BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1307882)

  • 1. Evaluation of a system for intragastric pH monitoring of intensive care unit patients: preliminary report.
    Clochesy JM
    Am J Crit Care; 1992 Jul; 1(1):81-4. PubMed ID: 1307882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A single intragastric pH electrode does not accurately measure intragastric acidity.
    Fisher RS; Sher DJ; Donahue D; Senior J; Krevsky B
    Am J Gastroenterol; 1996 Jun; 91(6):1167-72. PubMed ID: 8651165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Monitoring gastric pH levels.
    Durham RM; Weigelt JA
    Surg Gynecol Obstet; 1989 Jul; 169(1):14-6. PubMed ID: 2740964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Nasogastric omeprazole: effects on gastric pH in critically Ill patients.
    Balaban DH; Duckworth CW; Peura DA
    Am J Gastroenterol; 1997 Jan; 92(1):79-83. PubMed ID: 8995942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Using pH testing to confirm nasogastric tube position.
    Earley T
    Nurs Times; 2005 Sep 20-27; 101(38):24-6. PubMed ID: 16209390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Usefulness of a disposable nasogastric tube with a pH sensor--comparison with a class pH electrode].
    Okada M; Nakatsuka I; Konishi M; Noguchi J
    Masui; 1992 Jun; 41(6):904-8. PubMed ID: 1613948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Determination of a practical pH cutoff level for reliable confirmation of nasogastric tube placement.
    Gilbertson HR; Rogers EJ; Ukoumunne OC
    JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr; 2011 Jul; 35(4):540-4. PubMed ID: 21622643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Validation of the RightLevelpH Detector for Monitoring Gastric pH.
    Lambert CR; Varlotta D; Posey M; Heberlein JL; Shirley JM
    Am J Crit Care; 2015 May; 24(3):211-5. PubMed ID: 25934717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Twenty-four-hour esophageal impedance-pH monitoring in healthy preterm neonates: rate and characteristics of acid, weakly acidic, and weakly alkaline gastroesophageal reflux.
    López-Alonso M; Moya MJ; Cabo JA; Ribas J; del Carmen Macías M; Silny J; Sifrim D
    Pediatrics; 2006 Aug; 118(2):e299-308. PubMed ID: 16831894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Reproducibility of ambulatory intragastric pH monitoring.
    Baak LC; Jansen JB; Lamers CB
    Neth J Med; 1993 Oct; 43(3-4):100-4. PubMed ID: 8302388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Accuracy of acidity changes in the gastrointestinal tract as determined by pH-tubes with the internal and external comparison electrodes].
    Iakovlev GA
    Med Tekh; 2003; (4):42-6. PubMed ID: 14518116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Equivalence of litmus paper and intragastric pH probes for intragastric pH monitoring in the intensive care unit.
    Levine RL; Fromm RE; Mojtahedzadeh M; Baghaie AA; Opekun AR
    Crit Care Med; 1994 Jun; 22(6):945-8. PubMed ID: 7911416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Glass and antimony electrodes for long-term pH monitoring: a dynamic in vitro comparison.
    Geus WP; Smout AJ; Kooiman JC; Lamers CB; Gues JW
    Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 1995 Jan; 7(1):29-35. PubMed ID: 7866807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Accurate placement of the esophageal pH electrode for 24-hour pH monitoring using a combined pH/manometry probe.
    Klingler PJ; Hinder RA; Wetscher GJ; Davis DM; Achem SR; Seelig MH; O'Brien P; DeVault KR
    Am J Gastroenterol; 2000 Apr; 95(4):906-9. PubMed ID: 10763935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Simultaneous comparison of 24-hour intragastric pH recording using glass and antimony electrodes in man.
    Angerer M; Koelzow H; Londong W
    Dig Dis; 1990; 8 Suppl 1():38-45. PubMed ID: 2225518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effectiveness of pH measurements in predicting feeding tube placement.
    Metheny N; Williams P; Wiersema L; Wehrle MA; Eisenberg P; McSweeney M
    Nurs Res; 1989; 38(5):280-5. PubMed ID: 2508068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Regional differences in gastric acidity and antacid distribution: is a single pH electrode sufficient?
    Fisher RS; Sher DJ; Donahue D; Knight LC; Maurer A; Urbain JL; Krevsky B
    Am J Gastroenterol; 1997 Feb; 92(2):263-70. PubMed ID: 9040203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Assessment of gastric acidity in intensive care patients: intermittent pH registration cannot replace continuous pH monitoring.
    Bonten MJ; Gaillard CA; Stockbrügger RW; van Tiel FH; van der Geest S; Stobberingh EE
    Intensive Care Med; 1996 Mar; 22(3):220-5. PubMed ID: 8727435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of continuous pH-meter and intermittent pH paper monitoring of gastric pH in critically ill children.
    Solana MJ; López-Herce J; Sánchez C; Cordero M; Urbano J; Botrán M; Del Castillo J; Bellón JM; Carrillo A
    Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2012 Jan; 24(1):33-6. PubMed ID: 22016103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Prolonged pH monitoring: Bravo capsule.
    Pandolfino JE; Kahrilas PJ
    Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am; 2005 Apr; 15(2):307-18. PubMed ID: 15722243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.