefulness of a disposable nasogastric tube with a pH sensor--comparison with a class pH electrode].
    Okada M; Nakatsuka I; Konishi M; Noguchi J
    Masui; 1992 Jun; 41(6):904-8. PubMed ID: 1613948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Determination of a practical pH cutoff level for reliable confirmation of nasogastric tube placement.
    Gilbertson HR; Rogers EJ; Ukoumunne OC
    JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr; 2011 Jul; 35(4):540-4. PubMed ID: 21622643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Validation of the RightLevelpH Detector for Monitoring Gastric pH.
    Lambert CR; Varlotta D; Posey M; Heberlein JL; Shirley JM
    Am J Crit Care; 2015 May; 24(3):211-5. PubMed ID: 25934717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Twenty-four-hour esophageal impedance-pH monitoring in healthy preterm neonates: rate and characteristics of acid, weakly acidic, and weakly alkaline gastroesophageal reflux.
    López-Alonso M; Moya MJ; Cabo JA; Ribas J; del Carmen Macías M; Silny J; Sifrim D
    Pediatrics; 2006 Aug; 118(2):e299-308. PubMed ID: 16831894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Reproducibility of ambulatory intragastric pH monitoring.
    Baak LC; Jansen JB; Lamers CB
    Neth J Med; 1993 Oct; 43(3-4):100-4. PubMed ID: 8302388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Accuracy of acidity changes in the gastrointestinal tract as determined by pH-tubes with the internal and external comparison electrodes].
    Iakovlev GA
    Med Tekh; 2003; (4):42-6. PubMed ID: 14518116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Equivalence of litmus paper and intragastric pH probes for intragastric pH monitoring in the intensive care unit.
    Levine RL; Fromm RE; Mojtahedzadeh M; Baghaie AA; Opekun AR
    Crit Care Med; 1994 Jun; 22(6):945-8. PubMed ID: 7911416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Glass and antimony electrodes for long-term pH monitoring: a dynamic in vitro comparison.
    Geus WP; Smout AJ; Kooiman JC; Lamers CB; Gues JW
    Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 1995 Jan; 7(1):29-35. PubMed ID: 7866807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Accurate placement of the esophageal pH electrode for 24-hour pH monitoring using a combined pH/manometry probe.
    Klingler PJ; Hinder RA; Wetscher GJ; Davis DM; Achem SR; Seelig MH; O'Brien P; DeVault KR
    Am J Gastroenterol; 2000 Apr; 95(4):906-9. PubMed ID: 10763935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Simultaneous comparison of 24-hour intragastric pH recording using glass and antimony electrodes in man.
    Angerer M; Koelzow H; Londong W
    Dig Dis; 1990; 8 Suppl 1():38-45. PubMed ID: 2225518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effectiveness of pH measurements in predicting feeding tube placement.
    Metheny N; Williams P; Wiersema L; Wehrle MA; Eisenberg P; McSweeney M
    Nurs Res; 1989; 38(5):280-5. PubMed ID: 2508068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Regional differences in gastric acidity and antacid distribution: is a single pH electrode sufficient?
    Fisher RS; Sher DJ; Donahue D; Knight LC; Maurer A; Urbain JL; Krevsky B
    Am J Gastroenterol; 1997 Feb; 92(2):263-70. PubMed ID: 9040203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Assessment of gastric acidity in intensive care patients: intermittent pH registration cannot replace continuous pH monitoring.
    Bonten MJ; Gaillard CA; Stockbrügger RW; van Tiel FH; van der Geest S; Stobberingh EE
    Intensive Care Med; 1996 Mar; 22(3):220-5. PubMed ID: 8727435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of continuous pH-meter and intermittent pH paper monitoring of gastric pH in critically ill children.
    Solana MJ; López-Herce J; Sánchez C; Cordero M; Urbano J; Botrán M; Del Castillo J; Bellón JM; Carrillo A
    Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2012 Jan; 24(1):33-6. PubMed ID: 22016103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Prolonged pH monitoring: Bravo capsule.
    Pandolfino JE; Kahrilas PJ
    Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am; 2005 Apr; 15(2):307-18. PubMed ID: 15722243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.