These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1307882)

  • 41. Prospective trial comparing a combination pH probe-nasogastric tube with aspirated gastric pH in intensive care unit patients.
    Eisenberg PG; Cort D; Zuckerman GR
    Crit Care Med; 1990 Oct; 18(10):1092-5. PubMed ID: 2136344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. [The placement of nasogastric tubes].
    Laquintana D
    Assist Inferm Ric; 2001; 20(3):136-9. PubMed ID: 11769197
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. 24-h recording of intragastric pH: technical aspects and clinical relevance.
    van Herwaarden MA; Samsom M; Smout AJ
    Scand J Gastroenterol Suppl; 1999; 230():9-16. PubMed ID: 10499456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Comparison of tolerance and change of intragastric pH between early nasogastric and nasojejunal feeding following resection of colorectal cancer.
    Hsu TC; Su CF; Huang PC; Lu SC; Tsai SL
    Clin Nutr; 2006 Aug; 25(4):681-6. PubMed ID: 16698136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Effectiveness of pH measurements in predicting feeding tube placement: an update.
    Metheny N; Reed L; Wiersema L; McSweeney M; Wehrle MA; Clark J
    Nurs Res; 1993; 42(6):324-31. PubMed ID: 8247814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Changes in overnight fasting intragastric pH show poor correlation with duodenogastric bile reflux in normal subjects.
    Just RJ; Leite LP; Castell DO
    Am J Gastroenterol; 1996 Aug; 91(8):1567-70. PubMed ID: 8759663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Continuous intragastric pH monitoring: a real progress in the assessment of antisecretory drugs.
    Savarino V
    Ital J Gastroenterol; 1990; 22 Suppl 2():20-3. PubMed ID: 1983412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. [Continuous intragastric pH measurement in intensive care patients treated with ranitidine and tube feeding].
    Krier C; Böhrer H; Jürs G; Warth S; Just OH
    Anasth Intensivther Notfallmed; 1990 Jan; 25 Suppl 1():10-3. PubMed ID: 2106804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Comparison of pH probe-nasogastric tube with aspirated gastric pH.
    Sjöberg F; Tibbling L; Sandstedt S
    Crit Care Med; 1992 Apr; 20(4):552-4. PubMed ID: 1559375
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Effect of nasogastric suction and ranitidine on the calculated gastric intramucosal pH.
    Parviainen I; Vaisänen O; Ruokonen E; Takala J
    Intensive Care Med; 1996 Apr; 22(4):319-23. PubMed ID: 8708169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Antimony electrodes. Mucosal potential differences and buffer composition adversely affect pH measurements in the stomach.
    Opekun AR; Smith JL; Graham DY
    Dig Dis Sci; 1990 Aug; 35(8):950-5. PubMed ID: 2384040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. [Continuous intragastric pH monitoring].
    Asaki S; Kimpara T; Iijima K; Ohara S
    Nihon Rinsho; 1997 Apr; 55 Suppl 2():95-8. PubMed ID: 9172477
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. pH testing paper for measurement of intragastric acidity: an assessment.
    More DG; Boutagy J; Shenfield GM
    Anaesth Intensive Care; 1983 May; 11(2):147-50. PubMed ID: 6869778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. 24-H comparison between pH values of continuous intraluminal recording and simultaneous gastric aspiration.
    Savarino V; Mela GS; Scalabrini P; Magnolia MR; Percario G; Di Timoteo E; Celle G
    Scand J Gastroenterol; 1987 Mar; 22(2):135-40. PubMed ID: 3576125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Simultaneous measurement and recording of gastric potential difference and intragastric pH in man.
    Scarpignato C; Galmiche JP
    Dig Dis; 1990; 8 Suppl 1():60-70. PubMed ID: 2225521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Is a fluoroscopic verification of the electrode position necessary in ambulatory intragastric pH monitoring?
    Wilder-Smith CH; Gennoni MA; Triller J; Scheurer U; Merki HS
    Digestion; 1992; 52(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 1426691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Choosing the correct dual-channel pH catheter for the pediatric patient.
    Drews B; Galyen L; Perry L; Schluterman S; Stone J
    Gastroenterol Nurs; 1998; 21(6):252-3. PubMed ID: 10095508
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. [Aspiration pH-metry of the stomach by the Linar technic--an optimal method of studying gastric secretion].
    Geller LI; Geller AL
    Klin Med (Mosk); 1989 May; 67(5):140-1. PubMed ID: 2770203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Testing nasogastric tube positioning in the critically ill: exploring the evidence.
    May S
    Br J Nurs; 2007 Apr 12-25; 16(7):414-8. PubMed ID: 17505365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. The ion sensitive field effect transistor (ISFET) pH electrode: a new sensor for long term ambulatory pH monitoring.
    Duroux P; Emde C; Bauerfeind P; Francis C; Grisel A; Thybaud L; Arstrong D; Depeursinge C; Blum AL
    Gut; 1991 Mar; 32(3):240-5. PubMed ID: 2013417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.